Rank: Guest
|
Posted By safetyamateur
My understanding of this issue is based on point 17 of Appendix 2 to the DSE Regs:
"Medical evidence shows that using DSE is not associated with permanent damage to eyes or eyesight; nor does it make existing defects worse".
I take this to mean there is no connection between the use of DSE and a detrimental effect on eyesight that may require correction with spectacles, for example.
I understand there are those among us that don't agree with this and I'm very interested a to why.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By stephen d clarke
Hi,
I think the issue is that if someone has a pre-existing eye condition then working with DSE might highlight this as excessive use without breaks can cause tired eyes. Count your blink rate when using a PC it will probably be about 3-4 per minute, then count it when doing anything that doesn't require staring at a screen it will probably be about 20 blinks per minute. Similar to contacts I believe.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By safetyamateur
Thanks, stephen.
Should have prefixed this by explaining that a couple of posters on the other DSE thread seem to be saying that a permanent problem (i.e. requiring specs) can result from prolonged use of DSE.
For me, eyestrain, fatigue etc. are short term effects and have no influence on whether you need specs or not.
Only my take on it, based on the guidance. And I'm keen to learn more about the alternative view (no pun intended).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By FAH
Nice start Safety Amateur.
I'm sure that there are readers of these threads who have a very wide range of understanding about WHY the DSE Regs specifically require the exposed employee to be provided with suitable eye tests. Let's hope that some will contribute here.
To kick this off, my standard reference document [apart from the L26 -DSE Regs] is the report from the Royal College of Opthalmic Surgeons which discusses DSE eye tests, what tests & questions should be asked and how the tests should be conducted.
Over to everyone else as I don't wish to use this as a personal soapbox.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By safetyamateur
Hang on, FAH. I started this thread at your suggestion.
You agreed with Bob Shill's quote. And his contention was that prolonged use can result in specs being necessary.
Have I got to read the docs you just quoted?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bannister
The eyetest bit in the Regs is to do with ensuring that if a persons eyesight changes so that use of DSE requires specs, then this can be identified.
The assertion that DSE use does not cause permanent eye changes is, I understand, correct, given current knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MickN
I wear glasses and I've had a number of eye tests down through the years. As a rule, our eyesight is constantly changing ever so slowly. For most of us this means that we are getting progressively farsighted. Hence the increased need for reading glasses as we get older.
What most people are actually noticing, when they complain of DSE discomfort, is their "natural prescription" which under normal circumstances they do not notice. Given an eight hour shift in front of a computer screen, the resultant strain accumulated over this time needs to be handled properly.
If you are only slightly near or far sighted you may not even be aware of it. You go to the optician and he tells you you don't need glasses. Then you're left wondering why squinting at your DSE hurts your eyes.
Mick
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CFT
Hi Frank
On-form as per usual which is great and a pleasure to see you back participating. Anyway my take on this, it is (IMHO) a much abused requirement, that rarely permits a company to differentiate between single vision lenses that may be required for constant DSE work and the two-yearly eyesight test that a spec wearing individual will undertake.
I've heard it, I'm sure you have; that on occasions an employee will use the contribution of £75 - £100 plus test (NHS) not a DSE visual test, towards new bins and be very pleased to have had a contribution. The regulations are reasonably specific in there descriptive manner,it is the employer that frequently does not understand what the actual requirements are.
Recently someone came to claim their test costs plus £100 towards lenses specific to working on DSE; when I asked why, they said "cos it's a perk innit?"
"But" said I, "you wear specs for distances & the DSE report does not identify any need to wear them when working with screens" (oh to have such quality close-up eyesight) " I know but like I said I have had the contribution for ages!" And so on....
However and all things considered, I will continue with the testing for users as I just wouldn't want to compromise the duty of care I have for these individuals a per pros the DSE regulations among other things.
On a personalside I have spent some time on this subject (probably for my own benefit as I wear bins for DSE use) I wanted to try to establish if any long term harm was possible; I along with 'safety' have concluded that I see little signs of evidence to suggest long term problems as long as siple instructions are followed by way of DSE assessments; I have found it to be quite temporary.
Certain conditions really should be met, and an area frequently overlooked by 'assessors' is the brightness of the screen v lighting conditions v depth of field values, get that wrong and you can have users with quite significant (all be-it) temporary problems.
My eyes will get worse and time goes by (for certain, along with many other users). Will the DSE use bring it on any quicker? I can't find a conclusive and definitive answer based on facts that says it will.
Must dash, I have just realised I don't make a claim :_)
CFT
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose
I am not an optician/optometrist so I have tended to take the guidance in L26 at face value, i.e. that using DSE does not cause permanent eye problems.
However, SA I am not sure that I agree with the final; part of your statement
'..eyestrain, fatigue etc. are short term effects and have no influence on whether you need specs or not'.
While eye strain may well be a temporary condition, I would have thought that it could very well be caused by someone who is either not using specs when they actually need them or them having specs that do not include the prescription for the required viewing distance.
Isn't 'eye strain' a common reason while people go and have their eyes tested and subsequently end up with glasses? I know I did; I was straining to read small print, it was causing 'eye strain' but when I got my 'bins' all was OK again.
So - surely if you need specs but don't have them then you may suffer from 'eye strain' with your eyes trying to compensate. So conversely if you have eye strain then you may well need glasses.
Connection/influence - Only a thought!
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By FAH
Hi again y'all
Thanks for compliment CFT [it was, wasn't it?]
safetyamateur.
It's most unfortunate that you have misunderstood me so badly.
I agree that I suggested that we start a new thread as we had done the legal issue to death and were moving into the "why" of eye correction possibly being required.
I also agree with Bob Shillabeer as to the statement as quoted.
I am as interested as you in expanding my knowledge on this topic.
We had got to a point on the previous thread where we were discussing whether DSE use actually caused eye problems; and whether they might be permanent or temporary.
My understanding is that current knowledge indicates that DSE use does not normally cause permanent problems in eyes but that temporary problems - primarily relating to eye control & focus - are created by such work.
These temporary problems tend to be identified by such very personal & subjective phenomena as headaches, dry eye & similar symptoms. Some of these have been discussed already, although I must confess that I'd hoped for rather more positive conclusions.
The only potentially permanent aspect of eye problems that I believe occurs is for contact lens users; & this arises because we all blink less [previously mentioned] at DSE. For contact lens users this can, I believe, cause ulcers which can sometimes permanently scar the eye surface.
I shall look forward to any contribution that helps to clarify these issues.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By safetyamateur
Many thanks for all the contributions.
I'll maintain my original position on this, then.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.