Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 March 2008 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JWG Dear all, One of the recently inspected swing arm cranes that was given an SWL of 1.5 tonnes, has been re-inspected by a different lifting engineer and he has given it a SWL of 1 tonne. Both companies have declared that their results are correct and the original company has backed that up in writing. Before I go down various complaint routes, I'm just wondering if this is common, or has someone grossly made an error? There are an other 20 cranes that may need re-testing as a result. Many thanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 March 2008 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis I think strictly you have to accept the latest inspection. The original company will simply insist they were right at the time of test. It is a bit like the MOT - you cannot win the argument Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 March 2008 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Agree with Bob on the aspect of 2 companies 2 results however, you start off by saying 1 crane "inspected" leading to 20 being "re-tested" if 1 inspection is going to lead to 20 tests have the original crane tested to determine the SWL and potentially save the cost of a further 19 tests. Mitch
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 March 2008 22:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By William Lloyds supply my workplace with insurance for the cranes and from what i know they also say how much it can lift. I would contact whoever supplies your liability insurance to find out more. The reason why you may have had different swl by different engineers could be that one noticed a defect that the other did not and decided to derate the swl to take this into account.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 March 2008 22:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper William If the engineer had detected a defect that warranted a reduction in the SWL then it should be highlighted in his report Barry
Admin  
#6 Posted : 24 March 2008 06:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David A Cooper As an engineer surveyor I have to take the crane manufacturers SWL as the actual one. I wouldnt derate the crane unless I could apply some quantum that made the new SWL a guaranteed safe load. Most detected defects would render the crane out of service rather than derating. I suspect that you may have a situation where the crane is affected by something else for example if it is an overhead crane and the track has a swl then the crane swl is the track swl MINUS the crane weight etc etc...Dave
Admin  
#7 Posted : 24 March 2008 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 Just learnt something. Thanks Dave for the insight.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.