Rank: Super forum user
|
Opinions are required as to whether 1 inch rebated doors that slot into each other can be classed as a fire door if the strips are missing, they do offet a tight fit
SBH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
SBH, I guess the real test is whether they are hot & cold smoke tight and not just tight.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
You would need to check the relevant British Standard. However, my recollection is that 1" rebates no longer meet the required standard. Fire doors need to have an intumescent seal and appropriate cold smoke seal.
Regards.
DJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
SBH we need a bit more information to determine suitability as a nominal fire door.
You say the strips are missing? Are they actuall missing or not provided?
What is the nature of premises? sleeping accomodation, health care etc
Where are the doors located within the premises? Access to staircase, corridor sub division, area of high fire risk etc
What materials are the doors?
What thickness?
Frame detail?
Gap at architrave ?
How many hinges? Type ?
Door closer?
Glazing?
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
I'm not sure what you mean 'slot into each other' but generally doors with 1" rebates are no longer satisfactory as fire doors. Tests were undertaken some time ago showing that the rebates failed to prevent an adequate seal between the fire side and the protected side due to pressure build in the room of the fire forcing smoke past the rebate.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
So do all doors with 1" rebates have now to be changed?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
That's down to your assessment Chris but 1" rebates do not provide an adequate seal between the room of fire and the protected space.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ChrisBurns wrote:So do all doors with 1" rebates have now to be changed? My understanding is that Building Regs are not necessarily applied retrospectivley, however if you are the responsible person for the building you may want to plan to bring them upto the latest standard or make the change anyway subject to your fire risk assessment. http://www.planningporta...bcapproveddocumentslist/http://www.bwf.org.uk/firedoors/
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Shaun is correct, a 25mm rebate will result in 35 m^3/hr smoke leakage when subjected to a delta P of 25 vs the required 3 m^3/hr.
However, dependent on the outcome of the r/a the existing door may be suitable for its current duty and may remain in place until the time of necessary replacement or upgrade.
If it is to function as a fire and smoke door then the existing arrangemnt would not be acceptable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.