Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 29 February 2008 19:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH No doubt this matter might have been discussed before, if not here is the situation. You are the PC and as such, am using labour only staff, which is provided by an employment agency. 1. Under current CDM regs, contractors self governing, site safety tours, reporting their findings back to the PC, should this include employment agencies, as they are the employer, (a person who pays his staff the wage)? 2. Should then; the employment agency, have their own competent H&S person? 3. Should the employment agency provide full PPE, i.e. boots, hi-vis, etc... to its employees?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 29 February 2008 19:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Jonathan Once you place an order for specific requirements and actually say yes; you are responsible not the agency 'per se;' there are some duties the agency has, but for an accurate response to your specific question: 1. No because you assume quasi and other legality / DOC of said personage once they are under your jurisdiction. 2. Probably, at least that's what the regulations suggest for the agency, as is for industry, and as far as BP goes they ought to, it won't however be a concern for you as the relationship between both parties is highly unlikely to overlap unless you state it under 'conditions'; again, remote and unusual. 3.Again very unlikely, but hey what, your the client; do you want them to? personally, I would prefer to have control over this one, not the agency. JS: When enjoying (if that is the case, as I have yet to find anyone that does) the pseudo employment of agency workers you can stipulate whatever you like; at a cost of course, as far as duties go in terms of your questions they are extremely limited. Call if you want to discuss further. Charley
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 February 2008 19:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH Charlie Employment Agency Regs, DOC, HASAWA, CDM2007,MHASAWR. Agency have supplied some PPE, but now as a CAB do not wish to provide. H&S Competent person however, they have to by law, we still carryout our own safety inspections but want to get the contractors to work with us, united front brothers, ever onwards....... Should the employment agency wash their hands as they take the money or should they carry out site inspections? DOC. Any case law, guidance appreciated. Death of a temp employee on a dock site springs to mind, any others.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 March 2008 11:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James M Looking at it from another angle, the agency will be required to risk assess the activity. How will they know whether the risk assessment is still current without going and inspecting the place of work?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 March 2008 11:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Jonathan How has the arrangement been set up with the agency to supply suitable operatives, it is just so darned flexible!? Charley
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 March 2008 17:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH CFT Have to discuss these points with procurement and DTI under Employment Agency Regs. My gut feeling is that they need to demonstrate DOC, which they are failing to at present. Is this beyond what the contract requires? don't care. Time to shoot procurement. Regards as ever. How's France?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 03 March 2008 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Jonathan Not quite sure where you are heading on this or whether these are your, ie PC agency staff, or subcontractors agency staff. The latter is easy in a way because you treat the employees as though they are the subcontractors'. When the PC employs agency people therefore the logic says they are PC employees to all intents and purposes. If you accept this point then the rest of your question becomes merely hypothetical. The PC is responsible for the H&S of his employees whether temporary or permanent and thus has the section 2 duties towards them. You have also vetted the agency to ensure they are competent to supply the right persons to meet your needs and with adequate training and competencies. They are unable to manage the details of your site and are not competent to check construction works but you are. If the agency was supplying trainees specifically then their requirements are somewhat different - these type of agencies are however rare, I know only one or two currently active. They still would not however do more than an assessment of the competence of the employing contractor - again not routine site inspections, but rather occassional inspections to verify their initial assessment of the contractor. Bob
Admin  
#8 Posted : 03 March 2008 09:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew M Jonathan IMO 1. Agency will have to ensure that the site their workers are going to is managed safely. Therefore they should inspect/audit. 2. Yes. will not be able to do step one without one. 3. Yes. In my mind they are the employer whilst both agency and the PC will have duties. I would expect the agency to supply PPE, but i guess that will be negotiated in the contract. Also have seen some adverts from agencies saying that workers must supply their own PPE. Most agencies I have dealt with are a complete liability. Not just for H&S but also employment law. Andrew
Admin  
#9 Posted : 03 March 2008 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH Just got this reply from, what used to be called the DTI after the question I asked: Please can you advise: Having reviewed the Employment Agency Act Section 13, does this refer to the agency providing the employee with protective footwear or the agency stating that employees must provide their own footwear? When referring to health and safety legislation PPE Regs 1992 Reg 4, Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. Reg 3.1 and in the HSE leaflet (http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg174.pdf )that states: Can I charge for providing PPE? An employer cannot ask for money from an employee for PPE, whether it is returnable or not. This includes agency workers if they are legally regarded as your employees. If employment has been terminated and the employee keeps the PPE without the employer’s permission, then, as long as it has been made clear in the contract of employment, the employer may be able to deduct the cost of the Their reply: Dear Mr Sandler EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES ACT 1973 Thank you for submitting details of your enquiry. I should explain that the Employment Agency Standards (EAS) Inspectorate is responsible for enforcing the provisions of the Employment Agencies Act 1973 and associated regulations. This legislation requires employment agencies and employment businesses to abide by specified minimum standards of conduct. Further details about the legislation can be obtained from our website, www.berr.gov.uk/employme...ment-agencies/index.html Regulation 13 of the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003, requires all agencies and employment agencies to set out in writing details of any fees that the agency or employment business might charge to a worker, which are not for finding or seeking to find them work. For example, CV preparation, finding accommodation, providing them with transport or uniforms. Any services provided and fees charge cannot be conditional upon the worker using and paying for these services in order to be found work. PPE is different in that according to the HSE an employer cannot ask a worker (employee) to pay for PPE. If the PPE is not returned when the workers stops working in that position HSE consider that the employer can deduct a fee from the workers wages provided that it is in their contract or terms and it complies with the unauthorised deductions provisions of the Employment Rights Act. I hope this is helpful. Yours sincerely Steve Keeler Investigations Manager Re the inspections, they must carry them out. Hope that helps? Regards
Admin  
#10 Posted : 03 March 2008 11:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Jonathan I am not convinced by the ps to the reply you have copied. I attach brief details below of a case that clearly suggests the employer taking on an agency worker is actually taking on an employee. The response is so brief and non-argued that I find it difficult to comprehend the line of logic for the answer. In the recent landmark decision of Brook Street Bureau(UK)Limited v Dacas [2004] EWCA Civ 217, the majority of the Court of Appeal found not only that an implied contract existed between a cleaner (who had contracted only with the employment agency) and the end-user but that she was an employee of the end-user. As a result, she was able to claim unfair dismissal against the end-user. I rather suspect that most agency contracts with employers are clear about the employing organisation's responsibilities for a safe workplace. They have duties to ensure people are placed in competent organisations and the competent organisation then manages the work of the agency worker. The above relates initially to unfair dismissal but one can make reasonable supposition that this would apply to H&S. If not there is a class of employee who is not protected by the employer in control of the day to day work. Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 03 March 2008 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe Fenoughty Joe Fenoughty NEBOSH H&S Officer Hi Jonathan I do not think it is the responsibility of the employment agency to provide any safety inspections, more for the employer on site to provide those controls.An outside agency specialising in inspections and safety tours could be used, they would then report to employing management. In my experience, contractors provide their risk assessments, method statements and PPE.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 04 March 2008 08:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren (Daz) Fraser Hi Johnathon I came across a very good guide regarding agency staff and contractors a few months ago on the business link website. Contractors page http://www.businesslink....7&r.l2=1079568262&r.s=tl Agency staff http://www.businesslink....opicId=1077243939&r.s=sl Hope the above links are useful. Sorry cannot be of more assistance. Daz
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.