Rank: New forum user
|
Hope someone can help me - we have an operator who may have to wear a hearing aid in process areas (zone 2).
Some colleagues I have spoken to have said that there is no chance of an ignition source from the hearing aid in a zone 2 area, and some material relating to a European directive appears to back this up (sorry have no source because I am not at work now)
However, I have also been advised that some petro-chemical plants do not allow hearing aids in process areas.
I'm looking for information that may assist me in making an informed decision, and this seems to be the right place.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I used to work in the petroleum field and my suggestion would be you need to consult a specialist. It may be a zone 2 area but unless the hearing aid is atex rated then there is the potential for ignition. A specilaist will provide guidance on this. Try the Association for Petroleum and Explosives Administration, they may be able to provide contacts. Not sure if you can get atex rated hearing aids and it may be that the HASAW overrides DDA in this area and that the employee can no longer work in zoned areas.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Thanks for your help - I'm looking into possible solutions with regards to atex ratings for hearing aids.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If it is a conventional and modern hearing aid without a power on-off switch with contacts that directly interrupt battery current, then ATEX is not an issue.
Typically, this type of device is classed as a PEP 1 device and can be used within the ZONE 2 area without risk of ignition and without requiring an ATEX or CE mark.
PEP 1:
body worn portable electronic product, in direct contact with the skin, that is deemed incapable of causing an ignition under normal conditions.
PEP shall meet the following criteria:
a) Radio frequency energy transmission limited in accordance with 8.3
b) No provisions for forced ventilation
c) No sparks visible in normal operation
d) No excessive temperatures in normal operation
e) No camera flash unless it can be mechanically disabled
f) No motors unless it can be demonstrated the motor incorporates non-arcing technology
g) No visible damage
h) No available listed apparatus suitable for the area classification and capable of performing the intended function
PEP 1
Products meeting the general criteria in 6.1 and all of the following additional criteria may be designated as PEP 1:
a) Powered by a maximum of two button cells
b) Body-worn and in direct contact with the skin
c) No electrical connections accessible outside the product
Examples are electronic wris[expletive deleted]ches and hearing aids that are inserted into the ears.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Humm...didn't know there was automatic censorship at work....since when was a wrist_watch an expletive (without the _). Even the twa* word it obviously thought it was isn't that offensive, is it?
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Thanks all for the welcome advice.
Much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.