Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Elliot Morton
Hi Everyone
I have been told that we cannot use wooden ladders any more (general use and construction) and must use Aluminium ladders.
Is this correct?
Thanks in advance for your advice
regards
Elliot
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By A Campbell
Don't know of any law stating they cannot be used if fit for purpose.
You may find plenty of organisations have started to veer away due to deteriorating quickly and lack of inspection regime?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alex.wilkes
Elliot have you been given specific reasons why they should not be used?
From my personnal experience wooden ladders are used but the rungs are always protected underneath with a metal rod as back up should the wooden rungs snap or damage.
Never heard of any legislation for this though.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MT
There's no law or regulation against it, that's true, however, it is advised against. I'm an LA enforcement officer, and when we received training from the HSE when the WAH Regs took effect, they advised us that we should always strongly advise businesses to dispose of wooden ladders and invest in aluminium ones instead. Wooden ones are far more likely to have faults which are less easy to pick up easily, they're often covered in paint, have rungs replaced or repaired etc, which will eventually compromise their safety.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Merchant
Sorry MT but whoever told you that was plain wrong - there is no evidence that wooden ladders are statistically any more likely to fail inspection than metal ones, and they remain in very widespread, safe, acceptable use. Yes they can suffer damage, but so can metal and GRP ladders (indeed some of the most common faults we see can _only_ occur on alloy ladders).
INDG402 doesn't even use the word "wood", and the HSE official training pack for LA inspectors ( http://www.hse.gov.uk/falls/downloads/6.pdf ) says nothing about preferring a certain material - the only place in nearly 100 pages where it mentions wood is when talking about electrical conductivity.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Flic
Dave Merchant has some good points. Wood does not normally buckle (although it can warp) and it does not suffer from fatigue failure; two very common causes of failure in metal ladders.
Flic
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TT
Methinks that the advice given would have been concerning the cheapo wooden stepladders etc. that are intended for occasional domestic use but are then taken into a commercial or even industrial environment. Often in a small business environment.
Even then though, a suitable inspection regime could be put in place to ensure regular replacement.....and so the argument goes on!
Agree with 'fit for use' comments above whether wood or aluminium.
TT
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tabs
Dave M wrote: "there is no evidence that wooden ladders are statistically any more likely to fail inspection than metal ones"
I can give you a statistic - on joining one of my posts I reviewed all ladders on site and 10 out of 10 wooden ladders were detroyed due to faults or faulty repair. 14 aluminium ladders passed inspection (and continue to do so).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Merchant
Tabs - that only shows your training and inspection systems were inadequate, not that there was anything fundamentally inferior about tree-based access equipment. Remember, wood has been around for a whole lot longer than aluminium, and we've done OK as a species despite that fact. I regularly climb hundreds of feet of wooden ladders that have been underground for a century or more, and I'm still here. There's no way I'd risk a similar vintage metal ladder without a rope and a bottle of vodka.
To me, this week, pencils are more dangerous than chainsaws - as I stabbed my finger with one, but not the other. It simply proves that you can't forget you put a chainsaw in your pocket.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rodger Alan Ker
To the best of my knowledge there is no legislation banning wooden ladders or step ladders.
We must also remember that aluminum ladders are not necessarily "safe" for all activities.
A number of construction Principal Contractors have banned aluminium equipment because of the electricution hazard.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Simon Heesom
Elliot Hi,
The banning of wooden ladders may just be corporate / client policy, as everyone else has said, nothing wrong with wooden ladders, generally.
however 'most' Water Utility companies won't allow them as wood can soak up sewage (bacteria) which is then potentially transferable to clean water sites etc (its your drinking water).
the key for control is: good policies, risk assessment, training & supervision, and compliance with the hierarchy of controls for WAH.
Cheers
Simon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Samm T
My electrians prefer to use wooden ladders for obvious reasons
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kenneth Patrick
"Wooden ones are far more likely to have faults which are less easy to pick up easily, they're often covered in paint"
Does wood attract paint more than aluminium?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TBC
Do you mean covered in paint as spillages? Painting any ladder is a No-No for obvious reasons (it hides faults).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MT
Dave, I repeat that I was given that information at an HSE training event for both HSE inspectors and LA officers. We were shown photographs of defects to look for in ladders, many of which showed wooden ladders and the type of faults which are common in them.
If you like I could look at my training notes and find out the presenter of the training course, should you wish to contact them.
I am well aware of the Topic Inspection pack, being an enforcement officer, and in fact it was discussed at the training course I mentioned.
I didn't say that wooden ladders couldn't be used. Obviously, as Samm has noted, electricians would rightly prefer wooden ladders.
Yes, TBC, I was thinking of spillages, but I've seen plenty which have been painted over completely, thus hiding faults.
Jeez, I pass on the advice given to me as an inspector, by the HSE, and then spend half an hour defending the fact that this is the information I was given by an HSE inspector. Is it any wonder people get fed up responding on this forum?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Merchant
MT - the point here is something you were told by an individual HSE inspector is markedly different to official HSE policy - they are entitled to personal viewpoints and interpretation on *some* aspects of their enforcement role, but when you read the published guidance, regulations, codes of practice and standards none of them agree with what you were told, and so he/she should never have said that in public.
Just think about the multi-million-pound cost of implementing a comment like "change all your ladders" to UK businesses - there's a very clear and intentional reason why HSE's guidance doesn't say anything of the sort, and disseminating myths is what gets our profession in so much trouble.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By A Campbell
Not that long ago I worked for a FM company where the HSE manager allowed use of aluminium ladders for electrical work... with the provision that the rubber feet were intact!
I had to privately ask the engineers to use wooden or fibreglass wherever they could.
Single HSE inspector advising.... or was that enforcing the non use of wooden ladders?
I can see headlines as when the WAH regs were being introduced ladders banned!.. 'HSE bans wooden ladders'
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MT
But Dave, I didn't say that the comment was "change all your ladders". What we were told was that going by the experiences of HSE inspectors, they have found that wooden ladders are more likely to have been neglected, badly repaired, covered in paint etc, and therefore it is often more difficult to see faults in them. Therefore they told us to recommend to businesses that they dispose of them and use metal ladders instead, where appropriate.
Here we are, I've just opened my filing cabinet, looked under the WAH section, and found the notes, which were written and presented by the HSE Safety Unit Injuries Reduction Programme Falls programme team. Perhaps if you have concerns about the advice they give to officers, you should contact them? I don't think there's much to be gained in discussing it further, as I know what I was told along with approx 100 other officers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Haynes
Dear MT,
I think that the significant shift in your postings is summed up by the use of 'where appropriate' in your final posting
Now that's something I could agree with
[mind you - define 'where appropriate']
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.