Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 10 March 2008 08:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lyndon Sutcliffe From my point of view I see this is as 'comfort' as opposed to 'health and safety' but I am under increasing pressure to sanction the use of air purifiers in our main office. The reasons being given for this equipment are anti bacterial, anti static, deionising etc. Has anyone any opinions on the pitfalls/benefits of providing such equipment? There are obvious hazards in the type of equipment that has been suggested so far as it involves using a resevoir of water which allegedly catches airborne particles. The obvious hazards being water/electrical, slips, manual handling (when emptying) and waste issues, but are there any other, less obvious issues to consider before we go down this route? Don't shoot me, I just don't have the time to deal with this type of issue!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 10 March 2008 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter IMHO these things are a waste of money, space and energy. That water reservoir you mention is also a very effective breeding ground for bacteria, which the machine will then circulate.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 10 March 2008 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Baynes A number of years ago a member of our staff brought in a de-ioniser to purify the air in the vicinity of his desk which was in a corner. After a while it was noticed that the de-ioniser was attracting all the dust in the air towards it. We could tell because much of it stuck to the walls and files around his desk. The walls and plastic trunking became ingrained to the extent they could not be cleaned sufficiently to remove the dirt. As he had placed it at the back corner of his desk, this was all flowing past him, he must have been breathing it in. He gave up the use of it and ever since I have been sceptical of their use unless expertly sited as part of an air filtration system. Bob.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 10 March 2008 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Worth We recently installed humidifers after complaints. DON'T overlook the Legionella risk!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 10 March 2008 14:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day The other thing to consider is that many of these units just don't have the capacity to condition an office so at best only give a localised effect. If you want an office at the perfect temp, humidity, ionisation levels you need to be looking at the sort of close control air conditioning equipment that is common in computer rooms these will do all that is required and will also have high efficiency filters. HOWEVER, it all goes wrong when the units are not maintained, filters not replaced regularly and the most common aspect - the office staff themselves either opening windows or leaving doors open and everyone trying to 'play' with the thermostat.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.