Rank: Forum user
|
Hi All, with reference to Reg. 7 (3) of The Management Regs which I quote: "The employer shall ensure that the number of persons appointed...are adequate having regard to the size of his undertaking, the risks to which his employees are exposed and the distribution of those risks throughout the undertaking.", is there any guidance as to what 'adequate' is please?
Is anyone aware of any instances where an employer has been criticised and/or prosecuted for not having adequate h & s resources please?
I am sure you are all aware of where I anm going with this but without any empirical data, I am on a hiding to nothing
Many thanks
Booney
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Booney a few years ago I was employed as part time H&S manager for a manufacturing company employing just under 250 employees on a 3 shift system. I was initially employed 2 days per week which was increased to 3 but during an HSE investigation the Principal Inspector asked for a meeting with my MD in which I was included. This worried me as I pressumed I must have made some error but no the inspector said if I had I would not have been in meeting.
He then pointed out to the MD that he had no issues with what I was doing but felt due to the size of the plant and the diverse operations in the manufacturing process they were not complying with Reg 7 (3) as he felt I was not given sufficient time and resources to fulfill my function. This was also subject of the subsequent IN.
I was then employed fulltime was part of management Team and given additional resources so good result I felt
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
This highlights the beauty of many a piece of H&S legislation, they give you an outline and the interpretation is down to the individual. It is a hard thing to judge and experience plays a major part in my opinion. If there is a particular issue you're having a problem with then I'd suggest a more directed question might reap better rewards. But basically what is adequate is open to interpretaion.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It really is horses for courses. For example, there are five of us (four advisers and me) for 2,500 employees. By some standards, that's far too many, especially as we operate in relatively low risk environments - no heavy engineering for example. However, we have over 400 workplaces, and about 3,500 volunteers, so the simple logistics of us being where we need to be when we need to be there makes a headcount of 5 just about enough, on a good day. So if we were a small NHS hospital Trust I would reckon that 2 of us would do; all on one site etc etc.
Start by drawing up a risk register; what the elements of risk are, who owns them, how they will impact on the organisation's objectives, where the risk rating should be versus where it is. Use this to evalluate what SSOWs you will need. Use that to identify training need etc. Having a written analysis will help you,
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.