Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 March 2008 14:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edel Breslin Hi all I have been asked look at the issue re: non compliance with smoking ban and proposals to deal with the issues I have to look to best practice else where etc etc... - the only way I can see is to put in detectors and fine and disciplinary if caught? Any takers on how you all deal with it - Also proposals sought for dealing with the problem of large no.s people smoking around entrances/reception areas thanks a mil
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 March 2008 14:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Edel, treat smoking on work premises the same as any other disciplinary issue - refer to your own (hopefully) published staff rules and apply the process. What would you do if an employee was continually bullying others or refusing to use provided safety equipment or driving their FLT at too high speed or pilfering or abusing customers or chose to consistently break the law of the land? Eventual dismissal may be a harsh option but may work "pour enourager les autres"
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 March 2008 21:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper Sack em!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 March 2008 07:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Is it your job to discipline etc or the managers of the people concerned Or is the usual in place e.g. 'its not me mate' says the manager 'its H&S causing trouble again' Pass this across to Personnel/HR
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 March 2008 08:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson No second chance - instant dismissal if caught ! Great deterrent ! Unfortunately you then have to adhere to your process and go through a dismissal process if needed to prove your intent !
Admin  
#6 Posted : 12 March 2008 08:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephan Re-issue your policy to all staff and emphasise the disciplinary actions involved. Get signatures to state all employees have seen the policy, then they have no excuse.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 12 March 2008 08:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Longworth I tell you what, you don't half get a lot of sack them all merchants on here. Easy to say when you aren't the one having to deal with it. My first thoughts are, why aren't the departmental managers managing the situation. What about HR, this is an HR issue after all. What sort of facilities do the company provide for smokers, if any? Do they comply to the requirements? Was there a consultation process before the Health Act became law? Have people that have been found smoking been given any counselling etc? Look at all these areas before you think about disciplinary action and by the way forget about any fines, they would be illegal deductions I suspect. Finally remember you are dealing with people here so ask yourself if jumping into the "fire them all" response is appropriate.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 12 March 2008 08:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch (Fully) Agree with Pete.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 12 March 2008 10:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67. Hi Whilst I am not a hang and flog them merchant the law is clear on no smoking in the workplace. Seems to me also that you should remember that the onus on the employer to prevent smoking in the building is much stronger than on the individual smoker hence a much higher fine for the employer/owner. This is clearly a breach of company policy, rules etc. and as such must be dealt with by managers. It is also not an H&S issue but an HR one. I would pass the buck right back to them. Re the smokers there is no requirement to provide a place/area for smokers, although there is nothing to stop you doing this if you feel it will help. With regard to smokers "hanging" about in and around the entrance. We ( a large office block with customer contact at the front reception), do not allow staff to smoke at the front door area. They use an area at the rear. With regard to where your staff smoke the guidance is not prescriptive but clearly indicates that it should not be in an area that allows second hand smoke back into the building - via doors or windows. Seems to me you should also be considering the non smoker as in essence the law is really about protecting non smokers. What will you do if one of them contacts the enforcing authority and blows the whistle on you? I would. Re issue your policy, let them know that breaches will lead to disciplinary action, that they individually can be fined by the enforcing authority as well as the company. Offer advice on were they can attend smoking cessation classes if possible bring someone in to do this on your premises, say over lunch time or directly after work. If you can afford to, offer time off to attend these. Seems too that you really need to improve the discipline in your workplace. Few companies would allow this level of disregard of company policy, we certainly wouldn't. cheers
Admin  
#10 Posted : 12 March 2008 10:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "Hi Whilst I am not a hang and flog them merchant the law is clear on no smoking in the workplace" - water67 Really? Looking at the poster's email address, they might not be where you are ... (it might be Eire, in which case of course you are right). Edel - where are you talking about? If it was in England, the company could be facing very large fines, and reputational issues .. so I would get hard, quickly.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 12 March 2008 10:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67. Hi Tabs, the posting clearly states non compliance with the smoking ban.. thus reasonable! to assume it is a country with no smoking laws!!!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 12 March 2008 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham May I suggest that there is a difference between an employee ignoring the smoking ban and ignoring company rules re driving FLT, using PPE, etc. In the latter case the employee is ignoring the company rules. In the former he is simply breaking the law. So perhaps there is a difference and a different approach is needed by the employer. For the employer not to respond firmly to a breach of the smoking ban could ultimately represent the employer condoning an illegal act. Chris
Admin  
#13 Posted : 12 March 2008 11:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Thanks water67, but we had smoking bans long before the law changed. The penalties were very different, as was the approach to enforcement. The laws are very clear, but the posting isn't. Reasonable? Yes indeed, very - but not accurate. I was seeking clarification because of the differences :-)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 12 March 2008 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Reeves water67 - my understanding is that it is not illegal to smoke in a workplace - only in enclosed buildings. Smoking is not against the law in, for example, an open bullders yard (but there may be safety issues with regard to flammables). Colin
Admin  
#15 Posted : 12 March 2008 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim If smoking in the workplace is breaking the law why not call the police and let them deal with the guilty culprit? (Not quite as simple as that I know) I recently had a sub contractor smoking in his company vehicle during the lunch break, he was parked outside the site and inside his firm's van. Whose problem is this?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 12 March 2008 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Himself and His employer see earlier posts up there
Admin  
#17 Posted : 12 March 2008 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Chris, the breaking of a company safety rule by an employee may well be a criminal breach of primary legislation (eg refusal to use PPE), just as smoking in a workplace is a criminal breach of the relevant Act. Clearly, not all countries have the same laws but for Ireland and UK I understand they are very similar. Both can be prosecuted by the relevant Authority and both are likely to be breaches of company rules, subject to disciplinary measures. Whatever our views on the rights and wrongs of smoking legislation it was passed in UK as a health measure - same as COSHH.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 12 March 2008 12:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham David I agree with you. However, whether PPE is required or not is down to the employer's assessment of what is needed. There is an option on the part of the employer to change or waive a particular requirement he has established. With smoking there is no flexibility for the employer or employee. In an enclosed workplace smoking is illegal. That is where I see the difference. Chris
Admin  
#19 Posted : 12 March 2008 14:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Chris, I understand and agree.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 12 March 2008 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T Hey Crim, the police do not enforce the smoking legislation (similar to HSE legislation) therefore anyone would be quite at liberty to tell them to "go forth and multiply" if they so wished.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.