Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 February 2008 09:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK Hi, As this is not my usual field I was hoping some of you might have links or hints as to where I can find soime literature or figures advising employers on how to reduce absences due to cold and flu viruses being spread. Obviously I have some common sense knoweldge I can refer to, but if any one has any links to relevant articles it would be appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 February 2008 10:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By H Klinkenberg If you want to view the debates on this subject I suggest you take a look at the PersonnalToday web site. My opinion: Many employers implement 'presenteeism' policies to meet HR attendance targets and ignore the significant problems associated with encouraging genuinely 'sick' employees to come to work. This 'presenteeism' policy can: 1. cause infections to be spread to other workers, 2. create an increased risk of accidents, mistakes and errors because sick employees are unable to concentrate on their work, 3. result in more overtime and reworking due to accidents, errors and mistakes, 4. reduce productivity, 5. cause tension, stress and resentment in the workforce, 6. result in a far greater financial loss than would have been experienced if the employer had encouraged the sick employee to 'get better' at home. The difficulty is separating the genuinely sick from those who are not! Humphrey Klinkenberg
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 February 2008 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephan Totally agree, infections can spread like wildfire within a working environment, especially if the person infected deals with food. The answer is indeed to stop at home until the symptonshave been gone for 24 - 48 hours
Admin  
#4 Posted : 28 February 2008 10:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell There's quite a bit of useful information on the UK resilience website at http://www.ukresilience.info/ It's mainly focussed on pandemic flu, but the advice they give is pretty universal. Unfortunately it isn't the easiest website in the world to read, and the useful stuff is a bit buried, but the good stuff is worth digging for! HTH, Paul
Admin  
#5 Posted : 28 February 2008 10:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK thanks guys.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 28 February 2008 11:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi It may help if there was a multi-pronged effort on lines similar to NHS to prevent spread of the "infection"(i.e. virus)--essentially, the importance of having clean hands, hand washing and cleaning door handles surfaces etc. But is this parcticable in a non health care setting?? This is a complex issue. Whether one should come to work or not --erhaps there is a need for some co-ordination between the professional bodies that represent HR(CIPD), Health professionals (various) and IOSH. Is this not a case of individual occupational health assessment?? (i.e. in some cases, home working should be encouraged) Another factor that coumpounds the situation is air conditioning/ventilation systems that recirculates the "air".
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 February 2008 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Jay, not sure I have seen any evidence that air conditioning spreads viruses. Are there any studies showing that? It is rare for Occ health to know that people are attending with colds etc., so difficult for them to intervene beyond policy level. Often individuals assume that they have to attend (certainly the case here). Often bosses have little true influence in the matter. I however, have just returned from three days rest due to a cold. I practice what I preach ;-)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.