Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
safetyman2010  
#1 Posted : 27 September 2010 17:51:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetyman2010

Hi All, Putting together my budget for 2011 and have explored the possibilty of e-learning package from one of the main suppliers out there. (not sure if i can mention them on here though?) I'm keen to go ahead with this however i just want to make sure there is no problems with using the e-learning forum for training employees. The main areas will be PPE Awareness, Fire Awareness, Chemical Safety and Manual Handling. We currently out sourced the Chemical and Manual and did classrooms for fire and PPE but there is only myself to complete the training and i simply do not have resources to continue with this nor at the refresher frequency i would like. Chem and Manual training is very expensive and due to the processes it is extremly difficult to get staff released and we have a hugh backlog now. E-learning gives the flexiblility of completing modules at our times and allowing refresher or post incident retraining immediately. Some comments have been made about leaving the classroom style for e learning is not a good route but I feel the package we are looking to purhcase is very comprehensive. Only issue is it is not completely site specific. Does anyone have any comments on this or advice?
PhilBeale  
#2 Posted : 27 September 2010 19:55:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

My concern has always been in ensuring that employees take the information in and understand it. i know most have questions that need to be answered but they either get together in groups and answer then or they skip through the presentation to get to the question write them down then go through the presentation only taking note of the relevant answers.or one person sits through the presentation and passes the answers to everyone else. It doesn't allow for any specific questions or problems someone might have if they can't ask it during training then they might never ask the question again. Potentially shows a lack of management buy in towards health and safety if a piece of software is all that is required to provide training. If an incident accident did occur would this form of training be deemed suitable in court? The main benefits are that you can provide training for staff quickly and cheaply with minimal cost in both time and money. Whilst possible complying with legislation around staff training whether it's suitable or sufficient might be down to whether the subject matter is high or low as to whether staff have taken the information on board some subjects i don't think this method is suitable as a first introduction but possible as a refresher. I still believe qualified or experienced trainers is the correct way to go but often money can be a driver to this form of training but you still need to ensure it's suitable ans sufficient if it's not then you are failing your employees and potentially putting them at risk Who knows may be e-learning will be all that is required to get a driving license, would that be suitable and sufficient? where do you stop in cost cutting. Phil
safetyman2010  
#3 Posted : 27 September 2010 20:32:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetyman2010

Thanks for your response. I agree in some respects to your response but on others i think it suitable. The training is developed to an agreed standard covering required areas. The tests cannot be done by colleagues or only answers learnt as the content is random and progress through all sections is timed and recorded so if sections are skipped through too quickly it is recorded and assessed. On the classroom training front, if i could, I would prefer to go this route but it simply cannot be done at our site without an designated trainer. In my opinion, at the position we are currently at the e-learning would have a positive effect. It would ensure core modules are completed and completed at regular intervals that are simply not possible for class room courses. It also means we can provide more training for more staff than currently available and improve competence, knowledge on subjects and raise the profile of safety at the site. We will still provide Induction training for all staff and class room for issues like confined space, etc. Specific info is covered in SOPs and risk assessments.
John D C  
#4 Posted : 28 September 2010 10:57:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John D C

The use of e-learning can be very useful in reducing costs of training but beware of the use of it for practical subjects like manual handling. You can do the theory bit but this will not ensure that people have grasped the actual methods to be used even if they know the answers in a test. Practical tasks need practical assessments. You say you have difficulty in getting people released for training so how are you going to ensure they get the e- learning packages as many mangers will just think that as it is available at all times to people then when 'production' is in a rush they will postpone the training and then this becomes the norm so the amount of training will still be low. Some organisations have said that people can do the training at home but be careful as this will be breach of the law if they do not get paid. Take care John C
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.