Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 09 May 2008 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
How many members of this forum have seen the latest report on the work of the HSE by the Select Committee on Work and Pensions?

There are two items that I particularly noted, those referring to "reasonably practicable" and to qualification for those engaged in health and safety advice/consultancy.

Chris
Admin  
#2 Posted : 09 May 2008 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MP
Chris

Do you have a handy link please?

Thanks
Admin  
#3 Posted : 09 May 2008 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
I just Googled "Select Committee on Work and Pensions" and took it from there.

Chris
Admin  
#4 Posted : 09 May 2008 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Chris, I think there was a previous thread discussing regulation of the profession arising from that Report.
I also noted the HSE Chair stressing the need for "easily digestible" risk assessment.
Having looked at some of the HSE website examples, I have to conclude that "easily digestible" does not always equate to "suitable and sufficient".
It is slightly worrying to see "general" and "hygiene and welfare" identified under a R/A hazard column (e.g. MVR.
That said, given that 50% or so of SME have NO Risk Assessments at all, this information and guidance (on balance) can't be a bad thing.Call me a cynic, but I do think that the Enforcers will be seeing a lot of their own work copied verbatim as SME Risk Assessments, despite the caveats on the website!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.