Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 10 March 2008 09:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Hi All. I would appreciate your opinion on the following situation. Workplace car park has roughly 1000 places including 8 disabled bays (we have 4 disabled persons on site). It is recommended that there should be 1 bay for each disabled + 2%, which would be 28 disabled bays. I looked through the information for the couple of past years and we never had more than 2 more disabled persons in addition to those based on site, which means that 22 disabled bays are likely to be always vacant. What would be the best way to identify how many disabled bays we should have - go by the recommendations and provide all 28 or carry out provision risk assessment, any other alternatives? Many thanks for your assistance. Paul
Admin  
#2 Posted : 10 March 2008 09:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By willhiem its more a universal access issue paul so i'm not sure a risk assessment is necessary, its something you may find the answer for in part M of your building regs or part R in northern ireland, or BS 8300. i dont know if there is any definitive answer, but you do have to reasonably accommodate so. If you're already employing people wheelchair users etc maybe get their opinion, and if you see fit maybe a universal access audit, but the fact you are already employing people with disabilities means your workplace is probably fairly good in terms of acces, and most audits now adays are of checklist form on a handheld PC.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 10 March 2008 10:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Recommended by who? Common sense says look at the history, as you have and set a number to suit. If you made six such spaces and adjusted that in the future if you continuously had problems, you would be doing far more than most - and no-one would say that you were being unreasonable. In extreme cases, such as a pre-notified event involving more than six disabled drivers, you could always reserve spaces and provide temporary accommodation of the vehicles.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 10 March 2008 11:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Guys, thanks for your input. I think the recommendations mentioned in my original post were found in Designing for Accessibility good practice guide based on BS 8300:2001 in the context of DDA. There is also some reference in Building Reg Part M, but there it only requires one disabled bay if I am not mistaken. So, by the looks of it there are no solid figures and if we provide less parking spaces for disabled that in the BS 8300 it should not be a problem. Thanks again Paul.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 March 2008 07:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derekh Paul Obviously (in a workplace scenario)where parking spaces were at a premium having 28 accessible bays that are never likely to be used would not be considered reasonable. Therefore provide one accessible bay for each employee who requires one - and however many additional you feel you need for visitors who may need accessible parking. As long as you monitor the situation to make sure you have sufficient to meet your needs you will be ok. you don't say what kind of workplace it is, so if for example it is somewhere where there is likely to be additional needs at specific times (if you hold training courses or meetings where additional requirements may arise) then you can always make other bays available (reserve an area)for disabled motorists to use on a temporary basis. The DDA for service providers - and visitors, even business visitors, could be classed as 'sections of the public' - asks for only what is reasonable. Under the DDA only if a person with a disability is disadvantaged is there an issue -not the fact that you have not followed the BS. The fact that the premises does not follow AD M (to the building regs)I would suggest is not your issue for reasons that I won't go into (too long). Only employee issues (access requirements)relating to disabled access are covered (absolute) under H & S law (Reg 25A of the Workplace Regs)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.