Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Eastbourne
Hi gang
Was there once a rule that the fire alarms need testing four times a year and each time 25% of the fire alarm system was to be checked with the oher 75% visually inspected and now it is twice a year and each visit it is recommended that at least 50% are inspected and there is a written record of this but the other 50% still needs to be visually inspected?
Maybe a better question to ask would be how many times a year must the fire alarm system be checked/maintained and what should such a regime cover, for example, detectors, sounders, call points and the main panel? Does every single detector, sounder and call point need to be inspected or just 50% with the other 50% visually inspected?
I haven't searched this and am a bit reluctant to now after having written the above so sorry if this has been mentioned before.
Kind regards
Mark
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jervis
Hello Mark isnt a weekly test !
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By clairel
Isn't it odd, I'd never heard about this 50% lark before then a client asks me today and you post this today...wierd!!
-Daily check of panel
-Weekly alarm check (from a different call point if relevant)
-6 monthly check of system by competent fire engineer
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Hammer
Does not have to be 6 monthly only. Subject to risk assessment for competent engineer and not exceeding 6 months between inspections, You must carry out at least 2 inspections over a 12 month period. Most will split that into Quarterly inspections covering 25%, so that a full inspection is covered over the 12 months. Or others do 50% which is 6 monthly.
The weekly testing is to test the system using a different MCP on rotation, not the MCP. Over 12 months test all MCP's and detectors, inspect analogue detector levels, check alarm devices, cable fixings etc etc.
Obviously if you have a unmanned site with only 3 or so MCP, you can justify the MCP tests are not done weekly, but say quarterly.....but that is another story/RA
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By clairel
That's not what the fire guide says.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter F
Jervis,
the weekly check you refer to is the break glass, they should be tested 1 a week per area over a thirteen week cycle.
We have quartly checks, with 50%. but I think it all depends on your R/A and the business.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By clairel
...by the way I wasn't being antagonistic, just curious as to where you got your information from as (like I said) that's not what the fire guide says.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Worth
All this is from course notes so you may want to check original sources :)
RRO - Equipment needs to be maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good repair
BS5839
Every Device must be tested at least once per year
The control panel and stand-by batteries should be checked at a minimum of 6 monthly intervals.
Weekly testing should be carried out by user comprising a single call point test for small sites. If more than 50 call points may require more than one per week.
Also check out the guidance packs if you haven't already -
http://www.communities.g...iresafety/firesafetylaw/
http://www.communities.g...ons/fire/firesafetyrisk3
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Hammer
BS5839-1 States the testing requirements.
However this is best practice and in very small cases your competent fire engineer RA and also your FRA should highlight when say weekly MCP tests are not practicable.
For example a residential property that may have 3 or 4 MCP's and the entrance is secure may not require weekly MCP tests with being unmanned and may be acceptable to conduct monthly or even quarterly checks instead. Obviously your RA will highlight this.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Hammer
What is your query clairel??
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By graeme12345
check with your insurer on what they require you to do, but for starters test one different call point every week and carry out at least 2 evacs every year and ensure all know what to do when they hear the alarm/ if they discover a fire.
Practise saves lives
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Hammer
Everyone seems to be quoting guidelines.
We are moving away from prescriptive ideals in fire safety, with the first big change coming from FSO and now with BS9999.
It is all about risk assessing the property, people at risk, fire hazards etc etc first.
If I had a small office 2 storey with 7 staff, would I recommend at least 2 evacs per year?
Aspire to BS, but it can not always be hence we should risk assess.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By clairel
Richard,
My query is that you have mentioned a variety of testin schedules including 25% of the system quarterly being an option.
I was wondering where you got that info from as the fire safety guides state:
'six monthly servicing and preventative maintenance should be carried out by a competent person with specialist knowledge of fire warning and automatic detection systems'
This implies to me a full test of the system every 6 months, which is not optional. Which is what I tell my clients. So where did you get your info from?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Malcolm Greenhouse
My understanding is that call points need testing every 3 months (quarter). This could either mean testing every point once every three months or testing a proportion of the call points at regular frequenceis so that every point is tested at least every 3 months. e.g. if you had 13 call points in a system you would check one a week (different point each week)If you had more than 13 but less than 26 you would check 2 per week etc.
The logic behind this was that the number of soundings at each test was kept to a minimum. You could also tie it in to fire alarm familiarisation test. This is were you state that at each Tuesday at 10:00 the fire alarm will be tested (if heard at any other time treat as real). We also ask the tester to listen to the audibility of the alarm as they tested each point to identify if sounders were working.
Needless to say the numbering of the call points and the recording of the number of points tested had to be entered in the fire log book to ensure that points were not missed.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Hammer
Got my info from BS5839-1 2002 clause 45.2/3, The NEBOSH Certificate Fire Safety and Risk Management book page 76, a tutor on a fire managers course and of course the fire engineers themselves.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By clairel
Then i wonder why the Fire Guide says different?
Anyone??
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Hammer
Because their advice is not wrong, so long that all required maintenance is conducted within the 12 month period and no longer than 6 monthly apart. It is that your option is not the only one and you could do it in various stages.
So technically it is not wrong, but it is wrong if it states that is the only method you can do it in.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Messy Shaw
clairel, I am with Richard with this one.
There is currently many (perhaps too many) guides available right now. In addition to the DCLG FS suite of Guides (to which I think you are referring) there are
The LACORS Guide for housing,
A raft of BS guides for anything from alarms and emergency lighting,
BS 9999 a 450 page document explaining how to risk assess using engineering principles
Approved Doc B Building Regs
and many more
Then some individual fire authorities have their own guidance, much of it available on the www
Add to that mix, various advice from education authorities, licensing authorities, etc etc - its all a mess.
But there is only one definitive document. The RR(FS)O 2005.
The rest are, in effect, guides to show you different ways around a particular problem in a specific situation
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Very modern systems are self-testing, so is there really still a need to go round "testing" call points the old fashioned way when you have a new system?
At weekly sounder check, remember to ASK the people in the various areas if they HEARD the alarm. Not unknown to come across "perfect" records of tests in the Log Book, but have areas of the workplace where (for a variety of reasons) the alarm couldn't be heard.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GaryC40
Breathing life into an thread..
Before i start trawling through guidance of all sorts can anyone clarify if an organisation with 1 (yes 1) employee (likely that public or visitors will regularly be in the premises)is obliged to record weekly fire alarm tests? Also is there guidance on locations of muster points for offices in busy streets etc? The closest space for a muster area in this instance is over a busy road. We are a landlord and the prospective tenant is not wanting to record anything, however i have insisted they completed a FRA for their areas of control for the property, irrespective of the 5 employee rule. I also feel that they should carry out the weekly alarm test and record it. They have been gifted the property for a limited period hence why i think it is not asking too much for them to do this as good practise.
Any thoughts?
Gary
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GaryC40
Any views on the following...
Before i start trawling through guidance of all sorts can anyone clarify if an organisation with 1 (yes 1) employee (likely that public or visitors will regularly be in the premises)is obliged to record weekly fire alarm tests? Also is there guidance on locations of muster points for offices in busy streets etc? The closest space for a muster area in this instance is over a busy road. We are a landlord and the prospective tenant is not wanting to record anything, however i have insisted they completed a FRA for their areas of control for the property, irrespective of the 5 employee rule. I also feel that they should carry out the weekly alarm test and record it. They have been gifted the property for a limited period hence why i think it is not asking too much for them to do this as good practise. As previously stated the business will attract many visitors so the 1 employee's scenario is largely irrelevant.
Any thoughts?
Gary
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.