Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Clifford900011  
#1 Posted : 22 February 2010 02:32:11(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Clifford900011

I have been asked by a client here in NZ to put together a briefing session for the board of directors on h&s during work organised social events and team building exercises. I am more than happy with drawing this up and dealing with the content but I am seeking some case law to include. I vaguely remember from when I used to work in the UK some years back, that there was some case law established around this. From the little that I remember I believe that it was about some soldiers who were treated to a night out by their section commander for completing some arduous exercises but one of the poor squadies died as a result of his intoxication when he fell from the truck transporting him back to barracks. I understand that the MOD was held liable. Does this ring a bell with anyone? I would like to provide some case law around this in the session and therefore if that one exists, or if there are any others like it, can any of the forum members help please? Cheers Cliffy
Phil Grace  
#2 Posted : 22 February 2010 09:13:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Cliffy, Yep - you're correct. There was another, more recent one concerning a group of off duy squaddies who were jumping/diving from a bridge or dam when one was injured. Held that here office was culpable sicne he had given permission And then there was the case of the TA unit "Dinner" at which someone was injured due to over exuberant use of a bouncy castle... What is it about the military? Can't recall exact references "off the top". Will cast about for info.. BUT In NZ there is a very different legal scenario... surely all accidents are treated on a no fault basis - very different to UK's negilgence based, adversarial system. Surely if it was a company organised social event then any accidents will be treated as work accidents and have to be notified to the Accident Compensation Corporation and handled that way. Surely the existing (NZ) rules will apply? Regards Phil
Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 22 February 2010 16:15:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I vaguely remember an article on this in the SHP some time ago. The particular point that 'stuck' with me was the argument that these works organised "social events" can be construed (in a court of law) as an extention of work, particularly where non-attendance at the "social" event was looked upon unfavourably by Managers (attendance being effectively mandatory). Sorry to be vague, but the point may be pertinent to you.
Phil Grace  
#4 Posted : 22 February 2010 17:37:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Cliffy, Fire Walking example "In Court Fire-walking Fine Business services firm Deloitte has banned staff from walking on hot coals after a fire-walking incident at a staff confidence-building exercise. A senior accountant burned her feet walking on hot embers, was taken to hospital and ended up taking a fortnight off work, after taking part in the exercise in a car park in Southwark, south London, reports the Times. In properly controlled conditions, fire-walking is supposed to be safe, and thousands of workers have done it. The accountant, however, had been given a pedicure a few days before the course and it is thought that some of the chemicals used had made her feet more sensitive to the heat. The motivational course was conducted by Si Group, a corporate development firm that has carried out fire-walking exercises for five years. At Camberwell Green Magistrates' Court, Si Group was fined £3,000 and ordered to pay £4,655 in costs after admitting that it had failed to carry out an adequate risk assessment."
Phil Grace  
#5 Posted : 22 February 2010 17:42:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Cliffy, Case Report prepared by Soibhan Thomas. Circumstances are not exactly "social events" but certainly not "on duty". "Ministry of Defence v Charles Peter Timothy Radclyffe The Ministry of Defence appealed against the decision that it was vicariously liable for the negligence of an Army Captain which resulted in Mr Radclyffe suffering personal injury. Mr Radclyffe was a Second Lieutenant and the Army Captain was in charge of the group, who were on an adventure training exercise in Germany. On a day off, the Army Captain allowed a number of soldiers to jump into a lake from a bridge. The height of the jump was about 20 metres. Both the Army Captain and Mr Radclyffe jumped from the bridge. The following day Mr Radclyffe and others went swimming in the lake again but Mr Radclyffe was badly injured after he entered the water from the bridge with his legs bent. Mr Radclyffe’s case was that the Army Captain had been negligent in giving permission for or encouraging the men to jump and he had done this based on what the Army Captain had said and done the previous day. The Ministry of Defence case was that they were acting outside the course of employment, no duty of care was owed and Mr Radclyffe had acted of his own volition and at his own risk. It was held that although the officers and men were off duty at the lake, rank and military discipline remained relevant. The Army Captain could not order the men to jump, but he could order them not to jump. The swimming trips were subject to military discipline. The Army Captain had owed the soldiers a duty of care when they were at the lake as he was the officer in charge and it was fair, just and reasonable to consider that he had a duty to take reasonable care to guard his subordinates against a foreseeable risk of injury and was therefore in breach of his duty of care. The Judge was therefore entitled to find that Mr Radclyffe’s decision to jump was causatively influenced by the pressure deriving from what the Army Captain had said and done on the previous day. The Judge was also entitled to assess Mr Radclyffe’s contributory negligence at 40%. The Ministry of Defence’s appeal was therefore dismissed."
Clifford900011  
#6 Posted : 22 February 2010 19:54:15(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Clifford900011

Thanks Everyone. Really useful stuff. Also proves my memory is not failing as fast as I suspected!!! With regard to the NZ system Phil, you are absolutely correct. The ACC (Accident Compensation Corporation scheme) takes away virtually all civil law action here in NZ as it is a no fault liability scheme providing compensation and medical rehabilitation for injured persons, either at work or home. However, I want to make the point concerning criminal liability to ensure that my client understands the need to do a risk assessment (something also alien to NZ h&s law as well!...there is no requirement here!) as part of the their organisational plans for such an event. I dont want to scare them as I think it is right and proper to have social events and team building exercises but quoting these examples might make them think a bit differently about how they should organise things. Cliffy
Rimmer22212  
#7 Posted : 23 February 2010 11:17:14(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Rimmer22212

Cliffy Unfortunately, I cannot remember the case name but the event at Lyme Bay in 1993 where four schoolchildren died in a canoeing accident directly resulted in the following legislation being enacted: Activity Centres (Young Person’s Safety) Act 1995 and the Adventure Activities Licensing Regulations 1996 Other incidents are as follows: •Four children lost their lives when they were swept out to sea off the rocks at Land’s End; •Four boys died when they slid over a precipice in Austria; •Twelve children and a teacher died when their minibus crashed into the back of a maintenance vehicle on the hard shoulder of the M40; I know these are dealing with young people but the Adventure Activities Regs may well give an insight on how to organise events and I expect that young or inexperienced people may well get involved. Hope this helps? JKR
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.