Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 July 2008 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Elsdon Hi After changing my baby sons nappy on a mat on the floor of the disabled loo in the local Village Hall I made a recommendation that they fit a wall mounted baby changing table. I was told they looked into it before and couldn't fit one because of 'Health and Safety'. I've got no idea why H&S would prevent this. Perhaps it's safer to change a baby on a dirty loo floor than a dedicated mat! I suspect they are worried about being sued if the table came off the wall or the baby fell from the table. I've searched around and the only thing I can find is something in building regs saying these tables should not be fitted in a disabled loo. I note the word in the regs says 'should not' and not 'shall not' or 'must not' so this implies (to me) that if there is no choice then maybe this could be done - but I'm conscious there are various disability regs that also need to be considered. I hate people using H&S as an excuse when there appears to be no legitimate reason to do so - but perhaps I'm missing something? In my eyes, an appropriate CE marked table with clear safety warning signs, fitted with proper fittings by competent person and then inspected/maintained as necessary is all that's needed? The fact that it folds flat to around 100-150mm off the wall doesnt appear to me to imeded on disabled access but I am unsure. The tables couldnt go into separate mens/ladies as there is no space. What do people think - I'm sure ive seen changers in disabled loos before? Thanks, Mark
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 July 2008 22:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MP I think you summed up the reasons yourself "In my eyes, an appropriate CE marked table with clear safety warning signs, fitted with proper fittings by competent person and then inspected/maintained as necessary is all that's needed?" Cost is the issue here - not H&S Why not change the baby before you leave the house / take a changing mat with you / club together with other parents to endow a table.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 July 2008 07:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel I have worked in many such areas and there is no reason that I can think of where H&S have advised that a changing station cannot be placed at the appropriate height etc There are even changing facilities nowadays that automaticially allow for the different weights of babies and heights of mothers! Somebody somewhere does not want to spend £
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 July 2008 08:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch I'm sure positive encouragement to install the correct table would be given if everyone started changing their babies on tables in the hall as opposed to the floor of a toilet!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 24 July 2008 09:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Mark One of the issues here is that disabled toilets have a primary purpose of serving the needs of disabled persons. This would not be a problem as long as the number of potential nappy change users is not likely to impede use. The bigger problem however rests with the toilet dimensions themselves. Many such disabled facilities are shoehorned in with minimum dimensions only being met. Even a small reduction in dimension can be critical for some disabled users. At this time, quite rightly, there are regulatory requirements for disabled persons not baby changing. Without knowing the building I cannot comment on the possibility of alternative provisions for baby changing. I would however investigate the current disabled dimensions to establish just where they come in relation to the current regulatory needs. H&S is only an issue is if there is insufficient space for the disbled person and their assistant to undertake the necessary toilet operations. Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 24 July 2008 09:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Elsdon Thanks for the rapid responses. Money is always an issue, but its a thriving village and the various clubs involving young kids could raise the funds I'm sure. The issue regarding changing napies before leaving house doesnt apply - the one thing Ive learnt as a father is that you cannot predict a babies motions ;-) I suspected the issue over the disable loo size would be the issue. This village hall was constructed some 10+ years ago - and space was indeed a premium. Ive since read there has to be a 1500mm turning circle for disable use - where this is measured im unsure. I think I will take a look at the loo next time i'm in. The hall itself does not (like many halls) have a heavy usage by disabled persons so i suspect that it shouldn't cause a problem here.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 24 July 2008 10:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Mark If you can get a scaled drawing of the toilet you simply need to fit in a 0.75 metre radius circle somewhere in the open space!! Items affixed to the wall must be taken into account unless above head height, around 2m. I think the betting is that you have just 0.75 radius at best. Bob
Admin  
#8 Posted : 24 July 2008 14:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Elsdon Bob - Thanks for this. I'll check this but I suspect you are right - im not sure there is even 1500mm circle in the loo. Mark
Admin  
#9 Posted : 25 July 2008 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim I can probably add some confusion to this thread - my daughter is disabled and needs to be changed, she is now 7 years old and is usually changed on the dirty floor of disabled toilets, that are sometimes abused by able people who just cannot wait for their toilet to be free. There is some sympathy with parents of babies who sometimes find no changing table or mat but most places now have facilities for babies, not for changing disabled children. Personally I do not like to see parents of able babies using disabled toilets to change their babies, decent facilities for disabled are few and far between anyway. I just used a car park in Liverpool that has parking spaces for parents with children shared by disabled vehicles. Most of those spaces are occupied by non blue badge cars, (assume parents with children), while those of us with larger adapted cars have to find a space large enough to park our car in. We just can't park anywhere? I believe people who make rules for disabled should be disabled themselves otherwise they have no idea. Friday rant over!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 25 July 2008 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Crim Totally with you. I also resent the Chelsea tractor drivers who regard these bays as being designed specially for their oversize vehicles. Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 25 July 2008 16:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day Bob, given that a certain well known chelsea tractor has a footprint the same as the mondeo I suspect that it is more due to thier total inability to park properly - a sad reflection on the state of thier driving ability. As an aside a friend worked in a shop with disabled bays outside an able bodied man came in and asked if it was ok to use them, my friend replied "No problem, go ahead, as long as you don't mind me giving you a reason to need to use it". He went and parked another 10 bays down!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 25 July 2008 16:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Elsdon If only life were that simple! Crim I do agree with you. Modern shopping facilities like the new John Lewis in Cambridge have set a good example in providing dedicated baby changing / feeding facilities accessible by all. Unfortunately these are few and far between. I went to a cafe the other week with the kids and my wife was working. I desperately need to change the baby and the cafe had fitted a baby changing unit on the wall over the top of the toilet/sink. To use it I had to kneel on the loo! Its great that changing faciites are around - but they are so often in ladies loos. Us dads need a helping hand too. As for disabled and parent parking space, use by those not meeting these categories does make me so cross. Ive found myself pointing these issues out to the security guards at the local Tesco. I have to remind myself sometimes of something a boss said to me when I went into H&S - 'you can't change the world'. Have a safe w/end folks.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 27 July 2008 22:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karen Todd I actually feel safer changing a wriggly baby on the floor. Or else on the back seat of the car. Most of the shelf type ones I've seen have a harness and big warning stickers to make sure baby is strapped in, but I've seen a few with no harness - don't like the thought of trying to keep wriggly baby still on shelf with one hand and rummage around in changing bag with other hand. KT
Admin  
#14 Posted : 28 July 2008 08:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Haynes I know it might sound daft - but the baby changers 'without straps' [see previous posting] may well have been fitted by organisations that have been given 'legal advice' that straps might be considered as an aid to child abuse. I know of one such organisation, and also of 'Care Professionals' who support such advice
Admin  
#15 Posted : 28 July 2008 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Elsdon How ridiculous. What next - advice on unrestraiend child car seats? How can restraining a baby on a changer be considered child abuse - its obviously there to reduce the risk of baby rolling off. I know from personal experience (at home) that babies do fall off changers. A brief lapse in concentration whilst reaching for a nappy behind me - thankfully mine came to no harm. If the place has the opportunity to put in proper dedicated changing areas embedded in recessed benching with ample space for the menagerie of things we need to use - then risk is low. John Lewis Cambridge has an excellent set up for example. Where space is a premium, and fold up changers required, what harm can a short waist belt be?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 28 July 2008 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh Hi MP, your comment "why not change the baby before you leave the house" made me laugh! :) Very practical, but the next change will depend on how long you're out of the house for, and whether or not a no.2 is done, which cannot be left sitting there....
Admin  
#17 Posted : 17 September 2008 14:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By micheelgeorge The modern and sleekly styled Oeuf Baby Lounger is a nursery necessity. Securely attached with the 3 point safety belt, the baby lounger is basically where your baby hangs out. Lounger features a padded machine washable canvas seat made of 100% cotton.
micheel a href=http://www.superbabyguide.com rel="no follow" rel="do follow">SuperBabyGuide/a>
Admin  
#18 Posted : 17 September 2008 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By micheelgeorge The modern and sleekly styled Oeuf Baby Lounger is a nursery necessity. Securely attached with the 3 point safety belt, the baby lounger is basically where your baby hangs out. Lounger features a padded machine washable canvas seat made of 100% cotton.
micheel a href="http://www.superbabyguide.com" rel="no follow" rel="do follow">SuperBabyGuide/a>
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.