Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 September 2009 13:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Iain Watt HSE Doc L131 the Approved Classification and Labelling Guide (Sixth edition) - CHIP4 has just landed on my desk. The first thing I noticed was its status - an Approved Guide. On reading the preface it states ' The Chemical (Hazards Information and Packaging for Supply) Regulations 2009 impose requirements by reference to this Guide and to that extent it is legally binding.' I know were I am with the legal weighting of ACOP's and Guidance. Is this status of document something we are likely to see more of? If it is legally binding then why are they not scheduled within the regulations? Any ideas on the origins of 'Approved Guide' and are we likely to see any other guidance status?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 September 2009 13:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi Regulation 2 of CHIP 4, Interpretation includes:- "the approved classification and labelling guide” means the guide entitled “Approved Guide to the Classification and Labelling of Dangerous Substances and Dangerous Preparations (Fifth Edition)” approved by the Health and Safety Commission on 16th April 2002(11), as revised or re-issued from time to time" The key factor is " revised or reissued from tiome to time"--This is more efficient because one would have to amend regulations every time there was a change to the guide! This has been the situation since 2002.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 September 2009 13:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Iain I am not sure of the origin of 'aprroved guide' as a concept but, in this case, since the information contained in the guide must keep in step with technical advances, I can see that as reason why not to include it in the Regs. as any change in the legislation would require parliamentary time. Paul
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.