Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 June 2009 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brookie
We have just been asked to supply a HAVS certificate with some new tooling we have supplied for a customer.

Does anyone know about this please? ie does the manufacturer have to supply when we bought it?

Thanks....
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 June 2009 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali
I think what they mean is evidence of the vibration emissions rating, which the employer will be able to use to calculate the exposure values, although strictly speaking not all manufacturers ratings are accurate (except makita).
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 June 2009 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brookie
We have been told it is 1.21 m per sec... is that all they would need to know??
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 June 2009 16:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Y
Makita among all manufacturers are accurate?!!!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 June 2009 16:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali
..the units are in m/s/s, just like with acceleration. Yse, if you could give them the record with it on - the values may be measured on one axis or more therefore giving you one or more values.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 June 2009 19:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose
Most manafacturers supply vibration data for their kit. Being slightly cynical I would suggest that much of the data is probably derived from testing that is done under 'ideal' conditions.

I went to a HAVS seminar a couple of years back run by EEF and the HSE. The HSE "vibration guru's" were there and they essentially said that the accurate measure of HAVs was very difficult, and that consecutive measurements of the same piece of kit with the same piece of kit could yield significantly different results each time.

I am not convinced that there is a wholly accurate way to measure vibration but we have to live with what we have.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 04 June 2009 19:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose
By the way - I would have thought that an RMS value across all 3 axis would be the most accurate
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.