Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 August 2009 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Toys in surgery waiting rooms have been banned as they can pose health risks….. http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/70131
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 August 2009 12:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne I'd swear that in addition to providing material to inspire debate, you are also trying to wind certain members up...if I didn't know better that is. :)
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 August 2009 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw And of course there is the infection control risk.....
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Mark, Some of these articles wind me up, so I pass on some of my frustration on your side.... A problem shared is a problem halved. Thanks for sharing your opinion...
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By S W I don't want half your problems though!! ;-)
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer Sounds like someone is on a record posting mission. regards Ted
Admin  
#7 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Swis, does your employer know how much time you spend on this forum? Is it a good idea having already had a pay cut? Hint hint ;-)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F. Swis, I understand that you bring these articles to our attention for discussion or awareness, but you never comment on them in any way. It appears now that the articles are not debated only your posting of them.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Petrie Look guys, the title of this post on the main page clearly has 'Swis' next to it, if you don't want to read his posts, then don't read them. Please leave the message boards for people who want to read the message and discuss it, not for slagging of the person who posted it.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 05 August 2009 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F. 6 out of 7 and counting
Admin  
#11 Posted : 05 August 2009 14:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Peter, "Swis I understand that you bring these articles to our attention for discussion or awareness, but you never comment on them in any way. It appears now that the articles are not debated only your posting of them.” I have (already) responded to this question in the other thread and you have already read it. But for your information, I post it again; I do express my opinion sometimes when there’s a conflicting debate. (what’s the point in debating something which is already mutually agreed).……Please see below a couple of links in this matter… (can dig more if required ;-)) http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=45663 http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...um=1&thread=46324&page=1
Admin  
#12 Posted : 05 August 2009 14:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw I see both sides to this. Swis, your posts regarding silly bans on H&S issues are becoming like watching reruns on Dave. However, they do get us gassing. Peter - just because someone is not agreeing with you does not make them wrong. Surprised at your attitude. Martin
Admin  
#13 Posted : 05 August 2009 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis “does your employer know how much time you spend on this forum? Is it a good idea having already had a pay cut? Hint hint ;-)” LOL, Just discussed this with my boss (who also browse through this forum now and again). According to him, having good safety culture and reduced accidents along with spending a lot of time browsing through the safety forums is acceptable in comparison to not surfing the net at all but having a drastic workplace with loads of press coverage. He says that my job will be at risk if my actions resulted in any media story.. (not for the story but due to wrong use of time…) (by the way, my boss is not a health and safety professional)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 05 August 2009 14:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw I suggest that if your boss was a H&S professional then you would not be there as you would not be needed. Didn't really need to point that out. But come on Swis take a joke. Only 90% to go. When your salary stops going down you will really find out how much your boss thinks of you. :-}
Admin  
#15 Posted : 05 August 2009 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F. Just a point I didn't say Swis was wrong for posting, if that how Swis wants to use the threads that's fine all I asked was could she put that it is a newspaper thread. I wouldn't like to miss something that could improve health and safety were I work just because I thought that Swis had just posted a mews paper article. As I said earlier I believe that Swis has made some very valuble contributions and posted some thought provoking threads.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 05 August 2009 15:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still To get back to the subject of the article, some time ago I was going to buy a similar doll at a craft fair, for a new grandchild. I asked the knitter what the filling material was, and she told me that she used to use sawdust, but it leaks out of the knitted dolls so now she only used sawdust for fabric dolls. For the knitted ones she used some left-over fibreglass loft insulation! I guess her customers were lucky she didn't have any asbestos... I've also seen similar toys sold as "for ornamental purposes" to try to evade the Toy Safety regulations. Peter
Admin  
#17 Posted : 05 August 2009 16:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Sorry, wrong thread! Peter
Admin  
#18 Posted : 05 August 2009 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs One person was "shocked". One person was "confused". Very odd feelings to have about the absence of toys. The control measure of regularly cleaning toys is a distraction of money away from the provision of medical care. As one commentator writes, perhaps the parents should be prepared and take something with the child?
Admin  
#19 Posted : 05 August 2009 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 I can't believe I've just spent time reading this rubbish, and then responded! What has it got to do with H&S?
Admin  
#20 Posted : 05 August 2009 16:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose Groan! I am beginning to despair.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 05 August 2009 17:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough GeoffB4 asks what connection this topic has with H&S. One answer is that the heading of the press article is "Health and Safety Zealots ban toys in surgeries". It's a typically journalistic attention grabbing/indignation rousing heading. The article explains that one NHS trust relayed national NHS advice to practices in its area to remove toys from waiting rooms as an infection control measure. It also mentioned that the trust might emulate neighbouring trusts with practices which have washable toys. Another answer is that at each practice where washable toys are provided, one or more people are landed with the task of regularly washing said toys, whether it be a member of practice staff, a volunteer helper (I think my local practice has a "Friends of..type support group) or perhaps a contractor. Staff in most if not all practices are already busy people. Therefore, if staff are required to clean toys is there not a likelihood that the cleaning might not get done at the requisite intervals! From this arises the question of how often such toys should be washed, bearing in mind that a toy handled by/sneezed over by just one infected child will probably render it contaminated and a source of infection for others. It's interesting to read some of the comments beneath the web article. Some people express shock at the removal of the toys while others approve of it as a sensible health measure. One wonders how many parents who expect toys to be provided in a practice waiting room would not hesitate to sue the practice or local NHS trust if they thought that any of their children had contracted an illness via such a toy and/or disputed the frequency of its cleaning!
Admin  
#22 Posted : 05 August 2009 19:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Blenkharn As an IPS and HIS member, I'm aware that in response to particular problems, and latterly in response to specific DoH guidelines, most soft toys have been removed from all healthcare premises, though for inpatients parents are obviously allowed to bring in a reasonable number of toys for their child only. Problem is they get filthy, and of course passed around between patients, having been drooled on, chewed on and vomited on, as a potential vector of infection. They are very difficult to clean and sanitise effectively. To treat them effectively there would need to be a vast number so that they can be taken away and processed between use. Cost and practicality is an issue, but there is evidence of a heavy microbial burden and evidence to support a probable link to infection. Other practical problems exist, in that most toys are not made to withstand the rigours of the necessary cleaning process. Nobody wants their kids placed at additional risks from damaged or dirty and contaminated toys when in hospital, or in the GP surgery. It may seem a heartless policy, but is predicated on robust evidence and of course does not prevent parents bring in their own toys to comfort children when admitted to hospital.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 05 August 2009 21:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw You think that that is heartless. In lots of wards now, you cannot take flowers in to those who you are visiting due to the nature of what the persons in the ward are in for. Why? Flowers gather dust and get dirty. The contract cleaners cannot clean them - they do not have the equipment etc. This is indeed about health and safety one way or another. It involves the health and the safety of those who can be protected by taking positive action, and inaction will cause illness. So those who say that you are despairing, stop. Sometimes worthwhile can come out of dross tabloid reporting, such as this thread, which I am still enjoying.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 05 August 2009 21:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Blenkharn Martinw Do try not take the same silly line as might be expected of the tabloid press. Flowers are really quite a problem. Several outbreaks of infection have been proven to be associated with bugs growing in vases of water. Add to that the practical problems of spillages etc, nursing time, the practicalities of providing vases etc, and disposal, and its quite a sensible decision to say no. Unless, of course, you are prepared to pay more in tax and fund additional staff resource in the Health Service though that alone will not address the infection risk. You seem quick to judge on issues that you presumably have no real knowledge of, but I doubt you would be so insistent if it meant that you were to face an increase in tax, or a septic death traced back to contaminated water in flower vases.
Admin  
#25 Posted : 06 August 2009 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Personally my Noise Assessment shows these toys ought to be banned - it might be a more comfortable experience waiting for the doctor!! If they want toys then there should be a separate play room. I walk with crutches and it is an absolute nightmare trying to get to a seat with a toy strewn floor and kids running round being ploice sirens or fire engines. Bob retiring to a safe distance
Admin  
#26 Posted : 06 August 2009 10:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Ian you misunderstand, misinterpret and misjudge. I was not aware that flowers were banned within some areas and wards until informed as such by my wife, who is an operating theatre manager, qualified nurse, qualified ODP and has 20 years experience of infection control issues from being involved with it rather than reading about it. So you are right, to me it is quite new, but my source is impeccable. Re-read my post and you will find, if you read it without pre-judging motive, that my point is and has been thoroughout that infection control is the point, and that this is a serious reason why the items are banned. Martin
Admin  
#27 Posted : 06 August 2009 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis Thats tells me someone's age!!!!!
Admin  
#28 Posted : 06 August 2009 11:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Be nice Swis your reaction indicates yours, you whippersnapper you Martin
Admin  
#29 Posted : 06 August 2009 15:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis not to forget my 14 years safety experience.;-)
Admin  
#30 Posted : 06 August 2009 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Must be very proud :-O
Admin  
#31 Posted : 06 August 2009 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis d(^_^)b
Admin  
#32 Posted : 06 August 2009 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Lordy lordy
Admin  
#33 Posted : 07 August 2009 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Kelly Children, children.... Seems like you are all on the same side to me, reading things into each other's email - Chinese email whispers ?
Admin  
#34 Posted : 08 August 2009 16:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose I for one am interested in the correlation between the time spent surfing the net and the safety culture and number of accidents within an organisation! Must discuss that one with my boss - NOT!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.