Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DPK
If you were commissioned to audit a large educational facility with many aspects to it including an estates department would you use ISO18001 as the standard, especially as your prior knowledge of the establishment tells you there would possibly be some major none conformance's. The establishment is not ISO certificated.
Or would you use another type of audit standard such as HSG65 or OFSTED?
The reason for asking is this, should we not be aiming for educational establishments to implement the highest standards of H&S, where as in reality and my experience, academics are not generally comfortable with H&S requirements and find the legislation a hindrance to their teaching.
DPK
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuff4blokes
Hi DPK. To audit against any standard that the organisation does not seek to achieve, has no need to achieve and will not be familiar with is in my view daft. You will certainly find loads to write about but probably contribute little to the overall safety and health of people associated with the organisation, as well as antagonise many people who you would be better having as co-operational.
Who has comissioned you? What is the brief? If you are not clear go back to them and find out what they want and why.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
Surely you can only audit against the performance standards that have been adopted by the organisation?
Most colleges will be working to HSG65. Schools most likely will not.
Few establishments will be working to 18001 apart from some in HE.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DPK
Stuff4blokes
Its the antagonising aspect which I am very conscious of preventing, hence the reason for the thread, so that point we agree on.
Alan
I fully understand your point regarding not needing 18001, it would be nice to have a standard adopted but the reality is, there isn't one.
Therefore you are, if I am correct in thinking, revert back to HSG65 as it is a recognised system.
DPK
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
Not quite sure what you said in that last paragraph DPK, but I think the answer is YES.
;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dee
If you are doing an H&S audit of a facility and there is potentially no recognised standard being followed then my basis is to always go with HSG 65 and where you are confident the specific legislation that there is a breach.
Organisations who don't really require 18001 (ie no commercial benefit or resource available to achieve) will generally listen when you advise them they are not complying to legislation. I make sure when I am citing non conformances I state the legislation and the regulation number or requirement so that they have something they can refer back to (and they will generally say to you "where does it say/intimate that in the regulations?"
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
DPK, you don't give much detail about the type of establishment but speaking generally within the UK there is already a wealth of guidance and support available for educational establishments, especially so any state funded organisations.
The Association of Colleges for example provide a whole range of policy and advisory material including auditing systems. It is only available to members so that may be why you are currently unaware of it? The Learning and Skills Council also have standards for H&S management in funded organisations which includes an auditing regime based on HSG65.
The whole purpose of such guidance and support is exactly the same as the standards you have mentioned. The use of HSG65 to define standards is just as apparent within the educational sector as in any other. I doubt that the use of ISO standards is widespread since there is no commercial demand for such external accreditation systems and HMG probably feels it does more relevant assurance work within its own systems of control.
However, just as is the case outside the educational sector, the availability of a standard is not a means to assure anything.
I would advise that you check to see what standards and systems your establishment currently uses or has access to. I would expect you to find a system available.
To suggest that our educational establishments are any different in their approach to H&S is a touch patronising I feel. Some will fail just like in any other sector but they try to meet the same challenges as any other organisation and indeed are required to do so in a much more political environment than many commercial companies.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Donaldson
DPK
If you are auditing an HE establishment be aware that the HE Sector recommends the use of HASMAP as the preferred auditing system.
HASMAP was devised to reflect the HE management arrangements and is based on HSG65.
Details of the system can be obtained by contacting the Universities Safety and Health Association Administrator at
admin@usha.org.uk
Regards
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By martinw
DPK
having carried out such a large number of inspections for the LSC in the recent past as regional health and safety adviser, we always used HSG 65 as a baseline. If you want, I can send you via overland mail or scan a copy to e-mail of the question prompt sheet which we used to elucidate information and thereby make a judgement as to the H&S provision from the organisation. If you want, I am happy to discuss off forum anything you want to about this. If not, you could let me know what area you are in and I could find out the details of the regional health and safety manager in that area for the LSC. They really are very good, and very helpful.
Let me know if I or others can help.
Martin
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DPK
Martin
Please remind me how to get your contact details as i would like to speak with you. I thought I just clicked on your name at the top of your posting.
Regards
Darren
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Howden
I work for a local authority and have carried health and safety performance audits in some of our schools over the last two years.
My set of audit questions is based on the policies and procedures that they are required to adhere to both Council wide and particular to the educational environment. Therefore in addition to the legislative requirements I also examine their arrangements for things like the administration of medicines and the management of excursions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DPK
Pete48
We all have opinions and are all entitled to have those opinions, as i stated in this thread at the start, it is in my experience.
This is based on my working with all types of educational organisations over the past 5 years not including Universities and conversations with those whom work in these organisations and being a qualified teacher myself.
A recent quote by a teacher in one of those organisations " H&S is one of the most hated subjects amongst colleagues", now I am aware that one swallow doesn't make a summer, but it is this type of feedback & information which helps identify a culture within any organisation including educational places of work.
However with this said, I am sure there are many excellent educational organisations that take full responsibility for good standards of Safety management.
I am unsure how you find my comment "academics are not generally comfortable with H&S requirements and find the legislation a hindrance to their teaching" patronising.
My original comment stands.
Regards
DPK
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Elliott
DPK - during my spell as a school governor I recall there being available a wealth of documentation related to Health & Safety and the Educational Establishment Premises Regulations. If my memory serves me well, a lot of this is available from links on teachernet -a search on google will find it for you - governornet is another link which will give you access to the Law handbook and the standards expected.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By martinw
DPK
You have mail
Martin
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By PhilP
Bill
Funnily enough I nearly put a rant on this forum a couple a months ago about the law guidance for governors you have mentioned.
IMO there is virtually no H&S guidance in the document what so ever, the guidance is 242 pages long and 16 of those are set aside for ‘Health, Safety and Welfare’. Those 16 pages are split in to 83 paragraphs.
The first 16 or so are fine and talk about Policy, responsibilities, enforcement, the DDA, and educational visits and journeys. After that the person writing the document seems to veer off course; the next 16 paragraphs (2 pages) are on home to school travel, most which is outlining who should get the service for free, this is followed by THREE lines on First Aid arrangements! The same number of lines is then given to litter, then back on course looking at radioactive sources and the management of medicines, which are a paragraph and 8 lines each. 2 pages are then given to ‘School Food and Milk’ this looks at delegation of funding, free meals and nutritional standards (nothing on hygiene). I’ll leave it there, but could keep going.
But apparently if you are governor you don’t need to worry about asbestos, legionella, access and egress from or maintenance of buildings/infrastructure, DSE, design and technology or violence and aggression. I presume the guidance is based OFSED standards or similar, all but few points of the guidance cover a very small fraction of the regulative H&S issues in a school and more of the educational standards imposed.
Not a read I would recommend for putting together an audit plan.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DPK
What a relief, I thought it was just me, however from your responses to my thread and some very enlightening conversations with some of the posters I feel my thread is justified.
The point PhilP has made regarding guidance for putting together a Audit IMO is spot on, hence the reason for asking which standard to audit against. I think I need to use HSG65 and add some specifics. I will then need to write the report ensuring deliverables are emphasised.
Thanks for the honesty from some of you.
DPK
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin J Morley
DPK,
Yes, your post is justified, but this is a general H&S forum, not an education premises one.
Some of the responses have identified Colleges and Univesities as having particular guidance and audit systems in place.
If you were looking at Secondary education in the public sector, Local Authorities will have provided guidance, with outline policies and procedures.
Whatever the organization, surely the starting point of an audit is whether it complies with its own policies and procedures. Then you might take a view of the effectiveness of those policies and procedures compared with comparable institutions, HSG65 or ISO18001 and then provide recommendations for improvement.
You ask whether we should not be aiming for educational establishments to implement the highest standards of H&S. I doubt that any H&S professional would admit to aiming lower, BUT 'so far as is reasonably practical' gives those who hold the purse strings an advantage they often take. In schools, budgets are strongly affected by staff costs so some schools have the money to implement a higher standard than others.
My personal experience suggests that academics are not alone in being generally uncomfortable with H&S requirements and finding the legislation a hindrance.
The common problem is that they have not been taught H&S, have picked up elf'n safety tips along the way and have lesson plans that therefore need rewriting. There is a wealth of subject specific guidance, as with any work area starting with HSE, for them to easily adopt.
I may share some of your reservations, but hope that you will find some pockets of good practice to offset that.
regards,
martin
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
DPK.
I apologise if I offended you in my response. I was trying to point you towards the wealth of existing guidance available and by that means warn you of the "not another type of audit" response and make the important point that a lot of people try very hard to get H&S right in the face of some severe political pressures and constantly changing goalposts across the whole spectrum of educational standards. To be represented as a group somehow generally negative towards H&S is to misrepresent the truth in my view. Struggling with the reality might be closer.
I also know that I could gain similar quotes from any hard pressed group of people trying to work in demanding situations.
"trouble with safety mate? It stops us getting the job done". Now where have we heard that before?
So, I really do hope that you are successful with your approach and that it brings the improvements that you clearly seek.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DPK
Pete48
No offence was taken and I do appreciate it is sometimes difficult to relay a written message in the way it is intended.
This post was intended to seek advice from those with more experience than myself in this specific area of auditing and I have received some excellent advice and valuable contacts which I will follow up.
Regards
DPK
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.