Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tumbleweed
Hi,
Does anyone currently carry out drug testing for their delivery drivers and can recommend a company? I'm only in the initial stages of searching for companies to carry out testing for our in-house delivery fleet drivers, but if anyone can advise on the type of things I should be looking out for that would be great! ie frequency of testing, on-site/off-site testing, scheduled/unannounced/random and what has worked best for your drivers/company.
Thanks
Tumbleweed
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TonyB
Hi Tumbleweed,
I think one of the areas you are going to have to look at is what your going to do if a driver refuses to submit to testing.
I think I'm right in saying (and I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong) that you cannot force people to submit to testing, as it is classified as intermate. However, if their employment contract clearly state that refusal constitutes 'gross misconduct' you can take action against them for refusal. If it doesn't you can't.
Some people believe that Section 7 of HSWA means that employees have to summit to the test, as refusal can be seen as a failure to co-operate with their employee with regards to health and safety. But S7 is qualified by the statement of a duty 'imposed' on the employer. This type of testing IMPO is not 'imposed' on employers but selected. If this is the case then failure to submit is not a breach of S7, and again the employer cannot take any action (unless its in the Contract of Employment).
You can however, after consultation amend peoples contracts of employment to include this requirement but only with the individuals consent and signature. Again, if they refuse to amend their contracts your stuck!
All the best,
TonyB
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andymak
Why stop at drivers? why stop at drugs? Easier to implement if it is a company wide scheme, DNA 'Drugs n Alcohol' testing is common in the construction, rail, and transport sectors.
Generally as previously said refusal is taken as a misconduct, when it is written into the contract of employment.
My last employer worked on the assumption that a refusal was akin to a positive test.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dtec
Morning Tumbleweed,
I look after UK sales for a specialist supplier of drug / alcohol screening devices and provide consultancy when implementing this type of policy. Our drug screening product is entirely non invasive to the employee (unlike urine screening) and displays a positive / negative result within ten minutes. Our DrugWipes are being used worldwide by roadside police for driver drug screening. We also supply heavily to the UK workplace market throughout many industries including bus / coach, construction and large fleet operators. If you would like me to contact you to discuss further and provide more info, let me know.
Thanks,
Gareth
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Worth
That post made me curious and I'm just asking as an aside, do you not get a large amount of false positives with drug wipes?
I can imagine hundreds of possibilities where I could give a legal false positive.
I appreciate this also applies to urine screening tho.
This is OK for your own workforce where more detailed analysis can be carried out but as a screen for contractors might it be difficult to control?
Didn't mean to hijack the thread, just curious.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AHS
DNA testing thats taking it to a whole new level I say lets start with those in charge.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SteveD-M
I used this company for the initial training and testing on a 'for cause' basis.
http://www.grendonstar.co.uk/
It can be done quite easily...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob35
We currently undertake random D&A testing for employees including drivers.
The company we use is Drager who have developed a computerised drug screening kit which we purchased.
If you would like to discuss further then do not hesitate to drop me a e-mail
Regards
Rob35
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gareth Salisbury
Sorry for the delay in replying, busy times at present.
Regarding false positives, in very, very rare occasions DrugWipe has experienced a false positive from screening with DrugWipe to urine confirmation because DrugWipe has lower cut off levels than the cut off levels used in laboratory confirmation testing by GCMS. We will initially correctly detect a drug but when the secondary confirmation is taken, even though the drug is still present, it is below workplace cut off levels. Therefore the test has to be declared negative.
In 10 years of supplying DrugWipe for sweat testing, codeine is the only prescription drug that has achieved a positive for our opiates test (codeine and morphine are forms of opiate aswell as heroin). The individual would have had to used an extremely large amount to trigger a positive (codeine is an addictive yet legal painkiller in the UK, and is featured in Coronation Street at the moment!!).This is extremely rare and when the secondary confirmation test goes back to the lab for GCMS analysis, the true metabolite of the drug will be identified so an innocent person will ultimately not be disciplined unfairly.
I would be happy to provide further information if required, the above is just a very brief and hopefully understandable explanation.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.