Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
John Bartlett  
#1 Posted : 02 February 2010 17:12:50(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
John Bartlett

I have been a Chartered Safety and Health Practitioner for some years now and run my own consultancy. I like many others offer in house training that is relevant to my clients needs, cost effective and I like to think informative. I stress the word relevant and informative. I have a client, an SME, that has been told all his operatives must attend a construction skills health and safety awareness training course and several other 'approved / accredited courses' otherwise they will not be used in the future on contracts. I fully support the principal that companies must verify competency but I confess to find it very galling that the training that I have carried out for this client does not satisfy a contractor competency check. The client also achieved 'safe contractor' last year and I have delivered IOSH Managing Safely for several years as a provider and trainer. So what is going on I wonder? What is Chartered Status actually worth? Has anyone else had the same problem?
ckitson  
#2 Posted : 02 February 2010 18:13:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ckitson

When I was a consultant it always made me laugh when I had to go on 'accredited' H&S courses before I was allowed on site. Sometimes to find that I ended uo correcting the 'misinformation' given on the course being run by an H&S EXPERT - (IOSH Managing Safety certificate holder) In the world of contracting, he who pays gets to say what he wants!!! - Even when wrong. Chartered Status is worth what we collectively make it - it is VERY worthwhile just look at the numbers striving to attain it.
RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 02 February 2010 18:29:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I think it is indicative of where we are today. Everyone wants to re-invent the proverbial wheel by introducing yet more qualifications and of course, training courses. I'm not sure that you can benchmark chartered status against the requirements you have highlighted, really it's down to jobsworth's attitudes. On a similar note, I got a phone call from an agency last week regarding a h&s manager's role requiring chartered status. The agency chap asked me what benefits it would bring to the job. Try answering that on a postcard!
freelance safety  
#4 Posted : 02 February 2010 19:10:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

I think you have made several points here. In respect of the construction industry, the industry itself has set goals and targets in relation to accredited training e.g. CITB; IOSH etc. This has been ongoing for many years although many SME’s have yet to get on board with it. This has resulted in most major contractors specifying what minimum standards they will accept for accredited health and safety training, as well as competent advice, within the construction industry within their procurement process. As Chartered Practitioners we are able to deliver these accredited courses, so this has no bearing on the practitioners themselves. The ‘Safe Contractor Scheme’ - Although this is quite often asked for these days by many PC’s from SME’s; it does not prove that the workforce used are suitably trained of which the training received has been accredited through a known body. As an industry ourselves Chartered Status is valuable however, we have the ability to undermine our own very fractured, in my opinion, industry by questioning the validity of our own profession. Many who have been in his industry 15, 20 plus years have seen our professional status slowly evolve to a much better place for new people starting their career in occupational health and safety. We can make what we want of this, but we should be very careful of how this is seen outside of this forum and any other public sphere. Your first responder was correct in that it is what ‘WE’ make of it.
David H  
#5 Posted : 02 February 2010 19:48:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David H

I agree with Ray and John - and it does seem to be down to jobsworths attitudes. People need to be seen as trying new initiatives - and yes Freelance - I am all for that if it is an improvement and not a backward step. I attended the latest "good thing" from the Oil industry last week - MIST - and it was very poor and very basic. And this really was a "tick the box" exercise that lasted 2 whole days. The instructors were exhausted looking for ways to spin it out! Yes I have raised it with my employer who will raise it with the provider and also OPITO. But no matter - everyone wanting to fly offshore will have to pass by the end of 2010. As someone with potential Chartered status - interview in April - I am not saying that I should not have to sit the training, but make the training something valuable and not just for the sake of it. David
boblewis  
#6 Posted : 03 February 2010 10:56:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

John This is not a reflection on your status or training skills. I am in the same position even though I actually provide the CITB programmes! It is simply down to the attitudes of the construction industry who look for the easy fix and thus define certain courses only as being approved or recognised. We this reach the daft position that many good courses are not recognised. The HSE did not help the problem with their comments in the CDM acop on competency. They have merely spawned a new industry of pre-qualification organisations (all SSIP - HSE initiated of course) who in turn only look for certain types of course because these have been recognised. Answer " None I am afraid" The construction industry is desparate to pass th competency issue onto somebody else in the hope they will avoid responsibility. Bob
John Bartlett  
#7 Posted : 03 February 2010 12:48:54(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
John Bartlett

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to post your comments and it would seem there is a common 'issue' out there that many have encountered that will never be addressed. I totally agree with Bob that the CDM acop did not help the situation. Wait till you read the new guidance on Asbestos Surveys!!!! I suppose its a bit like looking for the Holy Grail and I have always said that being part of this profession is often like pushing a pee up Mount Everest with your nose. Oh well, down on my knees again and a bit more cream on my nose.
Invictus  
#8 Posted : 03 February 2010 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

ckitson wrote:
When I was a consultant it always made me laugh when I had to go on 'accredited' H&S courses before I was allowed on site. Sometimes to find that I ended uo correcting the 'misinformation' given on the course being run by an H&S EXPERT - (IOSH Managing Safety certificate holder) In the world of contracting, he who pays gets to say what he wants!!! - Even when wrong. Chartered Status is worth what we collectively make it - it is VERY worthwhile just look at the numbers striving to attain it.
I do not believe your sentiments 'it is VERY worthwhile just look at the numbers striving to attain it. I see it more as a means to an end, IOSH have made themselves the name to be associated with and therefore every employer puts this in advertisements. They have an approved trainer list etc. which employers again think that as long as you have had someone with an OSH at the end then they must be worth having. I have come across a lot of companies who are actually unsure who IOSH are and only add it to adverts as they have heard or seen other employers using it. Unfortunately being a member of IOSH, passing NEBOSH, being with IIRSM will only impress it still does not give ant indication of how you actually do the job.
Chu Chun Wah  
#9 Posted : 03 February 2010 13:57:18(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Chu Chun Wah

I live in Hong Kong and I have visited England four times. In 2005, I have the opportunity to visit some of the manufacturing companies and discussed with the OSH personnel on the qualification required for OSH practitioners in an enterprise. However, the information seemed insufficient to me to have a full picture in the profession. Would any one tell me more on the qualification required to be a safety practitioner in an undertaking? I post it here because I think the Chartered status may help. Am I correct? In Hong Kong, only the construction, container handling and ship building & repairing industries are required to employ a “registered safety officer (RSO)”. The qualification of a RSO is stipulated in the Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Safety Officer and Safety Supervisor) Regulation. I obtained the Chartered status through IOSH but the status is not well known by the employers in Hong Kong. As such, the status of a CMIOSH is much different from that of a Chartered engineer. In the employment advertisement in Hong Kong, the qualification required is RSO. It seems that the status of a CMIOSH has not been recognized yet. Wishing to hear your response soon.
RayRapp  
#10 Posted : 03 February 2010 14:18:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Sorry Chu, but I could not identify whether you are asking whether chartered status with IOSH is worthwhile or otherwise from your post. I will try to answer anyway. Chartered status regardless of the profession shows a certain level of qualifications, experience and therefore professional competence. It is in my personal opinion very worthwhile for gaining respect, applying for new jobs and as a matter of personal prestige. However, if it is not recognised in your part of the world, then clealrly many of those benefits will not readily apply. That said, it should not in itself prevent you obtaining good professional status for the future.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.