Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 June 2009 17:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hossam Hi quickly in a review process for a submitted subcontractor safety plan (Construction).. What are the really crucial and commonly over looked points that I should carefully look at before giving my feedback view on the plan? Appreciate every advice Hossam
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 June 2009 17:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie Hossam, If you are in the UK a subcontractor should not be submitting a "safety plan" that is the responsibility of the PC.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 June 2009 19:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Martyn Not quite true as the subcontractor does need to prepare a plan for his own activities in response to the CPP of the PC. Bob
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 June 2009 19:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie Bob, He has to plan his work (Risk Assessments/ Method statements/ Co-ordinates with others, etc.) but where does he have a requirement to "produce a plan"?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 June 2009 21:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By minjeeta69 If the Client / PC requests the subbie to provide a safety plan to cover its works, then the subbie should provide one. The PC develops the Construction Phase Plan, which should remain under review as the project progresses. By requesting safety plans from subbies the Client / PC is obtaining the information relevant to that subbies particular workscope. During Invitation To Tender stage, I always request Safety Plans from all tenderers; it assists with assessing the tenderers competence.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 16 June 2009 21:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie IMHO on a notifiable project there should only be ONE plan which should be produced by the Principal Contractor and followed by all other contractors on the project. The idea of each contractor producing his own plan is a recipe for disaster. The regs say contractors should "plan, manage and monitor" their works. Not produce a written H&S Plan.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 16 June 2009 22:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter The Principal Contractor is required to advise his appointments of the time available to prepare for the work. Is the time allowed reasonable, has the subbie been notified and is this acknowledged in his plan/method? Otherwise, look for competency of those who will be doing the work, adequate supervision, cooperation and coordination,suitable and sufficient risk assessment, and (where appropriate) emergency arrangements.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 16 June 2009 23:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Roarty Martyn, Thank you for your humble opinion, but that's the problem with forums/emails; individuals interpretation of what others write. I purposely called the documents by different names, i.e. Construction Phase Plan (legal requirement) and safety plan (contractual requirement on all my projects). Nowhere did I state there should be more than one plan in operation on site at any time. A couple of points to clarify: 1) The Construction Phase Plan is developed by the Principal Contractor prior to commencement of works on site. 2) The CPC should remain under constant review throughout the projects duration and should be updated as and when additional information becomes available. 3) All contractors and sub-contractors should provide information relevant to their particular workscopes to enable the Principal Contractor to update the Construction Phase Plan, as required. 4) The Construction Phase Plan developed prior to start on site will have no resemblence to the final version at completion.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 16 June 2009 23:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sharastani In reply to the initial thread, the basics would be: levels of training and experience, technical knowledge, suitable and sufficient risk assessments, method statements, works programme; and anything specific like plant certs etc. Nick you said "I purposely called the documents by different names". You must also post under different names as that was your only post:) I assume like me you post from and work and home,hence the different names.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 17 June 2009 07:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Forget CDM for the moment as the contractor noted could be a window cleaner, a caterer etc The law requires us to have a management system in place irrespective of CDM and that management system requires a plan - that plan could be the plan being asked for I ensure that all subbies, suppliers and even volunteers that work for me irrespective of the CDM regs and inclusive of them have a suitable management system in place AS for the CDM plan; nowhere does is say that a subbie need not have a management plan - I would expect the PC to be in overall charge with their plan but I would expect others to plan and manage their areas properly and the PC uses his and their plan to ensure compliance all round Additionally the client can ask for what they want inclusive of management plans
Admin  
#11 Posted : 17 June 2009 07:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis At the end of the day if the subbie has no plan for his work how is the PC going to produce an overall plan for the site? I totally agree that there is only one CPP but each employer must also plan their own work. As a PC I would not expect to define the systems of work for every contractor on site or how they manage their internal affairs, subject to adequate supervision. Bob
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.