Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 June 2009 21:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Morgan If appointed principal contractor, do I have any responsibly for activities carried out on the site prior to the date on the F10 and construction phase plan? The activities have been arranged independently by the client, and include electrical installation and gas work. The client is now asking (prompted by the cdmc) if we will control these activities. Please note these services are being installed to enable our construction to be installed, extra cables, additional gas supply etc. Thanks in advance
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 June 2009 22:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TDsafety No. Not until the F10 becomes valid. And certainly not until a programme of works is agreed. This sounds like a disaster in the making in that there is already an element of poor planning and a lack of co-operation between all parties and a reluctance to give information. Have a look at HSG 150. Have you been formerly appointed as the PC in writing yet? Are there provisions for welfare whilst this 'enabling works' is ongoing.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 June 2009 23:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter It would be prudent to steer clear of these enabling works and to confirm an on-Site start date for your works when you can assume responsibility for the start of your Construction Phase. This is not bound by date on the F10.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 June 2009 11:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis However - if the client has included these works into the tender/contract and you have provided a price on that basis then you will need to take over the management of these contractors subject the appropriate derogation clauses being in place. If the work is post contract award then it cannot be compelled but is a matter of negotiation. I cannot wholeheartedly condemn a CDMC, if it was this position, in driving such a change as there is much to commend it from a pure safety perspective. It is not that it cannot be done but that it requires addiional management and supervision. As Ron states it is a pain if taken on part complete but this can be overcome if necessary and the client is prepared to pay the costs of doing so.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.