Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Coshh Assessor
Does anyone have any tips or suggestions for how to get across persuasively the idea of the hierarchy of controls? This is in an environment where the prevailing belief is that if something goes wrong it is somebody's fault and accidents won't happen if people are more careful and wear PPE.
I have some difficulty with seeing how to get it across because to me the hierarchy goes without saying - when I was first introduced to it I thought "yes, that makes perfect sense". But for others it is not so obvious and I need to convince them.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
If something goes wrong, it is nearly always someone's fault but the buck stops with management; lack of training, poor supervision, etc.
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jane Blunt
On the basis that I believe that people remember better things that are slightly amusing I devised a set of slides that has the hierarchy within the context of learning about the behaviour of cats.
Do you choose a lion or a domestic kitten?
If you have to have the lion - isolate the lion from you (behind a fence).
If you must get close and personal there is PPE (picture of someone in medieval armour)
Then there is the training option - a book on advanced lion taming.
All put together with free clipart. The members of the hierarchy that are not illustrated are talked about at relevant stages.
With a bit of imagination you can draw parallels with most work activities.
Jane
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tom Doyle
Get the offenders to work through the risk assessment with you. If they are involved in the process they will have a better understanding of the potential severity of harm and the likelihood of experiencing that harm. As the facilitator, work through the risk assessment leaving the PPE out of the risk control strategy. If the potentially hazardous situation is clearly explained to the workers, it is very likely that they will insist that PPE be used. That makes the PPE their idea, not yours.
This results in a number of benefits.
They will be trained on the potential hazards.
They will have been instructed on the reasons for using the PPE.
They will be engaged in the safety management process.
I have found that people are much more likely to follow instructions if they have partial ownership due to their involvement in the development process.
My two cents CAD
Tom Doyle
Industrial Safety Integration
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Kudos to you, Jane Blunt. An excellent approach if I may say so.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Coshh Assessor
Thankyou Jane - just the sort of thing I was looking for!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By warwick.jones
I favour using work at height as an example...
Eliminate - do the job from the ground e.g. long reach window cleaning poles etc
Reduce - reduce the height you need to work at or the time/frequency you need to be working at height e.g. wall mounted lights not ceiling mounted lights in workshops or using long life bulbs that do not need changing so often
Isolate - Barriers and edge protection
All of the above protects everybody! all of the time - then move onto those controls that require a little individual commitment to implement
Controls - Procedures, SSoW, Permits, etc. only work if followed
PPE - Harness and fall arrest which need to be worn and clipped on to be useful!
I also point out the importance of using a combination of controls aimed at reducing the Likelihood (reduced frequency, barriers etc.) and Severity (fall arrest harnesses, airbags/crash mats) and therefore risk!
regards
Warwick
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steph
I too use the lion scenario - to demonstrate how to do a risk assessment.
It really works.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.