Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 May 2009 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Shaw Hi, I've just been carrying out Risk Assessments on some of our Woodworking Machinery and have question regarding the Full Cutter / 4 way planer. Our is fully enclose with an interlock guard and a 30 sec delay before the guard can be opened. However, the machine is not braked and takes most of those 30 seconds to stop completely. The HSE woodworking Info sheet 40 seems to suggest that all such machines should be braked to 10 Secs by Dec 2008. I have ordered the ACOP from the HSE but am awaiting delivery, in the meantime, can anyone tell me if this is in fact the case. Many Thanks Andrew
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 May 2009 10:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Andrew, As long as the machines stops before the guard can be opened there is no need to fit braking. While you're wating for the ACOP you can download the Woodworking information sheet wis38 from the HSE web site at www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/wis38.pdf
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 May 2009 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Whilst I appreciate Peter's sensible comments and in the common sense world P would get my vote every time However I am confident [off the top of the head without looking up the detail] that technically the machine should be braked irrespective of the guarding situation; which appears to be very good - There is/was a lead in period which you should check
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 May 2009 12:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Bob, Thanks for your complimentary comments. The HSE Woodworking Information Sheet WIS38 states clearly that if the risk assessment shows that there is no added safety benefit, then braking does not have to be provided. You're right, there was a transition period for fitting braking, but it seems clear from the description that braking is not required in this case. WIS38 does however point out that braking can increase productivity by achieving more rapid stopping for setting, adjustment etc. The ACOP doesn't really add much but does have greater authority than the information sheet.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 May 2009 12:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Shaw Thank you both for your comments. I have now downloaded WIS 38 as you suggested. As you suggest the retro fitting of braking in this situation would not increase safety however, I take on board the comments about productivity too. We are a bespoke joinery workshop and through-put is not really an issue. I shall study the ACOP when it arrives. Thank you both once again
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.