Rank: Forum user 
|
We are moving to new premises and currently use 240v power tools sanders, routers etc, the production manager is wanting to purchase new 110v equipment which would cost around 5k, and as much as I would like to do this I don't think there is a legal requirement to do it and we would change as and when they are required due to maintenance or service requirements. Can anyone confirm my thoughts on this. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If something happens in a maintenance/construction situation and you are using 240v hand operated electrical kit you would be pushed to justify it as 110v is the common, best and prefered kit in most situations - noting that more and more are using battery kit
you will not find this 110v /240v arguement written down thats why risk assessment and use of all the guidance that is around is the way to go!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
It may be worth bearing in mind that 110V power tools supplied from a transformer, the yellow ones you see on building sites only has 55 volts to earth, where as your 240V appliance has 230V to earth, remembering that the defined supply voltage in the UK is now 230V, NOT 240.
HOWEVER, you will find that the stations are still generating at 240 & the DNO's are still distributing at 240!
If you do use 240V tools then at least use RCD's with them!
There is some "guidance" out there from "recognised" bodies on this, but can't rembember or find it now.
HTH
Paul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
take advice from a proper electrical engineer as RCD's are not the way to go in all cases
You should reduce the hazard first where it is RP to do so - RCD's are good but should be used after more deliberate, mechanical and positive actions have already been undertaken e.g. reducing your power supplied to the hand held tools e.g. from 240V to 110V
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
Larry, there isn't any strict requirement to do so and as has already been pointed out, you should be looking at justifying the decision through your risk assessment. The managers idea is I am sure well intentioned but depending on the outcome of a risk assessment, and unless there was an overwhelming case for 110v I, like you would be inclined to replace on a 'phased' basis as kit becomes 'duff'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
Larryl depending on your role within the company why not let them go ahead, after all it is a safar option?
If you are the holder of the purse however this may be the reason for your asking for guidance here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
I would say that, if they are willing to spend the money, then 110V is less likely to kill you so it would be best practice as opposed to strict liability.
You hear of so many Managers not happy to part with funds for elf 'n' safety so it is refreshing to hear of Production Managers who are - capitalise on this, you are in a rare position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks for all your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user 
|
Why not investigate going the "whole hog" and replacing them with battery operated tools and creating a dedicated charging bay?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.