Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Safety Smurf  
#1 Posted : 08 December 2009 11:45:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

This is a purely hypothetical question but if I was injured in accident at work, would my position effect my ability to make an injury claim?
MGF  
#2 Posted : 08 December 2009 11:58:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
MGF

hmmm... nice one

it no doubt would rely on the circumstances and whether it was done to you or by yourself through your own inaction etc,
as an employee it shouldn't make a difference although technically it is your own possible advice which wasn't suitable enough to prevent the occurance in the first place, so as you suggest, it is a case of possibly your own fault!
any H&S lawyers out there !
penshaw  
#3 Posted : 08 December 2009 12:04:41(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Being a bit pedantic, of course you can make a claim, it's wether you woukld succeed that is really the issue......it is if course the tort of negligence, I think that you would be able to stick this on your employer......however.......your "contributory negligence" could be relevant.
blodwyn  
#4 Posted : 08 December 2009 12:19:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
blodwyn

Depends how it occurred.

If you had allowed an unsafe practice, operated some equipment you were not trained to use, undertook an operation outside the operating instructions/risk assessment and you are the H&S manager/adviser and you had an awareness of these issues I do not think you would have much of a hope. However if you were injured by someone (vicarious liability) or an activity you had assessed as unsafe, but it was allowed to go ahead despite your advice and instructions (maybe another manager felt working to the RA was too long winded and allowed an unsafe operation) then your chances would be much improved I would suggest.

But saying that the world of claims is getting weirder by the day and I have to say there seems to be no rhyme or reason which ones get through and which ones dont these days. Our claims inspector and I have some really off the wall discussions these days!!! (Please note I am not being altogether serious here - as I know there are some claims people who respond on these forums!!!)

You haven't though have you? Not one of these situations where 'a friend of mines brother has asked....?'

martinw  
#5 Posted : 08 December 2009 12:20:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
martinw

Foreseeability would come into it. If it was an event which you were not told about you could not be expected to prevent the situation. Obviously if the accident was caused by the inaction or error of another eg incorrect maintenance then you could go forward with it.
What about driving on work business? Again, that is 'at work' and again circumstances will direct the course of action from both your point of view and that of the insurers and maybe the police.

Good question though Smurf
RayRapp  
#6 Posted : 08 December 2009 12:49:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Smurf

I assume you mean because you are a h&s person? It would be irrelevant in the event that you should seek redress through a personal injury claim. Indeed, for the purpose of a claim you are merely an employee. Assuming the employer has ELI any successful claim would be paid for via the insurance policy including costs.

In regards to a claim for breach of statutory duty/negligence. The latter would be all the more interesting given your job status, but should not hinder a successful claim. However, contributory negligence could apply, then again, anyone is liable to a reduced claim through contributory negligence, regardless of their status.

Anything we should know about? Just kidding.

Ray
Safety Smurf  
#7 Posted : 08 December 2009 12:57:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Blodwyn / Ray,

Thanks for your concern, no I haven't had an ... (I'm not even going to say it know in case it tempts fate).

I was just reading a claim and reading the standard; 'you have failed to make a suitable & sufficient...' Which for some reason I always feel personally agreived at when the thought entered my mind, What if I had an unmentionable?
RayRapp  
#8 Posted : 08 December 2009 13:17:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

The riddicule from your colleagues would lessen the pain of injury - trust me!
freelance safety  
#9 Posted : 08 December 2009 14:00:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

Unfortunately claims are part of our culture and anyone regardless of their role may pursue.
These days it has little to do with right and wrong doing more than robust systems (you may or may-not have) and financial payout.

I’ve had Safety Reps in the past put dubious claims in for all manner of alleged incidents. Most of the insurance companies and loss adjusters are looking to mitigate financial risk and if this means paying out some small claims rather than paying to go to court, then that’s what they will do.

Feel free to sue; it’s your legal right to do so! It also keeps lots of people in employment - lol.


ScotsAM  
#10 Posted : 08 December 2009 15:30:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ScotsAM

At the basic level if your employer had a legal duty and failed in its legal duty to you which caused you to suffer loss - then you have an answerable claim.

Consider this however - could it be argued (hypothetically) that they had failed to seek competent h&s advice if it was negligence on your own behalf (not you smurf)? If so can you argue that was their failing and thus avoid contributory negligence?
tabs  
#11 Posted : 08 December 2009 15:33:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tabs

You have the same rights, and the employer has the same obligations. The employer even has vicarious liability for your negligence ... hmmm ... probably not a workable defence.

Fortunately claims are part of our culture (I think they are a better motivator to small improvement than any legal directive). I've had people ignore legislation because they think they won't be caught, but paying compensation rather than risk going to court is quite common.

lol - couldn't resist Freelance Safety :-)
freelance safety  
#12 Posted : 08 December 2009 15:49:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

Q. As I’m my employer should I be suing me? Answers on a postcard Tab :-)
JARL Solutions  
#13 Posted : 08 December 2009 15:57:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JARL Solutions

The Employers Liability Insurance is there for anyone to claim. The measure of success in view of your your role may be human factors, in the fact of, was it a violation or was it human error, which may be easily reproduced by another in the same situation. Alternatively company negligence, which is a far more complex case to prove.

It is not uncommon for for people who work in their own discipline to make a claim. That is what the insurance is for.

I was H&S Manager for a large company that had 20,000 outstanding EL claims, many deserving cases and many chancers.

My gripe is that the chancers slow the process for the deserving cases. That said each case is thouroghly reviewed on its own merits.

Good luck,
The Aardvark  
#14 Posted : 08 December 2009 16:15:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
The Aardvark

I'm wondering if it would open up the issue of the claimant being unfit for the job they were employed to do (not suggesting you are, Smurf).

Would the negligence/liability be greater on the part of the employer if they employed a H&S Officer who was patently unfit or unqualified for such a role, and the said H&S Officer suffered an accident because of failing to give advice which they would not have been qualified to give, of had no knowledge of?

Imagine the H&S Officer standing up in court and admitting that "Yes, I'm the H&S Officer, but to be honest I don't have slightest idea about what it is I'm supposed to be doing"

There is of course no way on earth that I'm about to ask my employers this, as I know the response.
Jane Blunt  
#15 Posted : 08 December 2009 16:22:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

RayRapp wrote:
The riddicule from your colleagues would lessen the pain of injury - trust me!


Definitely.

I broke my foot once (sport injury). The entire workforce was rolling in the aisles for weeks at the sight of their Safety Officer on crutches.

JohnMackie  
#16 Posted : 08 December 2009 16:26:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JohnMackie

Jane,

Ditto, i turned up for a meeting in plaster (Broken wrist, also sport injury) and my group HSE manager was also in plaster. broken leg (ankle, garden injury). what a shining example we set that day.

cheers
RayRapp  
#17 Posted : 08 December 2009 16:36:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Oh heck, just remembered I have been drafted into the works 5-aside footie game on Thursday. Not played 5-aside since I broke my big toe about ten years ago. I anticipate being a target...
The Aardvark  
#18 Posted : 08 December 2009 16:46:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
The Aardvark

Are Sports Injuries a particular hazard for H&S Officers?

I became the H&S Officer for my current employers in February 2007, before March started I had broken both my toe and my thumb (in the same game of 5-a-side). Prior to this, I had never had a serious sports injury.

Will this need to be the next HSE Directive? All persons holding a NEBOSH Nat Cert or higher are forbidden from undertaking any kind of sports activity.
pl53  
#19 Posted : 08 December 2009 17:01:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pl53

The simple answer is no it wouldn't affect your ability to make a claim. As has been said you have the same rights as any other employee. An accident can have any number of circumstances. The duty of care lies with the employer, not with you. If you walk into a fork lift truck that appears without warning round a corner the fact that you are a H&S advisor is irrelevant. There may be any number of safe working practices in operation but it is up to managers to enforce them and employees to co-operate with them. It will only affect your claim if you are in some way careless or negligent yourself. Your position as a H&S advisor should not infer negligence per se.
ScotsAM  
#20 Posted : 08 December 2009 17:08:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ScotsAM

Aardvark - I've seen this discussion come up before and it seems that H&S Professionals have a pathological need to take part in adventurous activities!

I myself regularly run, play squash and kayak...

... though I'm currently out with sciatic nerve pain for a few weeks.
freelance safety  
#21 Posted : 08 December 2009 17:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

ScotsAM I think you may be correct in your assumption:-
Skydiving; shooting; caving and mountaineering - cannot wait till I get into plaster again (not).
Last accident - burnt arm last week (cooking) - lol!

johnld  
#22 Posted : 08 December 2009 17:43:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
johnld

To put the original question into a real life situation.

I was aware of a case many years ago where a Safety Advisor did make a claim for an injury suffered at work. His claim was brought under the Employer’s Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969.

He was successful in his claim

He continued to work for the same employer for a number of years following his successful claim.
Wizard  
#23 Posted : 09 December 2009 03:49:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Wizard

Safety Smurf,

Back to the original question, can you confirm ...........................What position were you in?

Steve e ashton  
#24 Posted : 09 December 2009 10:26:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve e ashton

Smurf: you asked: ...if I was injured in accident at work, would my position effect my ability to make an injury claim?

I would suggest (as so often on these forums) it depends...

If you are flat on your back underneath twenty tons of raw material, it will very definitely affect your ability to make a claim... (Although your estate representatives may make a claim on behalf of your widow and / or children and other dependents...).

Sorry, I'll get my coat...

Steve
Safety Smurf  
#25 Posted : 09 December 2009 17:25:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

wizard wrote:
Safety Smurf,

Back to the original question, can you confirm ...........................What position were you in?



effectively 2IC safety (not including the board)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.