Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

PPE
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Berm  
#1 Posted : 17 April 2010 17:53:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Berm

Question to all:

Using a radial arm drill, gloves or no gloves?

I work for a structural engineering company and their process is fabrication and welding of steel beams and columns.

We are going through the process of reviewing our risk assessments and systems of work.

The mandatory requirement in the shop is PPE to be worn at all times. The gloves that we wear are close fitting.

I understand that when operating this kind of machinery the risks involved of entanglement.

My route would be that when the machine has stopped, the operator would be required to wear the gloves to clean away the swarf etc.

What are your suggestions to this?
stephendclarke  
#2 Posted : 17 April 2010 19:16:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stephendclarke

Hi,
Gloves are usually a no no when using a drilling machine as they are a common cause of accident/entanglement. If essential would need careful thought/RA, have a look at the HSE guidance:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/pm83.pdf
Regards
Steve
chris.packham  
#3 Posted : 17 April 2010 19:17:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

You don't state what kind of gloves are being worn.

In any event I would be concerned about a policy that PPE is to be worn at all times. All PPE must be considered as a last resort after other methods of controlling exposure have been identified and, where practicable, implemented.

If the gloves are to protect against chemical hazards, then the selection of the correct gloves for the particular chemical is essential and this can vary, depending upon many factors. Wearing the inappropriate glove, or wearing the glove beyond its permeation breakthrough time, can increase the potential for damage to health to occur. So a blanket policy of glove wearing may actually be counter-productive, and certainly not conducive to compliance with COSHH.

As for cleaning away swarf, this presents both physical and chemical hazards and you would probably have difficulty in finding a glove that can meet both requirements. In any event, there are other, better, methods of clearing away swarf than using a gloved hand.

Chris

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.