Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 May 2008 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bruce Sutherland
Hi

I have something at the back of my mind that in the last two years or so there has been a change in either the "rules" or interpretation so that the loser in an IT may end up paying all the costs - I am aware about orders etc but would appreciate if anyone has any details, as I am drawing a complete blank in my web searches

Many thanks

Bruce
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 May 2008 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By mark gough2
An hearing is pretty much on the lines of the small claims court.

They can up hold the decision and award all costs/ partial costs or no costs

Likewise they can dismiss and award all costs/ partial costs or no costs

In short it can cost several thousand to appeal.

In a recent case i was involved in the HSE asked for £12000 costs and were awarded £8000
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.