Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley Hi all,
We have a skip for metals in our yard and every now and then we would call a company in to empty it. I wrote to them one day requesting for the usual H&S documents including a documented risk assessment on the activity carried out at our site. I received the relevant insurance documents and a letter saying that in his 32 years business in servicing skips, he has never had to supply a risk assessment and said there are too many things outside his control on our site to make a meaningful statement.
Need your opinions on this issue, please.
Thanks May
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Safe System Duties of employers under the HASAWA section 2 imply the need for risk assessments. Also the management of health & safety at work regs state 'the risk assessment shall be 'suitable & sufficient' and cover BOTH employees & non employees affected by the employers undertaking ....
I can think of numerous risks associated with that line of work and he has a legal duty to identify these and the those at risk, evaluate the level and ideally but not legally if he employs less than 5 people - Record them.
I suggest looking for a new skip guy as he speaks tosh. :)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Ask him to come around and with his help do a joint assessment specific to your yard. Keep it simple. Or you could go down the route of being horrified that such a situation exists, ask yourself how and why your company has appointed a contractor with this approach to H&S and find another one who shows a modern approach. However, you don't say what size this company is and not being able to produce a piece of paper doesn't mean that they are unaware of the risk or fail to control adequately. You choose. No doubt someone else will comment about the environmental or disposal management concerns that may also need a check given your discovery of their approach to safety management.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley Please correct me on this if I am wrong - does that mean he doesn't have to come up with a documented risk assessment if he employs less than 5 staff? I am aware of the written H&S policy requirement on this, but not the risk assessment.
Thanks May
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Safe System Thats correct - check HSE guidelines under 5 steps to risk assessment. BUT. If anyone reading this who employ less than 5 people and think that it will save them work ... JUST RECORD IT ANYWAY. IT can be simple AND it will help prevent injury and save lives.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley I think I better come up with one myself just to cover ourselves on this issue.
Thanks May
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim May, you need to carry out a risk assessment regarding the skip company on your premises, risks to your employees, to the skip driver etc.
The skip company is being negligent in not having their own. (I suggest they do have more than 5 employees).
Questions:
Have you competence checked the skip company, if not why not? Any competence check would require examples of previous risk assessments.
How does anyone prove they have done a risk assessment unless there is written evidence? Just a note in the diary will do but surely there will be some "Main Findings" from the delivery and use of a skip?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Safe System sent you an email
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SteveD-M Just to clarify matters a little (or muddy them!)
Everyone requires a risk assessment whether that be verbal or written. If you have more than 5 employees you need to record it.
So if he has told his guys about the hazards or has extensive experience in the field then...?
How he has demonstrated compliance would be in question. The employer shall have a duty to ensure the safety and health or workers in every aspect related of their work.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kenneth Patrick The skip man is not speaking "tosh" he is giving the facts he has never been asked in 32 years for an RA.
May - did you just ask him for an RA or did you invite him to your site to see what hazards there might be?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John A Wright May,
The risk assessment needs to be conducted by you and the skip man.
One of the main hazards I would think is workplace traffic and hazards to pedestrians etc etc which will be your responsibility or one of your site managers.
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley I have sent them a copy of our Code of Practices for Contractors, a copy to sign to confirm they have read it, a H&S questionnaire and Insurance questionnaire. I didn't receive any of them back, instead I got a copy of the waste licence, a copy of the certificate of employers' liability insurance and a letter which the contents I have posted here.
Thanks May
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley I will invite him to come over to do the risk assessment together with me, which I think he would come up with an excuse not to turn up, but at least I try.
Thanks May
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim May, is this the only skip company available to you?
It seems to me that there is a competence issue and potential for trouble in future.
I would be looking elsewhere for my skip supplier.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose You're right Steve, lets be clear about what the law requires. MHSW R3(1) requires that EVERY employer should carry out risk assessments. Under MHSW R3(6)a, those employers that employ 5 or more employees must then also record the SIGNIFICANT findings.
However, we all know that if we have gone to the trouble of carrying out the risk assessment, that we might as well record it for any number of reasons.
I don't think the skip operator is speaking 'tosh' but I would have thought that he would have a generic assessment in place. In fairness I am not sure if it reasonable to expect him to have a site specific assessment. I am just thinking of I were the skip operator whether I would carry out an assessment for each and every site. I doubt it! I would be surprised if you went to another skip company if they would give you a site specific assessment. Why not invite him over for a cuppa and help him put together a generic assessment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley We provide laundry service and I did a general risk assessment on garment delivery every 12 months. I would follow a driver out one day and carry out the RA based on the deliveries for that route. I don't understand why this company can't do it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philip McAleenan May,
Risk assessment is a process carried out continuously to determine whether the work activity requires further controls in respect of any hazards that may be present. The legal requirement is that any significant findings be recorded. Given that any such findings are significant they need to be dealt with before the activity proceeds and it follows that once satisfactorily dealt with there will be no significant findings, thus no further need for a record.
Controls for routinely conducted work activities that are fundamentally understood by anyone competent in that activity do not necessarily need to be written down. The competent driver will enter your premises and assess the situation as he proceeds and no doubt cease if he comes across any hazard for which he isn’t prepared. If you are aware of any hazards in your workplace that he hasn’t come across before, i.e. any new hazards, let him know so that he may take appropriate action on his next visit; though no doubt you will l already have addressed these and remedied the situation so that he is not put at risk.
Given that he has 32 years experience in his business, I am sure you will accept that he is competent to continue to service the skips at your premises. Health and safety is not driven by paperwork, but by competent practice. Seek essential paper work, such as evidence of his current insurance status, but not unnecessary stuff. The rational for a written risk assessment for his activities on your site implies that he must have hundreds, if not more written risk assessments for all the sites that he visits each year, and that is to say the least, impracticable.
Regards, Philip
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Phillip, I agree completely with your comments. This thread is a good example of the reality of life in the world beyond the steamy heights of major construction and large manufacturing and blue chip companies. We have a huge pool of SME in this country that society depends upon. Some contract help and others provide it. The vast majority of small businesses do not have the formal systems that one might expect in larger undertakings. There is a school of thought that suggests they are actually safer in the workplace because they have recognised and controlled their significant risks through practical experienced application and have the ability to assure those controls amongst their employees in a very direct manner not available to larger concerns. They may not entirely meet the detailed legal requirements in all aspects but I venture to suggest that many companies fit that category. That of course being the reason why the big players have been leading an improvement process for their sectors for many(some may say too many)years. My view is that in such circumstances, it is always better to attempt some on the spot partnership before condemning the small business simply because they cannot produce the paper you asked for. A reminder that he said he had never been asked for one, not that he had never risk assessed. The route of requiring all to fit a one size approach will cost your company money without necessarily improving safety in the workplace.
To be clear, I am not saying it is acceptable to use unsafe contractors. I am just challenging the view that they are unsafe simply because they do not have a piece of paper.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Richards Is this a "cash-and-no-questions-asked" scrap metal recovery scheme ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose Yep, tend to agree with the last couple of 'significant' responses. I would also add that people shouldn't fall into the trap of assuming that the completion/possession of a risk assessment means that risks are being controlled and conversely that the absence of a risk assessment means that risks aren't being controlled.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By May Warley Hi all,
Being new on H&S, I still have a lot to learn. Thanks for your comments and I'll take them on board. Feel like an idiot now but life still goes on.
Best regards May
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By al wood why tolerate this guy!
inform your superiors of his failure to comply with your reasonable request and recommend that he is removed from yor supply chain with immediate effect, and make sure you put this in writing.
how many chances do you have to give someone!
if he aint playing ball get rid of him.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SteveD-M May Please don't take an criticism as a result of this issue. You knew to ask the question.
Don't take too much heed of some rather right wing approaches. Remember there needs to be a balanced approach.
Well done for identifying this and keep up the good work.
Have a nice day.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 May, always remember there is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid answers. I have been playing with H&S for 30 years and I still ask questions everyday, perhaps the difference is that I can spot the stupid answers a little easier today than I could 30 years ago? Keep up the good work and never fear this forum, we are all just a load of softies really.
Pete
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.