Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Lower risks associated with SME's? = Somebody needs to point Lord Young in the right direction as the risk present has no bearing on the size of the company in many cases especially so as apparently >80% of all companies are SME's who work in all industrial sectors
SME examples: Arbourists, Blacktop gangs, Cornershop offlicence, Sewer gangs, Scaffolder gangs,
Gangmaster areas, builders etc; the list goes on and on
And 'suitable and sufficient 'comes to mind when I look at some RA examples given by experts; as its only a judge [&/or possibly a jury] that will decide if a RA is suitable and sufficient and the trap of thinking 'this is the HSE example so I am covered' needs to be avoided as the very same people providing an example will be looking for holes when they prosecute and they will find them
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Bob, absolutely true. The HSE tick-list RA for offices is a fairly poor tool in my view, and certainly with regard to fire doesn't come close to satisfying the requirements of the RR(FS)O. Like so much literature on fire it starts by asking how a fire will be noticed and the alarm raised; this is useless. It doesn't begin to ask the employer what they might be doing to prevent a fire in the first place, which to my mind is the whole point: no fire, no worries,
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.