Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Paul-B  
#1 Posted : 17 June 2010 10:55:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul-B


I am looking for Advice on a rescue plan / training of personnel in the rescue of personnel from boom and scissor lifts.


I have been looking on the sites for AFI-Uplift (SHP Magazine June 14 2010) and also IPAF.

I would appreciate if anyone could provide information on this safety matter as we are going to embark on a painting maintenance program beginning September.

The use of Boon -scissor lifts will be used I expect there will have to be at least 6 - 8 MEWPS.

The personnel are provided with training for MEWPS the sub-contractor is providing training certs for his personnel on this matter.

I only wish to question the Contractor on his rescue plan for personnel in case of any emergency rescue.

If you have on information I would be most grateful.

Thanking you advance

Paul.


Solomon  
#2 Posted : 17 June 2010 14:07:43(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Solomon

Paul,

Not sure why you would need a rescue plan for working out of a MEWP, the reason you are using a MEWP is as a collective measure to prevent a fall. You only need the rescue plan where it is foreseeable that there is a risk of a fall and your controls are for example working with a fall arrest system where they could be in suspension.

What you need to be looking at is having them working in restraint so they cannot climb out of the MEWP (monitor this), therefore not at risk of falling and you will not need to develop a rescue plan. MEWP's themselves should now be fitted with an emergency lowering control which can be operated from ground level.

Don't complicate H&S by putting in procedures which are not necessary.

Solo.
freelance safety  
#3 Posted : 17 June 2010 14:13:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

I've PM'd you.
Steve Sedgwick  
#4 Posted : 17 June 2010 14:33:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve Sedgwick

Yes I agree, use a restraint lanyard. "Fall Arrest" for WAH is at the bottom of the heirarch of controls ie the last resort.

MEWPs usually have dual controls so that they can be operated from the basket and at ground level. It is also standard practice for that this equipment is not used by a lone worker

If a MEWP breaks down while in use there should be a manually operated hydraulic valve to lower the basket safely (assuming the boom or basket are not spragged against the wall)

Steve
brian constantine  
#5 Posted : 17 June 2010 14:46:17(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
brian constantine

Hi there
if the guys are in a mewp - they shouldnt be able to fall out; they certianly shouldnt be climbing on the railing etc, monitor the situation - have the guys do a mini risk assessment t oasertain if there are any other situations that could occur. secure the guys to mewp - if possible.

a rescue plan could be developed if it breaks down (but - ensure that the mewps have been fully serviced and checked first) or if it is in dangerous environments such as toxic locations etc - for escape routes etc.
db  
#6 Posted : 17 June 2010 15:32:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
db

Guys!,........

Use the emergency lower switch on the base of the mewp to lower the work area to ground level

Simples!

Yours aye

Db
Paul-B  
#7 Posted : 19 June 2010 13:23:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul-B

Thanks for your replies; I have also checked on the websites for rescue plans.

I can assure you that the personnel working from the M.E.W.P.S will be closely watched, but what if when not been monitored as other dictates there was a situation e.g. 1 operator has stroke the mechanics / electrics of the MEWP Fail.

They will be of course wearing Harness - lanyards ( I should have mentioned that on first post) and all appropriate action will be implemented risk assessment / J.S.A / Briefing to maintenance painting personnel with how works are to be undertaken - Method statement - toolbox talks.

I do not wish to overcomplicate matters. I just want to counter the what if scenario’s (this is not a elf & safety gone mad work project) and have all in place, also please to note below information.



'The Work at Height Regulations 2005 (as ammended) specifically states
planning of work at height 'includes planning for emergencies & rescue'


When using Mobile Elevating Work Platforms (MEWP), it is a legal requirement to assess &
Formulate an emergencies & rescue plan. This plan should be compiled by a competent person
who has sufficient training & experience to assess the risks & to formulate an effective plan.


The emergencies & rescue plan should be relevant, be well communicated to all involved &
Training & drills should be carried out frequently. The emergency services should only be used
as back up or in life threatening circumstances & should not constitute the 'bulk' of the plan.


For further reading see our brief presentation on Mobile Elevating Work Platform (MEWP) -
Planning For Emergencies & Rescue. (Click on image below). This presentation has been
prepared from available sources as at 2009 & is intended only as an 'insight' to assist with
any planning involving MEWP. Remember, reference should always be sought foremost
from the various applicable U.K. regulations and safety guidelines enforced by the HSE.


Here is the website http://accessoperator.co.uk/default.aspx for above..




The Work at Height Safety Association
Technical Guidance Note 5
“Guidance on rescue during work at height”
A series of informative notes for all industries involved with
work at height or rescue.


Guidance on rescue during work at height
Introduction

www.wahsa.org.uk


This leaflet is intended to provide guidance on emergency planning and the provision of rescue
resources for work at height, either for rescue of an incapacitated person by others, or self evacuation of
an individual without additional assistance.
The emergency planning element is often not considered when work at height is being planned.
Employers may wish to consider the following points:

• there is a lack of awareness of the effects of suspension in a harness and its consequences

• employers often fail to appreciate where and when rescue provision is required

• employers often fail to provide adequate rescue equipment or appreciate what is suitable
equipment for use in rescue

• because rescue operations are carried out under extreme pressure, consideration should be
given to all aspects of the rescue process. Elements to consider would include the type of
equipment required, the demands placed upon the rescuer, the training the rescuer will require
to carry out the rescue and how the effectiveness of the rescue system as a whole can be
maintained.

This guidance note offers general information about the issues which should be considered for
emergency procedures for all work at height.

It does not give information or detailed guidance on specific procedures or indicate whether individual
methods might be preferable. Each site and each situation will be different.

The law

The Work at Height Regulations require employers to make specific provisions for emergency planning:
Organisation and planning – Regulation 4

(1) Every employer shall ensure that work at height is … properly planned

(2) Planning of work includes planning for emergencies and rescue.

www.wahsa.org.uk


mattyturton  
#8 Posted : 19 June 2010 13:37:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mattyturton

I agree that a rescue plan is needed, I have been working in the fall protection industry and whenever i have had to use a mewp the rescue plan is usually just s simple as having a man on the ground to operate the emergancy controls. if somebody does manage to fall out suspension trauma is the real issue(assuming they are attached) this is usually solved by the wearing of a work positioning harness coupled with an elasti rope allowing the user to stand and not be susceptible.
Paul-B  
#9 Posted : 19 June 2010 14:05:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul-B

mattyturton wrote:
I agree that a rescue plan is needed, I have been working in the fall protection industry and whenever i have had to use a mewp the rescue plan is usually just s simple as having a man on the ground to operate the emergancy controls. if somebody does manage to fall out suspension trauma is the real issue(assuming they are attached) this is usually solved by the wearing of a work positioning harness coupled with an elasti rope allowing the user to stand and not be susceptible.


Thank you Matty.

As I have said I do not want to overcomplicate matters, but I want to have in place a rescue plan in case of any eventuality.

The contractor has contacted our department and will be forwarding his rescue plan.

I am of course well aware of the dangers / high risk to personnel from suspension trauma.

I thank you for your reply

Take care

Paul

Please see Paul Seddon’s report to the HSE CRR452/2002 on Suspension Trauma.

DavidWarby  
#10 Posted : 21 June 2010 00:58:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DavidWarby

Agree with previous posters that a rescue plan should be developed, but keep it simple.. I personally use a single page flow chart which splits based on personnel conscious/unconscious and triggers involvement of appropriately trained & equipped rescue personnel. Wherever possible I bring down the Emergency Response team leader/coordinator and develop the rescue plan with their guidance.

EG Personnel unconscious: emergency response crew mobilised, appropriately trained person transferred into basket to monitor patient (by rope access, another ewp, whatever - depending on situation) and if possible the basket lowered... if basket cannot be lowered then personnel are transferred outta there and lowered

Most of the places I work have appropriately qualified, experienced and equipped emergency response teams on site so I am able to basically say "In case of emergency handball to those guys." If this isn't the case in your workplace then you may need to go into more detail and consider how you will rescue your people from the basket if it cannot be lowered for some reason...

My 2c

-Dave


p.s. If it will help I can send through an example rescue plan I used on my last job (working from EWP in an open pit mine site to install ground support anchors & shotcrete) - but the HDD with that on it is at home so will have to wait until tomorrow.
Paul-B  
#11 Posted : 22 June 2010 08:06:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul-B

DavidWarby wrote:
Agree with previous posters that a rescue plan should be developed, but keep it simple.. I personally use a single page flow chart which splits based on personnel conscious/unconscious and triggers involvement of appropriately trained & equipped rescue personnel. Wherever possible I bring down the Emergency Response team leader/coordinator and develop the rescue plan with their guidance.

EG Personnel unconscious: emergency response crew mobilised, appropriately trained person transferred into basket to monitor patient (by rope access, another ewp, whatever - depending on situation) and if possible the basket lowered... if basket cannot be lowered then personnel are transferred outta there and lowered

Most of the places I work have appropriately qualified, experienced and equipped emergency response teams on site so I am able to basically say "In case of emergency handball to those guys." If this isn't the case in your workplace then you may need to go into more detail and consider how you will rescue your people from the basket if it cannot be lowered for some reason...

My 2c

-Dave


p.s. If it will help I can send through an example rescue plan I used on my last job (working from EWP in an open pit mine site to install ground support anchors & shotcrete) - but the HDD with that on it is at home so will have to wait until tomorrow.



Dave that would be great if you could forward me a sample form to which I can gain knowledge.

As to the rescue of person by - E.R.T - I consider it to be top priority.

It is quite easy to say just lower the MEWP lift by emergeny simple! lower switch if available, but I want to know is that the operators know where this switch is and how to operate..

Yes it I want to keep it simple and the people safe.

Thanks

Paul
JohnW  
#12 Posted : 22 June 2010 16:57:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

Falling isn't the only hazard with MEWPs and scissor lifts. Rapid/careless movement can lead to impact of head with overhead pipes/branches/ceilings and resulting in unconsciousness.

For an MEWP and person-lifting scissor-lift there should be a ground operator, someone who can use controls to lower the equipment.


JohnW
Ron Hunter  
#13 Posted : 22 June 2010 17:07:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Restraint harness/lanyards are not mandatory in MEWP/ scissor lift use. They are only required where there is a risk of collision with the potential to eject the occupants.
Restraint systems must not be used when working on/near water.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.