Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 July 2009 11:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark1983 Hello there, We are about to start work as the PC for a client for a project lasting 8 weeks. We are producing a construction phase plan along with all other risk assessments but the client has expressed disinterest in appointing a CDMC. Clearly this is a legal requirement & would result in us failing to be able to display an F10. How do we pursuade the client to appoint the CDMC if he's not prepared to and how in real world terms would failure to do so affect both client and PC? I could use this info to be more persuasive. Many thanks in advance
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 July 2009 11:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Mark - have a look at this, it might help http://webcommunities.hs...wmessage?messageid=73643 Martin
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 July 2009 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS Mark Tell him that if he doesnt appoint one you will have no option but to notify the HSE so you can obtain/display an F10. Otherwise you are breaking the law yourself email me if you wish.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 July 2009 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicholas Sutcliffe Our organisation has had this situation on a few occasions, we now have a standard document that our designers hand over to all clients as soon as they are appointed, it gives a breakdown of the clients duties under CDM 2007, I'm fairly sure it ofetn does not get read but we hightlight the last 2 lines which state "Breach of the regulations is a criminal offence. The penalties for breach are: Magistrate’s Court: fine up to £5,000 Crown Court: unlimited fine." that generally gets their attention.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 July 2009 12:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft Isn't it £20,000 now?? Also remember that under CDM 2007 Reg 14 part 4a the client is deemed to be the CDMC if one is not in place at any time. Hence HSE can assume the client is the CDMC and proceed accordingly agaisnt him as client as well as as CDMC for failings. See also reg 19 that says a contractor which incls PC shall NOT proceed until CDMC name and F10 is given to him R
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 July 2009 12:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Simmons If the Client fails to appoint a CDM C then they themselves are deemed to have been appointed to the role. Regulation 14
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 July 2009 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter And in "real terms" you're prabably going to have to 'support' your Client with completion and submission of the F10...........
Admin  
#8 Posted : 06 July 2009 12:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Folks, could I clarify something please? I know about CMD stuff only from reading about them from threads like this one. Now you guys know what you are talking about so I listen. In the post I put in above, the link is to a HSE discussion forum where the message is that you do not automatically become the CDMC if you do not appoint someone else to do it as it has to be in writing. What am I missing? Martin
Admin  
#9 Posted : 06 July 2009 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark1983 Yes regulation 14 seems to be the way to go, thanks for all your helpful responses. It seems the whole 'client assumes the role of CDMC' idea is still debated by some. Its my understanding that a CDMC can only become such if appointed in writing - 14(5) Regards, Mark
Admin  
#10 Posted : 06 July 2009 13:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ciaran McAleenan Dear all Please see CDM 2007 Regulation 14 (4). Wheres the debate. It is not an assumption, rather the law deems the client to be CDMC in event... Best wishes Ciaran
Admin  
#11 Posted : 06 July 2009 15:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter martinw - it would appear that some on the HSE discussion forum are incorrectly misinterpreting Regulation 14, presuming a tautology where none exists. "Deemed to be appointed" is (IMHO) quite clear.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 06 July 2009 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw OK - fair enough. I told you I wasn't au fait with it...... Thanks for the response Martin
Admin  
#13 Posted : 06 July 2009 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simon Priest Mark, You are producing a CPP based on what? Simon
Admin  
#14 Posted : 06 July 2009 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark1983 Are CDMC's ever appointed where a project is non-notifiable? Section 4 part (a) says after the deemed bit 'SAVE PARAGRAPHS 1 and 2...' 'SAVE' means 'except for' ie/ exceptions that don't apply. To my interpretation the client only assumes the role of CDMC by default if the project is non notifiable. Later regulations for instance 18 speaks about designers not going past the initial design until a CDMC has been appointed for the project. Wouldn't that make a nonsense of it seeing as by your interpretation there would always be a CDMC because the client would have taken that role on by default? Your thougts please :)
Admin  
#15 Posted : 06 July 2009 23:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Mark, Regulations 14 - 24 are all within Part 3 of the Regulations,which is headed "ADDITIONAL DUTIES WHERE PROJECT IS NOTIFIABLE". In other respects, if the Client hasn't made appointment, then he is deemed to be the CDM-C. Regulation 14(1) & 14(2) then obviously cannot be applied - thus "save" - i.e. an exception. Simon: Based on information from the Client, Designers and perhaps others, all as provided by the Client! ;-)
Admin  
#16 Posted : 07 July 2009 08:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mal Guys, Ron is right, when a project is notifiable as per the notifiable criteria then the client takes on (legally) the role of the CDMC if they do not appoint one. No debate. If you want to confirm ring an HSE Inspector (not the info line!!). Regards, Malcolm ps: Mark, in response to your original query, contact the client, in writing or verbally, dependant upon your relationship with them, and clearly point this out.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 07 July 2009 11:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark1983 Thanks for directing my attention there Ron I think I finally understand :) Can i please just have explained to me what Paragraph 5 of reg 14 means in this context - the part about appointments being in writing. Best Regards, Mark
Admin  
#18 Posted : 07 July 2009 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter I guess this point is subject to discussion & hot debate elsewhere Mark? It all seems quite clear to me. The Client is required (by Regulation 14) to confirm his appointments in writing. (Those drafting the Regs. obviously had rules of evidence in mind here.) The law then requires a "positive action" by the Client. This extends to those Projects where he decides he has the necessary competencies to appoint himself. Evidentially then, in the absence of anything in writing,(the above "positive action" not having been taken, and thus an omission) he is deemed (key word) to have been appointed to undertake the role. This then ensures that the Enforcers always have someone to pin offences against for all the seperate Regulations.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.