Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 July 2009 12:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Bradburn My partner's child returned from a school trip yesterday extremely distressed over an incident while swimming on the east coast. While full details are unclear as yet but it appears 4 14-15 yrs olds got into difficulty, were pulled out of their depth and had to be assisted by a number of other pupils. There is also some confusion as to whether staff took the matter seriously either during or after the incident. Pupils were dimissed on return to school and no attempt was made to contact parents to explain events. (comment has been made that pupils have been told not to make a fuss so as not to jeopardise future trips. A point of note is also that the news yesterday reported an unusal tidal surge at Scarborough). At present we have been unsuccessful in contacting the school and therefore plan to do so on monday. Clearly the duty of care and need to conduct a risk assessment for this activity is in no doubt. My current view is either this has not occurred or has been inadequate. Aside from the obvious I would ask: - the competance of the person conducting the risk assessment (pupils were advised to take spare clothes as they would be allowed in the sea). - Lifesaving skills / swimming ability of staff - Control / supervision of pupils while in the water - Contingency plan in the event of someone getting into difficulty (didn't appear to work for 1, let alone 4) - Whether the event was forseeable (tidal surge notwithstanding) - Local conditions and suitability of coast (it is suggested the location has a known sudden drop off and strong currents). I really would appreciate others thoughts particularly from those involved in assessing this type of activity. While there is always a potential to over react or over embellish where children are involved the fact that all 4 pupils have had disrupted sleep, 2 vomitting and all still distressed, I believe something has gone wrong here and events could have ended very tragically. Thanks Jon
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 July 2009 13:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Jon Naturally I appreciate your evident concern about the matters you raise. In writing briefly, I recall my own disposition when I served both as a school governor, consultant safety ergonomist to a school as well as much earlier as a teacher who took a group of pupils away for a week's holiday. I also smile a little ruefully when I recall my own son's dismay with the realities of some school trips as compared to the unrealistically high expectations. While there is a possibility that a major failure in risk management occurred, the facts as you present them are that '4 pupils have had disrupted sleep, 2 vomitting and still distressed'. From your account, there is a serious absence of reliable, valid evidence about the cause of these symptoms. Assuming that you wish a constructive analysis of the quality of risk management, I simply encourage you to write to the Head of School Governors, copied to the Head Teachers, setting out relevant FACTS and asking simple questions. After all, there is no clear indication of what reports the teachers involved have made or are making to those to whocm they are directly accountable i.e. their own employers. It's in everyone's interest that very disciplined control is exercised about any expression of emotions and judgments until you have reliable valid evidence of what actually occured and of any relatinoship with the symptoms your describe. Good wishes
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 July 2009 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter48 Hi Jon, The answer is in the first instance very simple the school should have undertaken a risk assessment in line with Young persons regs and where they found a high risk should have advised parents - know turning to the school and I dont know which one or where on the 'South Coast' but if it is an LEA school they would have guidance on outwrdbound type of work. We only have to think of Lyme bay incident to send shivers up the spine..I would suggest on Monday (if you are the parent) to seek a meeting with the head and ask what happened, also for a copy of their risk asessment and what actions, including reporting of to the relevant bodies HSE/LEA etc they have done - then write to him/ her on the subject. Surley this is an accident waiting to happen and classified as a serious 'near miss' Good luck Peter
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 July 2009 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Peter/Jon What reliable, valid evidence supports Peter's allegation 'Surley (sic) this is an accident waiting to happen and classified as a serious 'near miss' It's fine to have principels and strong feelings. At the same time, with the greatest respect, such an invalid assetion illustrates how an already difficult situation can result in the school rightly refusing to comment when the very limited amount of available evidence is not very, very carefully respected. The employer and the individual teachers who took the pupils on holiday have rights, as well as responsibilities. To the extent that Jon respects their rights, he can expect a reasonable response to any expression of his concerns. To the extent that he violates the rights of the employer and individual teachers, he is unlikely to make any constructive contribution.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 July 2009 14:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC I used to live in Scarborough and would advise anyone to seek advice from the coastguard services as to where and when to allow swimming. Over the years there has been a few drownings due manly to ignorance of the undercurrents and force of the tide in many locations along this tame looking beach. Wave dodging being the worst culprit and freak waves are quite common up to 5 metres on occasions. Only after consultation with local knowledge can a full RA be completed. http://www.independent.c...and-children-528366.html
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 July 2009 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Bradburn Firstly apologies if I have been vague on some details - this is out of respect for the school involved, as I have no wish for it to be identified as I believe that would be counter-productive. Kieran - thanks for your perspective from a schools viewpoint. As I said in my original post I was looking for advice and opinions on how best to proceed. I appreciate that the available information came from pupils involved and has the potential to be only part of the story. I also appreciate that the school may not as yet had sufficient opportunity to consider exactly what has happened. What I would have expected at this stage - given the potential consequences of the incident - would be that the school had acknowledged the incident and reassured parents that it was being investigated (It is accepted practice from personal expereince that the school normally advises parents for example that their child had suffered an injury or being involved in an incident while at school). A summary of available facts at this moment would be that 4 pupils (at least one of which is a strong swimmer with personal life saving skills) entered the sea and got into diffculty, were dragged out of their depth and swamped by waves and seaweed. While not an established medical fact it is a fair assumption to make that the sleep disruption and distress is a result of the incident and that vomitting is a likely result of either ingestion of seawater or nervous tension. These are all common symptoms of nervous shock. Had it not been for the action of other pupils there is a strong possibilty that the incident could have been far worse. In that I would agree with Peter that a 'serious near miss' had indeed occurred. I would agree that the best course at this stage is to present our concerns and questions and allow the school to investigate. Could you elaborate on your suggestion to take this direct to the head of governers rather that the head of school? Thanks Jon
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 July 2009 15:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven bentham Jon Additional points: (1) what was the educational value of the trip? (2) will the Headteacher carry out a review of the incident and share results/lessons? If it had been a drowning accident the HSE & Police would carry out their own review and potentially prosecute. However, at the end of the day no one was really hurt and you should keep it in perspective. Kids have to grow up and face the dangers of a modern world. I think it is more important for parents to get sound answers to 1 & 2. If not next year parents have a choice about similar trips.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 July 2009 16:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Jon Constitutionally, the Chair of the Governors is the senior officer of a statutory school. On the basis of the information you've given, there's no valid evidence what the root cause of the symptoms you report are. It's both advisable and reasonable for the school to ask for reports from the teachers and medical staff before making any comment about the incident other than to acknowledge it along with a commitment to investigate and then take appropriate action.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 11 July 2009 17:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 May I just say, in order to avoid any confusion, that the name peter48 is not the same contributor as pete48, one of us will have to morph I guess thank you Pete48
Admin  
#10 Posted : 11 July 2009 17:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter48 FOR PETE48 - mine happens to be PETER48 - happy to change if IOSH can oblige? Thispost has certainly raised some issues!! but I am afraid the School head is the primary manager and issues need to be dealt with through him/her initially - the chair/governors later - been there done that! all have a good w/e and keep on chanting PETER48
Admin  
#11 Posted : 11 July 2009 17:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H Hi - a lot of good advice here on keeping things in perspective. Jon - you say the school has not been in contact - if your child was not directly involved in the incident, why would the school need to contact you? I would also expect the school to have facts before contacting anyone -this may explain the delay. Remember half truths are dangerous things to work with. We also need to think about how we manage this in future - you say one of the chaps was a very good swimmer with life saving skills. Ok a risk assessment should be in place, but the leaders are also on their leisure time and may not wish to go to all the effort - so - an easy way out of this in future is for the school to ban swimming - which would be very much OTT - but may come if there is a witch hunt occurred without hard facts. At the end of the day, no one was lost, so let the school do the investigation and distribute findings and learning's in a controlled, responsible manner. Dave
Admin  
#12 Posted : 11 July 2009 18:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 Jon, apologies for the minor hack of your thread. Peter 48. Thank you for your offer. Once you are logged on you can then make the change yourself by entering the "update my details" link at the top of the page. I am sure the webteam or mods will not mind the change in the circumstances. P48 Jon, as to your thread. A few questions that popped into my head. What info were parents or carers given prior to the trip. Gaining consent from parents and carers is a fundamental part of organising such trips. What questions did you or your partner ask about possible risks and safety before the trip? Were the children supposed to be in the water as part of the trip or was this an unplanned excursion or truant by the boys? I would be very surprised if a great deal of effort had not been put into the organisation, assessment of all risk etc by the school. There are strict guidelines, especially for local authority schools, that have to be followed by the school and staff managing the trip. I doubt that any school trip these days would get off the ground without suitable written risk assessments. I hope you will get answers to your questions but I would recommend, as others have said, that you try to stay as objective as possible in your discussion with the school. After all even with the best planning, accidents can and do still happen and to assume that automatically means the school is somehow totally and solely to blame is dubious. You may find the following link useful for a bit of research. http://www.teachernet.go.../healthandsafety/visits/
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 July 2009 19:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Bradburn Pete48, Thanks, the link has been quite enlightening! I've got more than enough to enable a constructive dialogue with the school. Though its a bit off topic from my original post, I disagree with comments about keeping matters in perspective - to say no-one was hurt is incorrect in that 4 girls (not boys!)have been harmed ('harm' not being confined to physical injury but also mental (shock) which may manifest physical symptoms). As is commonly the case, tradgedies such as Lyme Bay (and indeed many workplace incidents) generally occur because near misses have been ignored or ineffectively investigated. The swimming activity was a planned part of a science field trip (the appropriateness may well be a matter of debate). I personally do not object to this (assuming proper planning has occurred). It is unfortunate that lessons learn't may well be that its not worth it and 'elf n safety' bans another school trip, so adding to the lunacy we see today. I'm an avid canoeist and fell walker amongst other 'adventure sports' and as such encourage our kids to push the envelope and experience life. What saddens me most is 'don't rock the boat or the kids will suffer' At the end of the day IF something has gone wrong its better to put it right now that endure another tradic headline
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 July 2009 19:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H Jon - you said "to say no-one was hurt is incorrect in that 4 girls (not boys!)have been harmed ('harm' not being confined to physical injury but also mental (shock) which may manifest physical symptoms)" Sorry but no one was directly hurt by this incident - these emotional outcomes may have occurred if they had witnessed an RTA on the way back. You also said " As is commonly the case, tragedies such as Lyme Bay (and indeed many workplace incidents) generally occur because near misses have been ignored or ineffectively investigated" You have no evidence that this is being ignored or ineffectively investigated.And this is no Lyme Bay incident - so keep it in perspective. I wish you luck in your search but again - look at the facts that you have here - it is very easy to feel worried and want to do something to stop it happening again, but I think my message is keep it controlled. Dave
Admin  
#15 Posted : 11 July 2009 20:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By H.S.E.people [reference removed] is a new website designed exclusively for people working or recruiting in the area of Health and Safety. The site is 100% Free to join and offers members the ability to exchange information and network in a way that has not been possible until now. [reference removed] combines the best features of Social Networking, Job Sites and Training resources all in one place. Members can build a profile advertising their availability, services they offer and any company information they wish including contact details and web links. Other members can browse profiles and search using key words or location. It is easy to send a message to a member’s inbox or to leave a comment on their profile. Members can upload pictures, safety videos or even music to their profile and can easily add other friends also on the site. It is easy to view who is online and rather than send a message or email, members can chat quickly through the sites instant messenger or using the sites forums where discussions can range from requests for information, exchanging general chit chat or talking about job leads. The forums offer freedom of speech and are not over moderated like other forums on the Net. One of the main features of [reference removed] is the free jobs pages and RSS Jobs Feeds. The first allows any Recruiters / Companies on the site to list HSE Positions on the forums for FREE. The jobs pages are proving very popular with already over fifty agencies posting jobs in the first six weeks and many success stories starting to emerge of successfully placed candidates. The second is the RSS job feeds which are pulling jobs in from lots of other job sites all over the Web. These are broken down into categories and update as soon as jobs are listed on the relevant sites. This means that we are very confident you can find more HSE jobs on [reference removed] than any other site on the Net! The best part is it’s FREE to list, browse, search and apply for Jobs. More ways of exchanging information is also available to any member on the site. Any member can create a blog to their own profile. If the content is relevant to other [reference removed] then that blog can be posted to the site magazine with moderator approval. Everything can be done from the control panel at the left hand side on every main page on the site. [reference removed] is a community site and in looking for ways to fund the site, keeping the content relevant to Health and Safety and not plastering the site in banner advertising we have came up with a few ideas that may work well with your business. Firstly, the Events page, this page allows Trainers or Course providers to upload details on training events they are holding in the near future. Members of the site can then enlist for the event. [reference removed] will only charge 10% of the course cost per delegate signing up through the site. It is free to upload an event so you have nothing to lose by giving it a go. Secondly, is the addition of a links page that will be coming very soon. This page will be broken down into three categories: Recruiters, Trainers & Consultants. Here you can place a link on a main page of [reference removed] and advertise your business to our members. As the site is new we are offering the first 25 links for only £150. If you would like to show your support for [reference removed] and promote your business to our ever growing number of members please contact Kevin@hsepeople.com Thirdly, we will in the future be offering a product review page. This will be a great way of getting your product out into the market and visible to our members. We particularly want to hear from PPE Companies or Safety Equipment manufacturers who would like us to review their products. This service may eventually expand to course providers. Lastly, [reference removed] is hoping to soon be able to offer a Document Library that any member will be able to add documents too. Other members will then be able to browse, search and then download any document they need. We think this will prove to be a very valuable and popular page. How many times have you been required to write a new procedure or produce a risk assessment or training presentation on a subject that you know other [reference removed] have probably covered thousands of times? No longer will you need to reinvent the wheel… Power points, Presentations, Forums, Posters, Regulations, Procedures, Formats and much more will all be able to be uploaded. This page is proving expensive to make and it would be great to hear from companies interested in sponsoring it. We are sure it will be the most popular page on the site and we could offer your company some fantastic exposure. [reference removed] is only six weeks old but already proving hugely popular with almost 1000 members, the site has so far grown mostly on word of mouth. Only now are we starting to appear in search results and directories. I think this demonstrates how much of a hit the site is. We hope [reference removed] becomes the one place recruiters go when looking for candidates, Candidates when looking for jobs, Companies when looking for Consultants and [reference removed] when looking for information or training courses. The site is currently receiving over 2500 hits a week and that is increasing with every new member that signs up. We are working hard to appear at the top of Search Engine Results and even though it takes time and a lot of effort we are committed to making [reference removed] a Success. I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to create a profile on [reference removed], Advertise your company or business and have a feel round see what you think. If you see the potential in the site and wish to support it by any of the above mentioned methods then please do drop us a line. Your support will make the site a success and hopefully the one stop shop for everything HSE. Hope to see you there. Kevin Forbes www.hsepeople.com
Admin  
#16 Posted : 11 July 2009 20:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By www.hsepeople.com [reference removed] is a new website designed exclusively for people working or recruiting in the area of Health and Safety. The site is 100% Free to join and offers members the ability to exchange information and network in a way that has not been possible until now. [reference removed] combines the best features of Social Networking, Job Sites and Training resources all in one place. Members can build a profile advertising their availability, services they offer and any company information they wish including contact details and web links. Other members can browse profiles and search using key words or location. It is easy to send a message to a member’s inbox or to leave a comment on their profile. Members can upload pictures, safety videos or even music to their profile and can easily add other friends also on the site. It is easy to view who is online and rather than send a message or email, members can chat quickly through the sites instant messenger or using the sites forums where discussions can range from requests for information, exchanging general chit chat or talking about job leads. The forums offer freedom of speech and are not over moderated like other forums on the Net. One of the main features of [reference removed] is the free jobs pages and RSS Jobs Feeds. The first allows any Recruiters / Companies on the site to list HSE Positions on the forums for FREE. The jobs pages are proving very popular with already over fifty agencies posting jobs in the first six weeks and many success stories starting to emerge of successfully placed candidates. The second is the RSS job feeds which are pulling jobs in from lots of other job sites all over the Web. These are broken down into categories and update as soon as jobs are listed on the relevant sites. This means that we are very confident you can find more HSE jobs on [reference removed] than any other site on the Net! The best part is it’s FREE to list, browse, search and apply for Jobs. More ways of exchanging information is also available to any member on the site. Any member can create a blog to their own profile. If the content is relevant to other [reference removed] then that blog can be posted to the site magazine with moderator approval. Everything can be done from the control panel at the left hand side on every main page on the site. [reference removed] is a community site and in looking for ways to fund the site, keeping the content relevant to Health and Safety and not plastering the site in banner advertising we have came up with a few ideas that may work well with your business. Firstly, the Events page, this page allows Trainers or Course providers to upload details on training events they are holding in the near future. Members of the site can then enlist for the event. [reference removed] will only charge 10% of the course cost per delegate signing up through the site. It is free to upload an event so you have nothing to lose by giving it a go. Secondly, is the addition of a links page that will be coming very soon. This page will be broken down into three categories: Recruiters, Trainers & Consultants. Here you can place a link on a main page of [reference removed] and advertise your business to our members. As the site is new we are offering the first 25 links for only £150. If you would like to show your support for [reference removed] and promote your business to our ever growing number of members please contact Kevin@hsepeople.com Thirdly, we will in the future be offering a product review page. This will be a great way of getting your product out into the market and visible to our members. We particularly want to hear from PPE Companies or Safety Equipment manufacturers who would like us to review their products. This service may eventually expand to course providers. Lastly, [reference removed] is hoping to soon be able to offer a Document Library that any member will be able to add documents too. Other members will then be able to browse, search and then download any document they need. We think this will prove to be a very valuable and popular page. How many times have you been required to write a new procedure or produce a risk assessment or training presentation on a subject that you know other [reference removed] have probably covered thousands of times? No longer will you need to reinvent the wheel… Power points, Presentations, Forums, Posters, Regulations, Procedures, Formats and much more will all be able to be uploaded. This page is proving expensive to make and it would be great to hear from companies interested in sponsoring it. We are sure it will be the most popular page on the site and we could offer your company some fantastic exposure. [reference removed] is only six weeks old but already proving hugely popular with almost 1000 members, the site has so far grown mostly on word of mouth. Only now are we starting to appear in search results and directories. I think this demonstrates how much of a hit the site is. We hope [reference removed] becomes the one place recruiters go when looking for candidates, Candidates when looking for jobs, Companies when looking for Consultants and [reference removed] when looking for information or training courses. The site is currently receiving over 2500 hits a week and that is increasing with every new member that signs up. We are working hard to appear at the top of Search Engine Results and even though it takes time and a lot of effort we are committed to making [reference removed] a Success. I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to create a profile on [reference removed], Advertise your company or business and have a feel round see what you think. If you see the potential in the site and wish to support it by any of the above mentioned methods then please do drop us a line. Your support will make the site a success and hopefully the one stop shop for everything HSE. Hope to see you there. Kevin Forbes www.hsepeople.com
Admin  
#17 Posted : 13 July 2009 01:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough Jon As an adviser to a local authority dealing mainly with its schools, including off-site and adventurous activities, I would echo the earlier responses and suggest that you contact the headteacher to tell him/her what you have heard and ask 1) if the sea swimming was a planned activity and 2) what risk assessments were made for the activity, bearing in mind that water has been the common denominator in a number of highly publicised tragedies involving young people engaged in outdoor activities in, on or near water. However, as you say, if there were shortcomings which led to the 4 pupils getting into difficulties then hopefully these will be identified and used constructively for planning and running future trips rather than as an excuse to ban them. Also, as Pete48 has commented, even with good planning and supervision, things can still go wrong sometimes - that's a fact of life. By all means copy in the school's chair of governors. However, he/she will almost certainly contact the headteacher (effectively the school's "chief executive") for information if not already aware of something apparently having gone amiss during the trip. It is quite likely the case that the headteacher and the school's educational visits co-ordinator (EVC) already know of the alleged incident and that the teachers who ran the trip have spent time compiling a report since returning. They would probably anticipate that pupils on the trip would probably tell their parents, as your partner's child has done. Also, as some pupils and parents might decide to tell the media, the school should be prepared for the possibility of queries from journalists. Thus, it could be that the school will shortly provide for parents of pupils who went on the trip at least an interim report about the circumstances. If the school is part of a local authority, it will probably be notifying and getting comments from the authority's outdoor activity adviser and/or health & safety adviser. The same goes for telling the council's public relations people so that they can deal with any media enquiries which arise. In due course would you consider briefly summarising the outcome of this matter for the benefit of forum users who are parents of school pupils or are otherwise involved with school trips? However, if this could compromise the anonymity of the school and any local authority, forum users should respect you for declining the request.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 13 July 2009 07:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F. Agreed that the school should be approached, but didn't you say an unusual tidal effect, so how would they know? You can risk assess until the cows come home but if it's not foreseeable then you can't but any control measures in place. Why does it have to have educational value, maybe some of the school have never had an holiday, so that was the value. As said it is worth raising with the school, because it has been known for kids to exaggerate.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 13 July 2009 15:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Peter as I said in my earlier posting the 'unusual' tide effect is not so unusual in many parts of Scarborough and local knowledge is extremely valuable in the RA process.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 13 July 2009 16:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Bradburn Graham, Thanks for the constructive advice which was all in line with my initial thoughts and earlier advice. It's early days yet but after emailing the school we have been contacted and advised that the the matter is being taken very seriously - including that fact that the incident has not been reported by staff. We were thanked for the information provided and the constructive manner in which it was presented. It would also appear that there have been enquiries from parents of pupils not directly affected by the event. Peter - Is it forseeable that the sea can be very unpredictable? - Yes Can you determine specific risks of particular locations? - Often Is it forseeable that a child can get into diffculty? - Yes With that in mind what options are there? 1. Cancel the activity? - yes but is that fair / necessary? 2. Move the activity to a better location (designted swimming beach 3 miles away with lifeboat and possibly lifeguards) 3. Ensure staff are qualified in lifesaving? - possibly. 4. Provide safety equiment and train staff in use. What I am trying to get across here is that these activities don't have to suffer because of 'elf n safety'. Exposure to risk can be fun but should not be excessive and should an accident lets be prepared. I think control was lost but can only await the outcome of the school report, I will update you as Graham suggested (anonimity permitting) Thanks again Jon
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.