Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brando All
Not being a union member or expert....
How many safety reps should a site have?
If the reps are voted in by the members are they automatically given rights to sit in on all health and safety committee meetings?
Can Management refuse entry to any meeting to an elected rep?
Has anyone had to deal with reps who turn up to meetings and are simply negative and disruptive?
And no - I'm not having a go at unions!
Brando
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Thos G Hello Brando, get your self a copy of the 'brown book' the SRSC regs. In relation to disruptive/negativity the best way to counteract this is through education. Encourage them to partake in the TU education programme for safety reps. Safety reps are entitled to attend bonafide safety committees. Generally the amount of safety reps can be decided by the size of the workforce and the diversity of jobs within the workplace. I worked in a construction repairs business that employed 700 people. We had a safety rep from each of the TUs represented at work i.e. 5. Its no good talking M&E stuff to a scaffolder and vice versa. Bear in mind that oversized committees dont work well.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lilian McCartney Hi Brando,
we have more safety reps than who comes to the H&S Committee. A constitution was agreed with members nos (including mgt side, advisers, guests (which may include a safety rep with a particular interest in an agenda item), remit etc.
A code of conduct could be written for members but I expect that employees would have this anyway when on work business.
Our Working groups on reviewing procedures/policies are not necessarily made up of H&S Comm members either but interested parties from whole organisation - whether TU safety reps/members or not.
Lilian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 And for the sake of clarity, the 1977 regs only apply to the arrangements for consulting with union appointed safety reps. That is, those appointed by the union to represent their members. they may also represent other groups, of course, but only with management approval to those arrangements. You may therefore, have other areas of the undertaking that are not union members and would not wish to be associated with that process and, therefore, their interests are best served by other means of consultation under the 1996 Regs. These two sets of regs are often confused or combined by users; probably arising from the fact that in most workplaces there is only one "safety committee" because that is the obvious common sene way to do things.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter Farrell I come from a union background but now work for a different company as an advisor, set the committee members and stick to it, support the unions in training etc and know the 'brown book' once you atart working together and they see that health and safety is transparent quite often they settle and work with you rather than against. When I started this role the unions although elected didn't get involved, I encouraged them to train, carryout inspections and attend the meetings they no longer fight against me but will often seek my advise how we can work together for the safety of all. I am not saying it's easy or without confrontation at times but stick at it and you may find they become an asset
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By willhiem we have reps but we dont tell them anything, they only get in the way and cause trouble, Unions, who needs them, they do nothing!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brando Thanks all for your comments.
One of the problems I have is two individuals who are basically disruptive and negative, agressive and rude.
Frankly, I don't think educating them is worth the effort even if it were possible. They are just simply anti-management and fit my mental picture of a typical union rep ( my mental picture is probably unfair but, well there you go ).
I'll download the black book and give it a look. thanks Brando
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By willhiem ah they all think they're jimmy hoffa!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter Brando, you state reps "voted in by the members". Safety Reps have to be appointed. They should have a letter of appointment from their TU. I'm not Union bashing either, but surely it would be reasonable to take the matter up with the TU itself. All TUs have the same ethos of improving H&S through consultation NOT confrontation. Maybe they can help?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter And anyone attending ANY meeting who is disruptive, aggressive and rude is asked to leave - end of story. The "Committee" is the Employer's Forum for consultation - a strong Chair is a must.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jeffrey Watt I would echo Ron's sentiment re a strong chair, I'm 19 stone and need a strong chair all the time.
In my twenties (years, not stones this time) I was a full time seconded officer for a public sector union. That experience tells me some reps are sensible, some are not. Some managers are sensible, some are not. Some safety bods are sensible and some are not.
Good advice above re tight constitution for your committee, and having the TU communicate who is appointed.
Kind regards
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By willhiem my comments above were only looking for a bit of thursday evening banter, apologies, no offence intended. A company i used to work for had a rep for ever 20 people, on site, a few of these reps were sent on training course, very simple but explained the issues and role of the rep, it seemed to have a positive effect with one or two of the reps completing other courses - scaffold inspection etc etc they really took it on board and once they were better informed they really helped make a difference both around the site and in overall running of safety on the project, it was noticeable better than sites which didnt have the same training. I do recognise that sometime somepeople can use such training to advance themselves and simply cause hassle but i think most folk would appreciate it and see it as a two sided coin, trying to help themselves on site and also help the management in the way its run. maybe a seperation of roles may help, your traditional union rep and then another who is not already a rep as a safety rep?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis Hello Brandon ref your question on union safety reps . First of all can i say i am a union health and safety rep just recently qualified as an IOSH TEC this gained by completing Union safety courses and TUC ones. Safety reps are there for there members as there are a lot of dodgy companies out there you dont take health and safety serious enough. I my self work for the NHS as a senior support worker and also a Union health and safety officer. I take my role very seriously and sit on all levels of management meetings and have 4 safety reps who also work with me. Decent Union safety reps save company's money and promote a safer workplace where safety reps are based. If you have a couple of bad ones in your company i would suggest you speak to there Union branch . I can assure there are just as many bad managers out there who do nothing for health and safety issue. With Regards Joe Collinson Unite Health and Safety Officer joecollinson40@yahoo.co.uk
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brando The people I am talking about are not there for their members - they are there for themselves.
Very few people who are elected to any position in life get there by being unselfish - it is the will for power, however small that may be.
Brando
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By patrick carr Hi Brando, for someone who is not having a go at unions you seem to be doing a very good job.
What's with this "they aren't worth educating" the TUC has perfectly good tutors without you having to don another hat. Then you state "fit your mental picture of a typical union rep". By the way it,s a Brown book people were telling you to obtain, not a Black one. However i like how you signed off your post, "very few people who are elected to any position in life get there by being unselfish, it,s the will for power". If there are any vacancies arising at your estd, don't ring me i'll ring you. regards paddy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis Brandon i agree with what Paddy said may be you are the one with the problem not the reps. All good trade Union reps usually have more knowledge than there managers which managers dont like . Why dont you consider doing TUS training you might learn some think!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H Is it me getting old or has the English Dictionary changed recently?
The amount of grammatical and spelling mistakes on this posting is (to my eyes) extreme.
This begs the question - who are the posters?
Are they truly well educated Union Reps, Safety professionals, or just people trying to stir the dirt and have a verbal attack at other posters just because they are able to?
Standing by for a tirade of abuse!!
Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By patrick carr Dave Was going to reply, however it's friday night,been a busy week at work, another 88 redundancies at our place (construction) and sorry if i put a colon instead of a semi-colon in the wrong place. regards paddy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis Dave i wish i was as perfect as you obviousely nothing better to do than check spelling mistakes.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By IOSH Moderator We continue to view this thread with detached interest.
Please ensure the discussion stays within the the boundaries set by the Acceptable Use Guidelines otherwise the thread will be pulled.
That is all.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis To John if last message was towards me may i aplogize. I have been a Union safety rep for around 6years and for that have been suspended 6 times and redeyployed at least 4 times. i worked hard at getting my IOSH TECH which i am very proud of . I get a bit peed of when people tend to have a go at Union safety reps as they have an important role to play in the work place.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H Just to clarify - I was one of the first union elected Safety Reps in one of the companies I worked in back in the late seventies. I have witnessed deaths and serious bad practice in the olden days.
I then went on and spend 3 years as Chapel Rep before becoming shop steward for my work area.
Ended up as part of management team and so have seen the role of the Safety rep from all angles.
Know how you feel Patrick - but without you it could be worse.
Safety Reps have a vital part to play in Safety - if they have the right attitude - and if they have the backing of management. There needs to be some middle ground, but bad attitudes will entrench management and reduce the trust and commitment to negotiate and compromise.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By patrick carr Hi all Firstly i must convey my sincere apologies if i may of offended anyone by my remarks. I am in the same frame of mind as Jervis, i am very passionate in my role as a UCATT safety rep. I have been a shop steward for over 10 years where the consensus is management versus employee. However with the undertaking of the role of Union safety rep,in my experience it is a joint effort on behalf of all concerned to reduce accidents and ill health at the workplace.I have been employed by the same company for 30 years, and i have a great working relationship with all levels of management. I have had 70 days of TUC accredited training within the last 3 years. In march 2008 i subscribed out of my own funds for IOSH membership. On receipt of my TUC access certificate in occupational Health & Safety i am entitled to upgrade to TECH iosh. I joined IOSH to gain knowledge from people associated with the Institution. In 2005 i was UCATT (northern region) safety rep of the year. In 2005 i was nominated for TUC safety rep of the year. After a accident on one of our sites, where a worker fell through a unguarded stairwell our company was prosecuted by the HSE,a hefty fine was imposed. I was approached by the company H&S manager in order to try and resolve this problem that occurs during the construction of a dwelling. I devised a system that was adopted throughout our company.And yes Josh i am a scaffolder, and we can talk about M&E anytime you want. As i have been involved more and more with IOSH discussion forums, i do realise that my grammatical skills could be improved, however at this stage in my role as safety rep i am prioritising, there was still 77 construction worker fatalities in 2006/07. The need for amicable relationships between Employers and Trade Unions is a must to try and achieve a robust Health and Safety management system, that can reduce the accident, illness and fatalities that do occur in the workplace. When i start my CPD maybe a skills for life course from the TUC will count as a professional career development course? best regards paddy UCATT safety rep
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H Hi Paddy - I agree that my comments on spelling and grammar could be seen as sniping and self righteous. My argument was - what was the relevant qualities of the posters on this thread. A lot of people will jump on the bandwagon because they can, or have prejudiced views. You have stated that you are a member of IOSH and that is all i need to know. I can now take you seriously and am prepared tp offer any assistance that I can to assist you in any way. I take it from your last posting that you feel you are banging your head against a hard rock. But - stick in. But also - if you are preparing arguments or offering solutions to management then ensure it is to a standard that they cannot quibble about. If you are delivering to your members - also give them nothing to complain about. And some will look at spelling and grammar and will prejudge you. With your knowledge and experience, why not ask for funding for the NEBOSH Cert - move into an advisory role and take an active part in trying to save lives and reducing injuries. That is what I did and have to state that there are some sites that I am now banned from as an advisor, because there was strike action beckoning because of what I was advising the workers at a training session. My company heard me out and endorsed my actions, advice and opinions. Paddy - best of luck. If you wish to speak off forum then E mail me ddlwishhood@aol.com without the wish bit and I am sure we are more like "brothers" than you think. Am prepared to offer any assistance or just knock ideas about Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brando All,
Thanks for those who have responded - the thread seems to have gone at a tangent which may be my fault ( ! ).
The problem I have is not me or my other Managers or the Union but a couple of disruptive members of the Union.If Union readers of this thread can't accept that they have some bad apples then so be it - not my concern if people want to hide heads in the sand or be over sensitive.
I accept that some Union members do good work - we have some of them here to prove it. err...umm is that anti union?
Brando ( not Brandon! )
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis Brando you have good and bad every where including managers and may be the odd union rep!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter Farrell Dave,
when I completed the TUC cert. it was considered a higher qualification than the NEBOSH cert and still is.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew M Brando.
Union Reps are effectively just any employee. they have no right to sit on the committee.
And may only attend meetings if invited.
They do have a right to be consulted. However, this could consist roughly of telling them you are thinking of doing something, allow them to make a response, and then respond to their comments.
As for how many union safety reps. It depends on you, the union and your safety culture.
I might add that this is not how i work with the union. Although sometimes it is tempting....
Andrew
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis Dear Andrew Union reps are entitled to sit on safety commitees and do not HAVE TO BE INVITED they are also entitled to set up a commitee if one is not up and running as they have safety reps putting it forward this must be done i think with in 3 months of asking.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Jervis, only those committees convened under the 1976 regs. You have no automatic rights with regard to any other safety committees.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis My understanding is union safety reps can attend any safety committees if they put in writing !
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Even one convened for a different union representation area for example? What about a international safety committee in a multi-national company? What about a senior executive safety committee which will not discuss any business relevant to your members?
I fully support the work of union appointed safety reps but that is what they are. A means to consult and communicate with the represented members or other groups agreed with the company. Their remit and modus operandi are all encompassed within the 1976 Regs. (for the UK that is) Your comments are, I believe, founded in those Regs and are correct in that context.
I agree that in well run companies where there are UASR then it makes damn good business sense to have them positively on the team so to speak. Just that it doesn't have to be that way. So, if union reps want to use their committee in a certain way, for example as outlined by the original poster, that is up to them but it cannot be allowed to get in the way of the bigger picture. This is especially so where the level of union membership may be quite a small percentage of employees. An employer is charged with consulting and communicating with all employees and must have a means to do that effectively.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ITK I dont believe every eleted safety rep has the right to sit on all safety committe meetings, it depends on the constitution of that particular committee.
There are usually equal numbers of management and reps therefore it may not be possible for every rep to sit on the committee.
Also ust to be pedantic the SRSC Regulations are actually 1977 not '76.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew M As far as I am aware under the SRSC 77 regs.
If two union appointed reps put it in writing the company has to form a safety committee.
There is no regulation about them having to sit on it.
However as I said I would not like to run it that way. A lot of the time H&S reps are my eyes and ears. You just have read between the lines and side step the politics.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 ITK, correction noted, my error and as it is a legal reference I don't think it is pedantic to correct me. My excuse, it was such a long hot summer, my bones were much younger and I could still listen to very loud music. It obviously left a lasting impression in my mind.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.