Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
SBH  
#1 Posted : 30 March 2010 13:05:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SBH

Can anyone recommend the best products for rectifying breaches to compartmentation around IT cables, utility pipes, cables etc.

Thanks

SB
Safety Smurf  
#2 Posted : 30 March 2010 13:13:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Have you considered fire resistant expanding foam?
Safety Smurf  
#3 Posted : 30 March 2010 13:19:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

you have mail
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 30 March 2010 13:44:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Messy stuff, that foam. Cement is easier. You could ask the Designer (!) (i.e. the person who determined the route of the cable).
Routine problem this. Way too often I find the air gap left unsealed, with apparently no consideration whatsoever given to the integrity of fire compartments.
PhilBeale  
#5 Posted : 30 March 2010 15:16:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

try envirograf they do a range of products one being a pillow that can be stuffed in the gap and will expand in a fire situation.also cables can then be added and removed easily without breaking any expanding foam treatment but by just simply pulling the pillow out carrying out the work and replacing it.

Phil
MaxPayne  
#6 Posted : 30 March 2010 15:48:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

shaunmckeever  
#7 Posted : 30 March 2010 16:13:27(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

For goodness sake do not use the expanding foam!!!

Not unless you have the precise measurements - required thickness - and are prepared to put your name to it that you have installed it to the required standard and that it will resist fire for 30 or 60 minutes under test conditions.
shaunmckeever  
#8 Posted : 30 March 2010 18:30:13(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Oh and don't use the pillow either for the same reasons as above plus as the pillow settles you will inevitably get gaps that will allow toxic/combustion products to permeate through the gaps.
PhilBeale  
#9 Posted : 30 March 2010 19:34:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

shaunmckeever

You told everyone what not use how about telling us what to use LoL. Chocolate and teapot spring to mind

The pillows will expand to fill any gap. SBH

there are lots of products to suit your needs have a look at the sites other members have suggested
shaunmckeever  
#10 Posted : 30 March 2010 21:26:35(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

I did not say not to use the cement but whatever is used I would advise that it is an accredited installer who does it. They know what standards to install too plus it won't invalidate your insurance.

Pillows will expand, as will any intumescent product, when they reach the temperature at which they are intended to expand, generally in the region of 120 - 150 C. Toxic products of combustion may well be given off before that temperature is reached. That is why the pillows are sold as fire stops and not smoke stops.
mighty VAL  
#11 Posted : 31 March 2010 09:40:21(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
mighty VAL

i agree with MAXPAYNE ... try HILTI products..
I have used in when i was working in the hospital..
all the holes and gaps caused by wires and medical air pipes were patched and its effective

SAFETY MATTERS
PhilBeale  
#12 Posted : 31 March 2010 09:55:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

"That is why the pillows are sold as fire stops and not smoke stops."

The question was breaches in comparmentation nothing specific around fire stop or smoke stop. i believe the pillows would have lots of benefits especially if additional cables are run along the conduit it's easier than removing either cement or foam. If you have a hole where pipe work or something else has been removed and want a permanent seal then foam or cement would be the way to go.

Phil
boblewis  
#13 Posted : 31 March 2010 10:48:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

There is a product based on rockwool and an associated sealant designed specifically for this type of work - a simple google for fire stop rockwool will find it will locate it

Bob
shaunmckeever  
#14 Posted : 31 March 2010 11:20:44(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Compartmentation is smoke and fire stopping....that is what compartmentation is about!

As for the hospital....well you may get away with it if you don't have a fire but I wouldn't want to be in your shoes if you do and there are fatalities.
PhilBeale  
#15 Posted : 31 March 2010 11:45:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

shaunmckeever

I take it you don't work for Hilti then LOL

Phil
shaunmckeever  
#16 Posted : 31 March 2010 11:55:40(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

No, I'm an independent soon to be chartered fire engineer!
bleve  
#17 Posted : 31 March 2010 13:38:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bleve

Hi Shaun,
I think you may be being a bit disingenuous there. I agree that a smoke compartment is analogous to a fire compartment. However, I think that inter compartmental smoke migration via the use of various products as discussed in this thread is not as black and white as depicted.

Again, it all depends on the fire risk assessment and the fire risk assessor ;) ; taking into account, the nature and use of the premises, fire growth and combustion products, the extent of compartment boundary penetrations, pressure differential between compartments, Smoke control systems provided and smoke retarding construction employed etc.

As you know, there are primarily two types of smoke migration, heat driven buoyancy forces resulting in strong stratification and intrafacility smoke migration. The latter is dependent on time of exposure, size of penetration, temperature of smoke, adjoining compartment volume, ventilation rate can result in tracer gas like smoke migration with minimal impact outside of the original compartment of origin.

Where possible I would advocate the use of cement products but I would not automatically dismiss other products either.
shaunmckeever  
#18 Posted : 31 March 2010 13:50:52(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

bleve I agree with what you say except the discussion was about compartmentation not inter compartmentation. I stand by what I said above.
PhilBeale  
#19 Posted : 31 March 2010 16:08:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

shaunmckeever wrote:
No, I'm an independent soon to be chartered fire engineer!


Out of interest


Which examinations or institute have you taken to become chartered fire engineer

Phil
shaunmckeever  
#20 Posted : 31 March 2010 17:39:29(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Of course Phil. It will be with the institution of fire engineers, exams are fire engineering degree and masters in forensic fire investigation plus several years experience.
shaunmckeever  
#21 Posted : 31 March 2010 17:42:50(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Of course Phil. It will be with the institution of fire engineers, exams are fire engineering degree and masters in forensic fire investigation plus several years experience.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.