We are CDM-C's for a refurbishment project in a building that will remain in use for the duration of the works. My client is also planning numerous conferences over the same period. With this in mind the client is unwilling to allow for a site compound area and is saying that all site operatives etc can use certain facilities in the existing building, including shared welfare and mess areas. i have pointed out that this is not the best idea but she is adamant that she needs the space ans that sharing will not cause any issues, I believe differently! Do any other users have experience of similar? or advice as to how to come up with a mutual beneficial solution / compromise. Many thanks in advance.

Client is fully aware of all implications. the facilities proposed are not even close to the area of works, the toilet is one way and the mess area (shared with office staff) is in another direction.

Sutty, I worked for many years as a lift engineer mainly working in occupied office blocks in the city of London, as long as your staff are fully aware of the dos and don'ts then there shouldn't be a problem, but it will only take one incident where a staff member complains about your workers and there could be a major problem. I once worked for a day in a care home replacing a seal on a hydraulic lift, two care workers were constantly pestering mainly my mate as I was in the lift shaft, they supplied cups of tea etc... And admittedly my mate flirted with them, and they flirted back. The job was done we thanked them for the teas etc... And left the premises without any problem. A week later we were called to the office and told that we were both being accused of sexual harassment!! The care workers had got into trouble for not completing their work, and turned on us to cover for themselves. It was very messy, and I found it really difficult having to prove I was innocent, especially as the accusations were completely unfounded. So I would advice that you warn your workers of the problems ahead, and try and use the facilities available at a time when their staff are not present. Good luck

Agreed. The key player is the guy who has got to work to the proposed rules. Facilitate a meeting to clarify the implications (by which I mean put pressure on the client). No doubt a pre-meeting would help...?