Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 09 April 2008 22:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Brede Did any of you watch the news tonight showing a council worker in Dewsbury, Yorkshire carrying a steel plate up a ladder single handed to board up the poor child's home. You would have thought that in view of the guaranteed coverage of the story a text book effort to board up the home would have been made, or perhaps this was it!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 10 April 2008 06:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Taff2 Saw it - wondered what other system could have been adopted: Scaffolding - no (higher risk - longer period + more people at risk) Cherry picker - possibly, but was there access from the road When I pointed this out to a friend in the pub - he came back with the old chestnut - "the guy did the job, he did not have an accident, he did not have an injury - all this in front of the BBC cameras (extra pressure) - therefore it was a safe act. By definition no injury = safe....."
Admin  
#3 Posted : 10 April 2008 08:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Brede Smaller pieces of hoarding and an access scaffold would seem to be the right answer?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 10 April 2008 08:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis This is the way the LA has been doing this for the last umpteen years - probably has had a few accidents, as have all other local authorities and housing associations who have been doing this, but they only allow a tenner in the schedule of rates for it to be done. Question is who is liable and if the person doing the job falls and is killed, by chance, is the Client on the sharp end as well as the contractor, presuming this was not a DLO operative? Would both employers end up on a CM charge? Bob
Admin  
#5 Posted : 10 April 2008 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "By definition no injury = safe....."" Or lucky so far. Is this the fifth person on the contract because the first four are now injured / dead? Is a gun discharged in a busy marketplace safe if the bullet misses everyone? Not my definition of safe :-)
Admin  
#6 Posted : 10 April 2008 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anthony Edwards Hi there, I saw something similar on Grand Designs last night when they were working on a log cabin roof no edge protection/scaffolding etc, fine until it goes Pete Tong!! Nutty
Admin  
#7 Posted : 10 April 2008 21:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper It amazes me on Grand Designs how many times I have seen no scaffolding, no fall protection, no hard hat, no safety specs, you name it, and they have have done it. Wonder how many accidents have occurred. On one of the shows, the guy fell off planks used as a floor on the first storey. Great advertising for H&S Barry
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.