Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 August 2009 17:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By bluesail461 Need advice please, I am working on a project that has been completed for some time and client is using the building, a sports hall. A problem has arisen however, an individual sustained an injury in the sports hall and the stretcher trolley which was used to collect him was unable to go in the lift, (lift needed as the building is set on a slope and the sports hall is at a lower level) therefore access was gained using the emergency exit doors around the outside of the building. Is there a spec for the access to/ from such exits from the outside as when the trolley was wheeled over the gravel path, it sank into the gravel and was unable to be moved with the patient on it. Do MoE HAVE to be suitable for wheeled gurneys or stretchers from emergency exits? My view would be yes, as it would also be a requirement under DDA for wheelchair users but can anyone tell me where I can get a definitive answer? Reason being that theres a bit of a bunfight between the builder, architect and others about who or what should be required - fun to watch but I am trying not to become part of it!! Thanks everyone cheers jez
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 August 2009 20:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Sorry to disillusion you bluesail, but from your posting the various parties should get at least one independant view each that they could then fight over in court - 'cos that's almost certainly where it's going. Someone is going to have to spring for some serious loot here! Frank Hallett
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 August 2009 15:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Della Pearlman If you take a look at BS 8300: 2009 on disabled access, it says “An access route should have a firm, slip-resistant and reasonably smooth surface. Cobbles, bare earth, sand and unbonded gravel should not be used.” BS 9999 on fire safety, in clause 46 on evacuation of disabled people, says of mobility impaired people that it might be necessary to include making all escape routes accessible.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 August 2009 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Della Pearlman I have also had a look at Part M of the Building Regs - which states that “all access routes to principal or alternative accessible entrances should be surfaced so that people are able to travel along them easily without excessive effort and without the risk of tripping or falling.” Elsewhere it states that gravel might be an inappropriate material. It may therefore come down to an interpretation of whether the emergency exit route was an access route - as I would assume that the access routes to the usual entrances were disabled friendly.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.