Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 July 2009 08:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson Hi All. I've searched the forums and found various standards relating to fall prevention and arrest systems, but I'm still struggling a bit. BS 8437 seems to give the clearest guidance but it's still not quite specific enough for me, and I know there are some specialists in work at height on this forum who might help me with more specific answers to 2 questions. First, if you have fixed eyebolts or a cable system for attaching harnesses on a roof, how often should it have a thorough examination? BS 8437 says every 6 months. INDG 422 says 6 months for lifting equipment for lifting people. But most people I've asked say it's normally annual. Assuming this equipment is not used very often, what would people here say? The other question is training. Is there a standard course that's normally accepted? Or is it acceptable for a simple in-house briefing to be given? And how often? BS 8437 calls for a formal training with refreshers but the age-old question is how often to refresh, because external training is expensive? What's the norm out there? Do people normally expect an annual formal training or is informal training common? These cable and eyebolt solutions are in use alot and the training and inspection requirements are costly. I'd like to understand the requirements and the costs to maybe justify other solutions. I'd be grateful for any pointers.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Luke. Firstly Neil.. Not teaching you to suck eggs, but have you exhausted all options to ensure that harnesses are the best option? (they are WAY down the list in terms of fall prevention in the HSE view)... 1. Inspections Where appropriate, fall arrest equipment(including accessories) should be thoroughly examined before it is used for the first time and at least six-monthly or at intervals laid down in an examination schedule set by a competent person. All examination work should be performed by a competent person; and following a thorough inspection, a report is submitted by the competent person to the employer to take the appropriate action. British Standard, BS 8437:2005 provides detailed guidance on the selection, use and maintenance of personal fall arrest equipment 2. Training Yes yes yes.. get formal training! You need to prove competence and provide adequate training. Companies tend not to specify a specific course that needs to be carried out as long as its a formal course carried out by a COMPETENT person. Hope that helps a bit.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Luke. Firstly Neil.. Not teaching you to suck eggs, but have you exhausted all options to ensure that harnesses are the best option? (they are WAY down the list in terms of fall prevention in the HSE view)... 1. Inspections Where appropriate, fall arrest equipment(including accessories) should be thoroughly examined before it is used for the first time and at least six-monthly or at intervals laid down in an examination schedule set by a competent person. All examination work should be performed by a competent person; and following a thorough inspection, a report is submitted by the competent person to the employer to take the appropriate action. British Standard, BS 8437:2005 provides detailed guidance on the selection, use and maintenance of personal fall arrest equipment 2. Training Yes yes yes.. get formal training! You need to prove competence and provide adequate training. Companies tend not to specify a specific course that needs to be carried out as long as its a formal course carried out by a COMPETENT person. Hope that helps a bit.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant 8437 is what it is - a useful doorstop. If the anchor points are used for fall arrest or restraint, then LOLER does not apply and inspections are required 'at least annually', courtesy of PUWER.6 and BSEN365. That is by far the most common interval seen in practice, though the guy doing the inspections will of course always advise shorter intervals as he's looking for work. If the anchors are used for suspension (rope access, work positioning) then LOLER applies and requires 6-monthly thorough examinations or a WSE scheme. Shorter intervals are sensible for harsh use or aggressive environments, but there's no other reason to vary from the above. As to training - typical "roof worker" courses last one day, certify for two years, and lead to a half-day refresher. They need to expire because equipment standards and product designs change that fast. An in-house chat is totally unacceptable, though there's no nationally-set standard course syllabus.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 July 2009 10:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Luke. Also remember that any safety harness system is ultimately only as effective as the security of the anchor point. Anchor points should be regularly tested. Visual check is not sufficient Courtesy of the HSE. http://webcommunities.hs...ight/view?objectId=14419
Admin  
#6 Posted : 15 July 2009 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson Thank you very much Dave and Luke for your responses. Dave I will follow your advice regarding the training. First I take your points about these systems not being very high up the hierarchy of control. I'd like to understand the costs so I can make a financial case as well as a safety case! I notice you disagreed regarding whether thorough inspection should be every 6 or 12 months. BS 8437 calls for 6 monthly inspections - does this not apply Dave? I'd like to be able to give an answer and point to an authoritative source lke a BS if poss. But if 12 monthly is really the norm then that's that.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 16 July 2009 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant What I said in my reply is what you'll see across 90% of the UK sector - BS8437 says 6 months because (and I'm saying this carefully) it took advice from certain interested parties. The only anchors that I see with a 6-month ticket are those used for suspension or rescue (under LOLER) or where the environment is very corrosive (offshore, chemical plants, etc.) so there's a particular need to check more frequently. Apart from corrosion or collapse of the building it's fitted to, a roof anchor in the UK is basically just going to sit there between uses and won't be damaged by use (as is a harness or rope) so the "wear and tear" argument really doesn't figure.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 16 July 2009 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Hi Neil What Dave said!!! Unless a "Standard" is actually called up by a piece of legislation [normally via the ACoP in the UK] it is nothing more than good practice - & sometimes not even that unforunately. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#9 Posted : 17 July 2009 00:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andymak Hi Neil, Try this from the Work at Height Safety Association. http://www.wahsa.co.uk/c...ownload/gid,10/Itemid,8/ They provide advice and guidance to manufacturers, installers and users of work at height and fall arrest equipment.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 17 July 2009 10:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson Sounds like good clear advice to me - thanks very much everyone, and a useful link there to WAHSA for the future. If only I'd known that was there I could've avoided taking up space on this forum! Thanks again everyone.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.