Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 April 2009 21:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic Sitting on the M25 today, traffic stopped, nothing to do so I carried out visual survey on the famous smoking ban; sad I know. I counted 20 lorries and observed the drivers. 14 out of 20 were smoking in their cabs. Some of these lorries were owned by big name companies. I had to ask myself 'are these regulations working or are they selective and only apply to the poor Joe soap who works in the factory,office or enjoys a fag with his pint'.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 April 2009 22:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter To add variety, next time count the seatbelt or mobile 'phone offenders. Are we there yet?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 April 2009 01:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim Last week at my overnight hotel I saw a sign outside the pub that read "no smoking within 10 metres of the building". Is this correct, if so why do people get away with smoking just outside the entrance?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 April 2009 07:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SteveD-M Audited a hospital and all around the oxygen tank and storage area were fag butts...this was when the hospital policy of no smoking had been in for a long time... The smokers were throwing the butts through the doors fo the storage area as they shouldn't be smoking there.. No enforcement. Most think that by putting up the sign (no smoking within 10m) they are complying with their insurance requirements...they may be wrong...
Admin  
#5 Posted : 08 April 2009 09:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic Within 2 weeks of the smoking ban one of my companies was inspected by the local council. They were very interested in looking at all our company vehicles to see if there were "No Smoking" signs displayed in the front and back seats. They then went on to inspect the exit doors to see if they had the correct signs. I having nothing better to do, ha ha, accompanied them, they really done a thorough job looking at "No Smoking' signs to see if they said 'No Smoking' and apparently they only get 17K pa for doing this interesting and vital.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 08 April 2009 09:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp There are two issues here. First, I think the requirements of the smoking ban went OTT in respect to company vehicles. Second, it is very difficult to enforce. Whether a law is effective will depend on the level of punishment for getting caught and the likelihood of detection. Hence some people still use mobile phones whilst driving as well as speeding and other motoring offences.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 April 2009 09:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By clairel One the one hand the law is the law on the otherhand I have some sympathy with long distance lorry drivers. I think it more goes to show that blanket bans are ineffective. Just like hard hat zones being daft for a roofer. Or 20 mile an hour zones outside schools duing the holidays or at three in the morning. I'm an ex-smoker and hate the smell of smoking and so I am chuffed to bits that everywhere is smoke free. However, I feel sorry for places like the working mens clubs where they can't designate a smoking room. As long as the staff aren't forced to work in there then what is the problem. Customers can go to the non smoking area to get a pint and then be asked to take their glass back when finished. Clean the room when it's empty (I can't see the risk from the smell of stale smoke myself). Same with lorry drivers. If it's only them in the cab at the time then I can't see the problem. Sure the smell isn't nice if someone gets in at a later date but there's no risk surely? Isn't that what the law was about, preventing risk? However, how come it's not illegal to smoke whilst driving but it its illegal to drink (soft drinks), eat or use a phone. Lighting a fag is just a dangerous and I had a fair few come back in the window when I threw them out. Now that's dangerous. Seems contradictory, the law, to me.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 08 April 2009 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic I agree with Raymond, it is well over the top. Yes smoking shouldn't be allowed in office etc but to send those who smoke to a shed with one wall and a roof is ridiculous. I have watch these people standing in all weathers trying to draw smoke from their fag. To me this encourages people to smoke in work in places where they shouldn't, consequently adding to a fire risk. As for pubs; I like a pint and when people smoked in pubs it wasn't to bad, I could move. Now in order to get into the pub I am faced with a dozen people all outside the main door puffing away. When I first experienced this I thought I was going in to a burning building. But the worst thing is the smell. Every pub entrance smells of old smoke and most shops, like hairdressers etc stink as you walk by.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 08 April 2009 09:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AMelrose Agree that the doorway isn't the best place to smoke but still prefer that to having to sit next to someone with a fag in hand inside the building where I may not have any control over opening windows etc. Clothes no longer smell like a full ashtray at the end of the night and can eat food without having to eat the smoke from the next table at the same time. As for lorry / van drivers - if there are no other people using their vehicle (or sharing) and they aren't distracted lighting up or throw their butt out the window etc then it's only their health they are affecting. Have done the "count" myself on a 25 mile journey and was up to 43 when I turned into the car park where I work. Then there's counting car drivers with fog lights on and no fog..or no lights and really foggy... Oh the joys of driving!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 08 April 2009 10:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67. Hi, as has been said, policing the smoking ban in vehicles is almost impossible (as is mobile phone use),..other than by employers who can readily detect if smoking has been taking place in a vehicle. Whilst I am anti smoking and very happy with the ban and dont have much sympathy for smokers in their "shelters", I cant ever recall, in the bad old days, a smoker ever asking me if it was ok to light up next to me in a pub,cafe etc.etc. I don't really have an issue with LDD's smoking in their vehicle. re the 10m from a property... there is nothing in regs or guidance to say how far away a smoker should be..but it does say that second hand smoke should not be able to re-enter a building from the designated smoking areas..as an aside and probably a further "go" at smokers.. why do the think it is ok to make me "run a gauntlet of them" every time i go into or leave a building particularly pubs??? Cheers.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 08 April 2009 10:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By clairel Don't think they are doing it on purpose. Oddly I was discussing this with a lady the other day who is about 8 weeks into her 'giving 'up' (been 10 years for me). We both agreed that when you are a smoker you don't realise how much other people can smell your cigarette or (even worse) how badly you smell of smoke. It mortifies me that I used to smell like that! However, oddly I have always hated the smell of stale smoke, even when I was a smoker! I find even the smell of smoke outdoors offensive nowadays. I was on a ferry last year and after wading my way past all the hoards of smokers in their smoking area at the entrance to the decks (why do I have no option but to walk through their smoking area!) I was relieved to stand on the deck and take in the fresh air. Someone walked past me with a fag in their hand and politely I told them they couldn't smoke at this location only in the smoking area.I got a mountain of abuse back. But thinking back, as a smoker I would have been the same because I just didn't take into account how much it offended non-smokers. So much as the smokers irritate me I can sort of understand as I was exactly the same once.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 08 April 2009 10:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By clairel PS, Counting smokers in vehicles is a bit sad to be honest. Stick on the radio or a CD and chill!!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 08 April 2009 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sen Sar Warderic I feel they work, they have so far stopped me enjoying a ciggie: On the plane On the train On the bus In the pub In the Cinema Well just about everywhere except a drafty doorway !!
Admin  
#14 Posted : 08 April 2009 12:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic clairel, I said at the start it was sad but I can be a lot sadder. I remember once counting the disable car parking spaces in a Sainsburys car park, 36 in total, all empty and I had nowhere to park. I knew people wouldn't believe me so I took a couple of pictures. Its not that I am a sad person generally, its that I get up tight when things go over the top and make us H&S people look like monsters. Regarding smoking, I don't smoke but I have sympathy for those that do. Look at the poor old soul that likes a pint and a cigar on a Friday night. With a decent cigar they must be outside all night.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 08 April 2009 13:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charles Robinson Tech IOSH No body gives a thought for the poor tobacco manufactures’ that have to go to third world counties (to make a killing) in order to replace profits lost due to the smoking ban. Yes the smoking ban is for health reasons nicotine is an addictive drug a fact that was denied for years. If as a result the poor chap that used to enjoy a cigar with his pint lives a few more years in reasonably good health with all his limbs. Can not see the benefit I pity him
Admin  
#16 Posted : 08 April 2009 14:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic Charles; not all smokers are walking around with one leg, not all smokers are coughing up a lung. Some people enjoy the occasional smoke and some, in the bad old days, enjoyed that smoke with a pint. However, the TV adds tell us every nigh that drinking is bad for us and eating all the foods we like are bad for us too. Do you suggest that we don't smoke, don't drink and sit around eating salad with no salt. If that's the case I would sooner have a fine cigar at Christmas, a pint on a Friday night, salt on my lunch, loose a couple of years, but enjoy what I had. What this has to do with lorry drivers smoking I don't know.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 08 April 2009 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sen Sar Just for Charles, slightly off topic sorry Warderic! Having been fortunate enough to visit many "third world countries" many actually do have smoking bans.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 08 April 2009 14:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charles Robinson Tech IOSH While we may be advised that many products and habits that we indulge in are not healthy and we may even become dependant on some them they are not addictive. I did not raise the issue of people enjoying a pint and a cigar but fact remains once addicted to smoking it is very difficult to kick the habit yes some third world countries do have smoking bans but manufactures still target these developing countries to market there products. I don’t think I need to go into the health effects of smoking there are people that smoke all there lives and live to a very old age but this is not the norm visit some of the chest wards in hospital and see the effects yourself. Indeed drinking alcohol in excess can be just as bad
Admin  
#19 Posted : 08 April 2009 14:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Confessions of a pipe smoker : I'm quite happy with the bans as applied in various countries and comply with them as required. A puff can always wait. (just waiting for the warm weather so I can smoke on the terrace while taking a coffee) Sooon. Late last year I spent a couple of weeks in the local teaching hospital. Was pleased to note that the area outside the main door was fully equipped with a large bronze ashtray. Usually about a dozen of us surrounding it at all hours. Actually, not ALL hours. Main doors were locked, for security reasons, from midnight to 6am. But the (us) light sleepers easily found which emergency exit doors were blocked open for the convenience of staff. Some patients came out with drip trolleys, some in wheelchairs, some with oxygen cylinders. The fun bit was watching someone with an oxygen mask trying to smoke. Seeing them flicking away with a lighter then going Puff, breathe. Puff, breathe. Puff, breathe ... was quite, er, breath taking (?) Must get one of those electric thingies. Merv
Admin  
#20 Posted : 08 April 2009 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic I think you hit the nail on the head Charles when you said "excess". Problem is the minority want the majority to give up everything totally that they consider not to be good for you. Still don't know what this has to do with lorry drivers.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 08 April 2009 15:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67. Well everyone knows truckers have all the bad habits: smoking, bad diet, no exercise..probably drink too much at weekends..pollute the air with fuel fumes.. hmm anything else..not that i am being "judgemental" haha finish tonight for Easter break..have a nice weekend.. be careful rolling those eggs!!!!!!!!!! Cheers
Admin  
#22 Posted : 08 April 2009 15:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charles Robinson Tech IOSH I once as an electrician serviced nebulisers used by smokers to aid their breathing you would not believe the build up of tar inside of these machines many were so contaminated they had to be destroyed as for lorry drivers the regulations are there to protect their health as well plus they are driving in a work place that may be shared by others.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 08 April 2009 15:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sen Sar Carlsberg dont do truckers but if they did.................................. Ah well back to reality.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 09 April 2009 09:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By toby liberson Back to the original post, are they breaking the smoking ban? I ask because there is an exemption from the ban for employees who have sole use of a vehicle and even some of the big name companies have franchise drivers who own their own vehicles (I am thinking of at least one ready mix concrete company)
Admin  
#25 Posted : 09 April 2009 09:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic Liberson: Good comment I know about the one driver/occupier rule but I didn't think of owners of cabs who transport for big companies. Just shows how you can improve your thinking when you discuss these things; bit like a risk assessment I suppose.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 09 April 2009 10:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charles Robinson Tech IOSH Regulation 11 provides for most enclosed vehicles which are used by the public or used for work purposes to be smoke-free, but aircraft and most ships and hovercraft are excluded. “Vehicle” is defined in section 5(5) of the Health Act 2006 to include trains. In Scotland however there is an exemption as below. The ban will also extend to cover vehicles used for business purposes. Individuals using their private or company car for business purposes will, however, be exempt.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 09 April 2009 14:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By graeme12345 Warderic, how many "compartments" in your vehicles, don't let the incompetents get away with it
Admin  
#28 Posted : 09 April 2009 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By warderic My vehicle, incompetents, compartments: not me, its what I saw.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.