Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Chi-Sing Lam  
#1 Posted : 28 June 2010 14:43:14(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Chi-Sing Lam

In construction activity, the client often requires the contractor providing safe systems of work in the project, is it practical? Does the client understand the safe system of work and monitor the work in the course of progress? I have experience that only safety practitioner can understand the safe systems of works and its implementation, the client should employ safety practitioner to monitor the contractor safe performance, is it right? please voice out.
bob youel  
#2 Posted : 29 June 2010 15:16:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Clients may not understand what safe systems of work are nor monitor activities but somewhere along the line they have been advised that these areas are something that they should cover in their tender. Provision of such systems should be a practicable thing to do for a contractor as such things should already be in place Clients should have a trusted friend to hand and the safety practitioner can be this person. Additionally a good safety practitioner should know all about such systems - also note that proper construction managers should also know about such things as its they who are supposed to manage such things
Captain Scarlet  
#3 Posted : 30 June 2010 05:32:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Captain Scarlet

Chi-Sing Lam wrote:
In construction activity, the client often requires the contractor providing safe systems of work in the project, is it practical? Does the client understand the safe system of work and monitor the work in the course of progress? I have experience that only safety practitioner can understand the safe systems of works and its implementation, the client should employ safety practitioner to monitor the contractor safe performance, is it right? please voice out.
Chi-Sing Lam; He may not understand the actual documetation, but will certainly understand the ramifications of poorly laid HSE practices. Clients, I would expect anyway, would have a project manager, and/or an HSE consultant to ensure that all requirements are met to maintain the HSE record of your client.
Alex Petrie  
#4 Posted : 03 July 2010 18:02:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Alex Petrie

Depending on whether or not the construction work in question is notifiable under the Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 2007 (CDM), the client should appoint a CDM Co-Ordinator. Part of his or her job would be to advise the client on the suitability of the safe system of work and wider management arrangements for the job. Obviously where the project isn't notifiable, a CDM Co-ordinator won't be appointed. I would suggest that it would then be a duty of the client's source of competent health & safety advice to advise them on the proposed safe system of work. Notwithstanding the above, the client should have robust procedures in place to ensure only competent contractors are appointed to carry out works, which should include technical competence and health & safety training. The client won't necessarily have to monitor the works themselves - they can require the contractor to carry out monitoring as part of the contractor's health & safety management of the work. A
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.