Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 July 2009 18:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Putman Hello All, I wondered if anyone is aware of where I can find a good discussion concerning the above incident online (as I'm sure there have been many). I wondered if people would be prepared to offer there views concerning the fire safety measures which should be installed within such blocks, i.e. older high rise blocks served by a single common stair. I am of the opinion that a communal fire alarm system would not be practical, and may actually result in the fire and resuce service being obstructed when attempting to resuce people. I am more in favour of recommending sprinkler systems covering the common areas, however I expect that it will be difficult to convince local authorities to include such measures within their budgets and may be subject to abuse. I would also be interested to hear opinions on the use of plastic window frames (which were recently installed in the building) and how significant they affected the rate of fire spread? Which materials would you suggest that these are replaced with? Any input would be appreciated. Many Thanks, James Putman
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 July 2009 18:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw John good talking points but more info needed, certainly in terms of the systems in place at the time - were there any, and if so did they work, or was there nothing in place - and the nature of the materials used within the plastic doors. Was the fire escape route protected? Were there fire doors and if so were they in good order? Was any previous fire risk assessment carried out, and if so when and was it followed? Loads more info needed before advice is able to be usefully provided in this specific case, other than generalisms. Any idea how the LFB invetigation is going? I saw some gumf on the Directgov site but nothing informative. Any info anyone else?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 July 2009 18:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Skyrme James, Fire is not really an area of my speciality, but a few things sprung immediately to mind from an outsiders point of view. Also I am not familiar with the incident you mention. I like sprinklers, used to get a lot of overtime maintaining them years ago! Yes they are subject to vandalism and abuse, but you can get air filled types like a Fire Brigade dry riser. Window frames, aluminium does not burn. Flame retardant and low smoke and fume polymers (LSF) as per electrical cables are available. Surely compartmentalisation as in fire doors would be a good idea? Structural integrity of the building has to be maintained, was this compromised by low cost repairs or modifications? Refuges? Possibly again likely to be vandalised or become used for unsavoury acts? Fire alarms are useful, but, even the best are prone to false alarms faults and vandalism. Keeps Engineers, technicians and trades people in work! Perhaps advising people what to do could help? I don't know how the incident started. Could that have been avoided, was it due to unauthorised (read unsafe) electrical modifications, or those to a gas system, was it arson? Could CCTV have helped? There that is probably enough from me as you are almost certainly thinking that this is rubbish, but I hope this helps?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 July 2009 20:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Paul - for info. I am not a class warrior but from a quick search this is a reasonably informative and also opinionated view of the fire and its effects. I do not nor have i ever supported the socialist worker, but of the pieces I found, this gave details. London Fire Brigade are investigating. This may have real impact on how FRA's are done in the future in this area. I for one will be waiting to see how my job will be changed. cheers Martin
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 July 2009 20:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Oops http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=18421 sorry Paul Martin
Admin  
#6 Posted : 15 July 2009 21:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Skyrme Martin, I think that my comments are not far off this article? However, no political debate will be entertained from now on. Just to say that the loss of life is unforgivable if it could have been avoided by practicable solutions. Paul
Admin  
#7 Posted : 15 July 2009 23:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw Do not expect any results from the investigation to be published before next year. With an inquest and no doubt several legal battles ahead, it's unlikely that the fire brigade will produce more than a summary of findings before next spring. In any case, they are always careful not to upset the Coroner whose job it is to find the causes of death. In the meanwhile lessons that could be learned will have to wait. Not even a public inquiry would speed things up, in fact it may actually slow the process down - although perhaps one is required bearing in mind the tens of thousands of people that live in these blocks and rely on systems that might prove not to have worked. With the Bloody Sunday Inquiry still dragging on 11 years after it started and at a cost of £400 million(!!). So you can see why such inquiries are no unpopular with the Govt. So I reckon there's little chance of the whole picture (including building regs, the RRO and fire service procedures)ever being considered by one agency and coming out in one document.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 16 July 2009 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Paul sorry, I was not criticising or trying to correct. I just put the info about the fire into the thread because you said that you were not fully au fait with it, that was all. Honest!
Admin  
#9 Posted : 17 July 2009 13:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh Hi James, would suggest you await the outcome of the investigation that's underway.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.