Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 April 2008 23:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John A Wright One of my small customers employed me as their safety consultant last year, a one-day-a-month visit arrangement. They are just a small modern unit building, front entrance, twenty electrical machines, 12 staff, one rear fire exit. On the first couple of visits we sorted some paperwork out, particularly his insurance documents where he had to state he had a safety officer or give the name/address of a safety consultant. I also conducted a fire risk assessment for the site. There's twenty machines, very small amounts of flammable liquids in aerosols, some foam and plastic in the building, shutter-door at front, one rear fire exit. I gave him my assessment but would not print a inspection 'certificate' because on both days the escape route to the front exit was partly obstructed, and the escape route to the rear fire exit was obstructed, the fire exit door was LOCKED and outside of that there was a gate which had a padlock on the OUTSIDE. Several months later the fire exit is still locked, the padlock is still there and I have told him three times I refuse to enter the site till that is sorted (I had planned to train fire marshalls and conduct PUWER assessments on all the machines etc.). He doesn't seem bothered, he keeps things locked for security, and I suspect he's just happy to have my name/address on his insurance documents. But where do I stand? Looking at my copy of the Fire Risk Assessment document (it's a 4 page document) the relevant points I've made are: C3. rear exit escape route - keep clear at all times; unlock padlock during work time D3. Significant Findings - Rear fire exit is locked. Find key or new lock for the door - Rear gate is padlocked. Fit new padlock/chain that can be unlocked from inside. I've also noted that fire marshall(s) should be instructed/trained to unlock the fire exit door/gate during work hours. So where do I stand, if they have a fire at that site have I written enough that I am not liable? Should I contact the insurance company and tell them I am no longer his safety consultant? John W, TechIOSH
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 April 2008 07:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel tell your customer that you are moving on and tell his insurance company and the local fire service that you have done so The longer you leave it the more it could look like connivance
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 April 2008 07:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie John, I was in a not dissimilar position a few years ago. A new client who called me in because the HSE were investigating them refused to act on my advice (even on the most basic matters) In the end I sent him a letter BY RECORDED DELIVERY telling him that I was no longer willing to be his H&S consultant. I also advised him of the IOSH register of consultants to help him find someone else. If you decide to walk away make sure that you have proof that you have terminated the contract and when it took place.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 April 2008 08:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT John You probably hoped for more, but I find Bob's response accurately sums up my own thoughts on this one. All the best CFT
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 April 2008 08:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Halesowen Baggie I wouldnt worry about it John, You have carried out your part of the deal with a suitable and sufficient risk assessment. It is up to the client if he does not carry out your recommendations. Your RA would hang the client, not you!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 15 April 2008 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 The WBA supporter has got it right (4 -3, you were lucky!). It is not your problem, you've given your best advice and hopefully you have been paid. But if you are not happy working with the company then tell them and move on. I'm not at all sure why you would want to report them to their insurance company or why you have been advised to report them to the HSE? I just can't see why that would be considered an acceptable course of action?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 15 April 2008 09:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs John, Take a read of the IOSH Code of Conduct too - it has guidance as to what is expected of members. At point 7 it says that you can ask IOSH for advice, I would take that opportunity. Personally, I think this is a case of imminent danger and I would be inclined to report it. Regardless of the management, the people working there deserve protection and you know what that should be. It may be uncomfortable for you, but a locked escape route could mean deaths and that would be on your conscience, regardless of fault. See http://www.hse.gov.uk/workers/whistleblowing.htm
Admin  
#8 Posted : 15 April 2008 09:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John A Wright Thanks you for the responses, as I expected mixed responses. I think I do go along with informing the insurance company - the way I look at it is it's my job to reduce risks at customers. Clearly if I walk away I will not reduce the risks at this customer, but if I inform the insurance company and they tell the customer that, to continue being insured, they must get another safety consultant then maybe some action will be taken and risks will be reduced. So I think I'll spell this out to the customer first. John W
Admin  
#9 Posted : 15 April 2008 10:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew M COuld you not just take a pair of bolt cutters with you next time and charge them for an additional service?! I doubt he'd want to take action against you and you would be being proactive. ANdrew
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 April 2008 10:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister John, you are engaged to give advice, not to enforce and your thread title gives the clue to the answer - recommendations are just that. Requirements may be imposed by EHO/HSE/ Fire Officer and also insurers as a condition of cover but as consultants we can only advise and recommend (although very strongly recommend). I have also been in a similar position to that you describe and my chosen action was to eventually terminate my contract, but only after a significant period of time during which I attempted to use my powers of persuasion. When I finally realised that it was all a game to my client and my name as his "competent advisor" was all he was really wanting, I gave up and withdrew. The decision on whether you inform other bodies is a moral decision and depends on your own set of values. I will not offer advice on that. So far as locked fire exits are concerned, there have been deaths, but of course only when a fire has occurred. Is this serious & imminent danger? I have no doubt that a fire officer would take enforcement action if it was discovered by them but my interpretation of "serious... etc" is a direct and current threat to life safety or very major health threat e.g. unprotected roof work, asbestos exposure, danger of asphyxiation, using an unguarded power press, unprotected live electrical work. Interesting thread that I will keep my eyes on.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 15 April 2008 10:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Halesowen Baggie Being a consultant myself, I would not get much sleep or piece of mind if I worried about whether all my clients had carried out my recommendations!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 15 April 2008 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Of all the parties noted herein the only one that can and will hit the pocket/client etc quickly is the the insurance company as its in their direct interest to do so The HSE etc would probably take no action because of their work load etc
Admin  
#13 Posted : 15 April 2008 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "The HSE etc would probably take no action because of their work load etc" Sadly, there are cases that HSE are delayed in - but then this would best be mentioned to the enforcing fire officer, who in my experience will not be delayed. It is a moral decision, and I am chilled by some responses here ... but I realise it is a personal issue.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 15 April 2008 11:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John A Wright Baggie, Indeed, there are alot worse instances of customer being slow to take any action following my recommendation - the worst problem at my main customer is the lack of segregation of FLTs and shopfloor staff, changes are taking place but at a dreadfully slow rate, I'm not losing sleep but I'm constantly concerned that there will be an accident and I'll worry if I've done enough. David B, You ask if this fire exit issue poses imminent danger and the answer is no. Ignition sources are very small/slight, though, because of the situation I have not yet examined the machines which might have electrical faults (though my PUWER assessments won't necessarily find electrical faults). I didn't mention earlier that the fire risk assessment does mention another ignition source - smoking. The employees of course don't smoke in the building - as far as I know.... I recall that their smoking area was a couple of stools set out on the front drive. Usually there's a van and a skip sitting there too, and I suspect with recent weather that the smokers have been congregating rather close to the shutter door, near where there is plastic and polythene stored inside, and (apart from the locked fire exit) that is the only other main exit, apart from the door that goes through their office which exits near the shutter door where the smokers could start a fire..... Not imminent danger but there are risks. I'm not comfortable with my name on the insurance documents when I am no longer actively acting as the consultant on that site. John W
Admin  
#15 Posted : 15 April 2008 12:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67. Hi, I agree with most of the responses, get out and let the relevant people know. I note you assert you hoped to reduce risk for this company and of course we all feel the same and do our best. But we all need to realise that any client, manager etc can carry the risk, we need to make sure they realise they also carry the burden of consequences should it go belly up. We do our best within our knowledge abilities etc. That's all we can do. Unfortunately in some cases we then just have to walk away. Cheers.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 15 April 2008 12:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ITK You should make a quick call to the enforcing agency outlining your concerns.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.