Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 May 2008 12:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Foulds
I have just had a group of 1st aiders return from a refresher course and are all very entusiastic about having work place defifrillators.

The cost is not an issue but the safe operation and control of the machines does give me cause for concern.

Has anyone got experience of have this sort of equipment or pros vs cons?

Thanks for your thoughts

Mike
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 May 2008 13:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zyggy Turek
Mike,

There is no doubt that they can save lives in the hands of capable & trained persons.

However, this must be put into context of how many people you employ & the likelihood of it ever being used.

We purchased one some 7 years ago following "political" pressure & decided to place it in a location which attracts over 100k people per year.

Following advice from the manufacturers; ambulance service and our insurers, the AED could only be used by registered First Aiders who had additional training, which then had to be refreshed after 9 months (the advice on this period varies with different organisations).

We then had to ensure that the AED could not be used by an "unauthorised" person.

In that time it has been used twice & unfortunately could not prevent a loss of life.

We tried to get funding from the BHF, but were advised that they would only support organisations that had large volumes of people passing through, e.g. airports, etc.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 May 2008 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Foulds
Thanks for that, anyone else got any feelings on the subject?

Mike
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 May 2008 12:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
Hi Mike, there have been some very interesting threads on the subject in the past with a range of opinions being expressed. If you search using the "search forums" link to the right you should be able to find several that may go some way to answering your question.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.