Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Ramus  
#1 Posted : 03 February 2010 14:32:49(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Ramus

Good Afternoon Has anyone out there carried out a risk assessment on the compulsory wearing of stab proof vests for street wardens. Could anyone provide me with some guidance or advice on this please? Thanks Neil
Canopener  
#2 Posted : 03 February 2010 20:10:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Neil - 52 views, no responses. I think people may not be sure what you are actually asking for. You seem to be suggesting that a risk assessment has already identified the need to wear a stab vest and you now want to know what the risks are associated with the wearing of the stab vest? If so the only sort of things I can think of are associated with the weight of the vest, and the possible effect that it may have on posture perhaps.
Barrie(Badger)Etter  
#3 Posted : 04 February 2010 10:09:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Barrie(Badger)Etter

Neil - Heat exhaution esp in the summer Where's the spill tickler? Badger
Alan Haynes  
#4 Posted : 04 February 2010 11:05:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alan Haynes

If you do a quick Google on 'stab vests risk assessment' you'll get things like V=http://www.aseo-europe.com/uk_news/stab_vests_traffic_wardens%20copy.htm which state that Ipswich gave traffic wardens stab vests after a Risk Assessment - might give you some ideas on who to contact for assistance.
RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 04 February 2010 11:08:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

There is an article in SHP online about a recent civil case for ill fitting body armour, see: http://www.shponline.co....news&article_id=9734 This may assist in identifying potential problems.
martinw  
#6 Posted : 04 February 2010 14:15:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
martinw

And consequences. The shp article did not say that the council was fined (including costs) a total of £50,000. The armour was so ill-fitting that even though they provided it in the first place they were found guilty of failing to provide protective equipment. Got to remember the requirement for it being 'suitable'....
bob youel  
#7 Posted : 04 February 2010 15:31:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

it really is a puzzle to solve as the wearing of stab vests can increase the posibility of an attack so all factors need to be considered in your 'RA' especially the human factor element where some people act differently e.g. more aggressive, whilst wearing such kit and put themselves and others at extra risk also they can draw attention poor fit and weight has been a very big problem in the past but very good kit is now available some of which does not look like body armour and can be worn under a shirt [yes underneath a shirt!] but is in fact very good against most forms of attack If a decision has already been made to wear such kit then any advice would be no use to you but the PPE regs state that you must RA so go that route
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.