Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Louis Coleiro
Presently I am seeking some information about how much distance has to be allocated between various machinery within an engineering workshop. I found information about ergonomics and design but cannot find this information which in my opinion is important.
Can anybody help?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Della Pearlman
BSI’s document – PD 5304:2005 Guidance on safe use of machinery, has a section on the layout of machinery and plant – saying briefly that a machine should be installed with due regard to its interactions with other machines, and gangways should be wide enough to provide access for tools, materials and people. It does give general guidance, but it doesn’t give specific distances. In its ergonomic annex, it does give safety distances e.g for reaching up or down.
Having looked at quite a lot of documents, (from BSI, HSE etc) there doesn’t seem to be anything that gives actual measured distances, although there are a number of documents with general guidance on health and safety - but presumably the makers of each individual piece of machinery will know how much space is required, And you will have to take into account Building Regulations on e.g, gangway widths for fire routes, disabled access etc?
If you are looking for information on schools, there might be more in the DCSF Building Bulletins, CLEAPS etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Fred Pratley
There is/was a BSI document on minimum distances to avoid crushing part sof the body which gave a minimum gap of 500mm (19 inches) between machines, after allowing for the full traverse of the machine bed(s).
Regards Fred
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jay Joshi
I very much doubt that there is anything specific, but you should consider in all the 3 dimensions:-
1)Ergonomics
2)clearances required for maintenance of the equipment--suppliers usually state this
3)what you process in the machine for example the maximum size of the material being processed
4)Normal and emergency access and egress
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Louis
In addition to the observations noted above, there is one outstanding reason why it would be contrary to several parts of the ACOP of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 to specify what you want: it is that physical dimensions of individuals vary so much in size that you would be risking avoidable injury to advocate any standard measurements.
You would also be violating discrimination laws on sex, disability and age.
If you want to get relevant anthropometric data within erggonomic guidnace on this issue, read relevant titles by Steve Pheasant or by Karl Kroemer.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose
I don't quite understand why it would be contrary to regs to specify '..what you want..'! Surely if 'what you wanted' was properly considered taking into account ergonomic and anthropometric factors etc, how would this be contrary to the MHSWR? Could you expand on your thinking?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.