Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andrew bryan Dear fellow IOSH members, We have received a complaint from an employee, regarding that they alledge some workers are smoking drugs in the smoking hut & other employees are going to the local pub and lunch time and returning back to after consuming alcohol (I have to state that these are just allegations at this stage and they come from an employee who complains and alledges a lot, And so far none off the previous complaints have been true)But never the less, We have to take the claim seriously, We have re-issued out to all employees the D&A policy (which contains D&A rules, Information that random testing will be introduced, disciplinary action and advice on D&A taking, AA etc..) We would also like to introduce random testing for D&A, Alcohol seems to be easy enough to undertake, We are stuck on drugs. A couple of issues we have are, 1) What is the best method. 2) Where do we stand on introducing and informing staff that D&A testing will commence 3) If for example we have an occasional smoker of drugs, who partook in a smoke on Friday PM and we then tested them on Monday, would it still impair their activities for work that day? Apologies for long question,. Any advice would be gratefully appreciated. Many Thanks Andrew
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer There a a few very good professional bodies who will undertake such testing on random basis basis for you. They are quite cost effective and thier history has enabled various companies to take very severe action against those who were found in breach of the policy. It is very important you specify within your policy exactly what could result of a positive test. There are several very good policies available for reference, try and get one and look to implement a sound policy and apply it.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 April 2008 16:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert. While I agree with Bob,you may end up with an HR concern here and hitting alot of raw nerves. What if a (large) number of employees refuse to be tested? Do you suspend them and risk a low production out-put? Is a contract of employment written with D&A in mind? The person making the allegations could be asked to provide some reasonable evidence. Possibly naming the individuals who are smoking dope at work. Maybe they are just jealous!! As far as going to the pub at lunchtime, there is a massive difference between someone having a quick half (is that acceptable?)and one who returns to work visibly intoxicated. Personally I think the consumption of alcohol at works lunchbreaks, should be a no-no anyway. Why would A.A be involved if you happened to prove that someone had a lunchtime drink. Likewise would you send an individual to drugs re-hab on a Monday after a smoke at the weekend. Alcoholism and drug addiction are conditions and should not be confused with abuse. If there are problems either way then the company should also provide a policy of assisting / counciling any individuals if it suspects any drug or alcohol related illnesses. Wasn't there a thread relating to the over indulgence of coffee last week? regards
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 April 2008 12:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Have known a quite large number of staff getting caught in the pub (not had the experience of drugs) and they were all suspended from duty. The test proved positive and they were all sacked, don't know what happened on appeal though. The basic fact is that when you adopt a policy of zero tolerence you must follow it up or your policy will quickly fall into disrepute. Yes it maycause some production problems, but that is better than facing large compensation bills from anyone injured or even corporate manslaugher charges because you knew driniking was a part of the culture and did nothing to stop it.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 April 2008 12:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Andrew, Depending upon your terms and conditions of employment more than likely a HR problem but could (very)soon become a H&S problem. Get the employee to put the complaint in writing and let them (HR) deal with it.D&D + work not good I'm with the earlier post, no tolerance.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 15 April 2008 15:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Haynes Just make sure that any policy you implement applies to everyone [inc the MD and his glass of wine with his lunch] Also - if you institute 'random testing' - make sure you do all the 'top team' first.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.