Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#41 Posted : 01 July 2009 14:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By mgribbin I have found this document that really helps with determining who is a user http://www.visionexpress...ecare/VDUlegislation.pdf hope this helps
Admin  
#42 Posted : 01 July 2009 16:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still As both a spectacle wearer and DSE user I've watched this thread with a mixture of interest and amazement! The regs seem very clear to me. Incidentally, testing is free under the NHS for certain categories of people - for example mine are free because my mother suffered from glaucoma, so I am entitled to a free annual test. My employer will pay for "basic" single vision lenses, but the £50 doesn't go very fay against my high-index varifocals! Peter
Admin  
#43 Posted : 01 July 2009 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Slightly off thread, but another question - do employers out there allow employees time off for the eye tests under the DSE Regs? I know that time off is not mentioned in the regs, just wondering what is considered normal practice.
Admin  
#44 Posted : 01 July 2009 16:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Don't you think even those £50 is burden on the employer for poor sight due to a genetic defect.
Admin  
#45 Posted : 01 July 2009 17:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Swis, I'd never thought of myself as genetically defective before! Yes, It's a burden on my employer. So are my wages and expenses, but presumably they feel I'm still just about worth employing. They could of course move me to a role in which I didn't have to spend most of my working hours on a computer, and thereby save the 50 quid, but that assumes I could do something else that brought equal value to the business. Peter
Admin  
#46 Posted : 01 July 2009 17:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose This thread is still going! genetic defect!!!!!!!!!!
Admin  
#47 Posted : 02 July 2009 10:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Sorry Peter, Communication error - my post should've included the words 'potential' and 'possible'. Also, although my post was a response to your comments but it never meant to target you personally, it was a statement in general. However, I apologise for my poorly laid post anyway.
Admin  
#48 Posted : 02 July 2009 11:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Swis, No problem, it caused a lot of amusement around the office! I'm not going to split hairs about whether or not an inheritable condition results from a genetic defect, but thanks anyway for the apology! Peter
Admin  
#49 Posted : 02 July 2009 11:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Thanks Peter. P.S. Almost all inheritable conditions are due to some sort of genetic defect.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
2 Pages<12
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.